Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
-
Andrew J. Lotto
Abstract
Purported units of speech, e.g. phonemes or features, are essentially categories. The assignment of phonemic (or phonetic) identity is a process of categorization: potentially discriminable speech sounds are treated in an equivalent manner. Unfortunately the extensive literature on human categorization has typically focused on simple visual categories that are defined by the presence or absence of discrete features. Speech categories are much more complex. They are often defined by continuous values across a variety of imperfectly valid features. In this paper, several kinds of categories are distinguished and studies using human subjects, animal subjects and computational models are presented that endeavor to describe the structure and development of the sort of complex categories underlying speech perception.
verified
References
1 Aaltonen, O.; Eerola, O.; Hellström, Å.; Uusipaikka, E.; Heikki Lang, A.: Perceptual magnet effect in the light of behavioral and psychophysiological data. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 1090–1105 (1997).10.1121/1.418031Search in Google Scholar
2 Chomsky, N.A.: Syntactic structures (Mouton, The Hague 1957).10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar
3 Chomsky, N.A.: Aspects of the theory of syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge 1965).10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar
4 Damper, R.I.; Harnad, S.R.: Neural network models of categorical perception. Percept. Psychophys. (in press).Search in Google Scholar
5 Hansen, H.M.: Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J. exp. Psychol. 58: 321–372 (1959).10.1037/h0042606Search in Google Scholar
6 Johnson, K.; Flemming, E.; Wright, R.: The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69: 505–528 (1993).10.2307/416697Search in Google Scholar
7 Jones, D.J.: The phoneme (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1967).Kluender, K.R.; Diehl, R.L.; Killeen, P.R.: Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science 237: 1195–1197 (1987).Search in Google Scholar
8 Kluender, K.R.; Lotto, A.J.; Holt, L.L.; Bloedel, S.B.: Role of experience in language-specific functional mappings for vowel sounds as inferred from human, nonhuman, and computational models. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 104: 3568–3582 (1998).Search in Google Scholar
9 Kuhl, P.K.; Williams, K.A.; Lacerda, F.; Stevens, K.N.; Lindblom, B.: Linguistic experiences alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606–608 (1992).10.1126/science.1736364Search in Google Scholar
10 Liberman, A.M.; Mattingly, I.G.: The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1–36 (1985).10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6Search in Google Scholar
11 Liljencrants, J.; Lindblom, B.: Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839–862 (1972).10.2307/411991Search in Google Scholar
12 Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963).10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar
13 Lindblom, B.: Phonetic universals in vowel systems; in Ohala, Jaeger, Experimental phonology (Academic Press, Orlando 1986).Search in Google Scholar
14 Lindblom, B.; MacNeilage, P.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: Self-organizing processing and the explanation of phonological universals; in Butterworth, Comrie, Dahl, Explanations of the phonetic universals (Mouton, The Hague 1983).10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.181Search in Google Scholar
15 Lisker, L.; Abramson, A.S.: A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384–422 (1964).10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830Search in Google Scholar
16 Lively, S.E.; Pisoni, D.B.: On prototypes and phonetic categories: a critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception. J. exp. Psychol. hum. Perception Performance 23: 1665–1679 (1997).10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1665Search in Google Scholar
17 Lotto, A.J.: General auditory constraints in speech perception: the case of perceptual contrast; PhD diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison (1996).Search in Google Scholar
18 Mackintosh, N.J.: Categorization by people and pigeons: the twenty-second Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Q. Jl. exp. Psychol. 48: 193–214 (1995).Search in Google Scholar
19 Maddieson, I.: Patterns of sound (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984).10.1017/CBO9780511753459Search in Google Scholar
20 Nearey, T.M.: Speech perception as pattern recognition J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 3241–3254 (1997).10.1121/1.418290Search in Google Scholar
21 Ohala, J.J.: Experimental historical phonology; in Anderson, Jones, Historical linguistics II: Theory and description in phonology (North Holland, Amsterdam 1974).Search in Google Scholar
22 Ohala, J.J.: Acoustic-auditory aspects of speech. 35th Regional Meet. Chicago Ling. Soc., Univ. Chicago, April 1999.Search in Google Scholar
23 Posner, M.I.; Keele, S.W.: On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. exp. Psychol. 77: 353–363 (1968).10.1037/h0025953Search in Google Scholar
24 Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization; in Collins, Smith, Readings in cognitive science: a perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo 1998).Search in Google Scholar
25 Rosch, E.H.: Natural categories. Cognitive Psychol. 4: 328–350 (1973).10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar
26 Saffran, J.R.; Aslin, R.N.; Newport, E.L.: Statistical learning by 8-month-olds. Science 274: 1926–1928 (1996).10.1126/science.274.5294.1926Search in Google Scholar
27 Saffran, J.R.; Johnson, E.K.; Aslin, R.N.; Newport, E.L.: Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70: 27–52 (1999).10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00075-4Search in Google Scholar
28 Saffran, J.R.; Newport, E.L.; Aslin, R.N.; Tunick, R.A.; Barrueco, S.: Incidental language learning: listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychol. Sci. 8: 101–105 (1997).10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.xSearch in Google Scholar
29 Spence, K.W.: The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychol. Rev. 43: 427–449 (1936).10.1037/h0056975Search in Google Scholar
30 Spence, K.W.: The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychol. Rev. 44: 430–444 (1937).10.1037/h0062885Search in Google Scholar
31 Spence, K.W.: The nature of the response in discrimination learning. Psychol. Rev. 59: 89–93 (1952).10.1037/h0063067Search in Google Scholar
32 Spence, K.W.: Behavior theory and learning (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1960).Search in Google Scholar
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
Articles in the same Issue
- Special Section
- Title Page
- Foreword
- Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
- Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
- Emotive Transforms
- The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
- The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
- Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
- Perceptual Processing
- Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
- General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
- Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
- Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
- Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
- Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
- The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
- Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
- En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
- An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
- Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
- The Construction of a First Phonology
- Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
- Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
- Commentary
- Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
- Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
- Paper
- Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
- Further Section
- Publications Björn Lindblom
- Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
- Contents Vol. 57, 2000
Articles in the same Issue
- Special Section
- Title Page
- Foreword
- Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
- Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
- Emotive Transforms
- The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
- The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
- Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
- Perceptual Processing
- Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
- General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
- Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
- Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
- Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
- Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
- The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
- Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
- En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
- An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
- Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
- The Construction of a First Phonology
- Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
- Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
- Commentary
- Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
- Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
- Paper
- Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
- Further Section
- Publications Björn Lindblom
- Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
- Contents Vol. 57, 2000