Band 8, Heft 2

Objectives Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including “PIPAC” and “pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.” Content Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC. Summary The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients’ wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…). Outlook Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.

Objectives The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) is a four-tied pathologic score measuring tumor regression in biopsies from patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) receiving chemotherapy. Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospective registry (NCT03210298) analyses 97 patients with isolated PM under palliative chemotherapy. We examined the predictive value of the initial PRGS for overall survival (OS) and the prognostic value of PRGS in repeated peritoneal biopsies. Results The 36 (37.1 %) patients with an initial mean PRGS≤2 had a longer median OS (12.1 months, CI 95 % 7.8–16.4) vs. 8.0 months (CI 95 % 5.1–10.8 months) in 61 (62.9 %) patients with PRGS≥3 (p=0.02) After stratification, the initial PRGS was an independent predictor of OS (Cox-regression, p<0.05). Out of 62 patients receiving≥two chemotherapy cycles, 42 (67.7 %) had a histological response (defined as a lower or stable mean PRGS in successive therapy cycles), and 20 (32.3 %) progressed (defined as an increasing mean PRGS). PRGS response was associated with a longer median OS (14.6 months, CI 5–95 % 6.0–23.2) vs. 6.9 (CI 5–95 % 0.0–15.9) months. PRGS response was prognostic in the univariate analysis (p=0.017). Thus, PRGS had both a predictive and prognostic significance in patients with isolated PM receiving palliative chemotherapy in this patient cohort. Conclusions This is the first evidence for the independent predictive and prognostic significance of PRGS in PM. These encouraging results need validation in an adequately powered, prospective study.

Objectives The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) consensus subdivided pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) into four groups according to histopathological features. The aim of this paper is to report survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) from a national referral centre and to correlate the PSOGI classification with survival. Methods A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Consecutive patients treated with CRS + HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin were included (September-2013 to December-2021). Pathological features of the peritoneal disease were used to classify patients into the four groups proposed by PSOGI. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of pathology on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall, 104 patients were identified; 29.6 % were reclassified as acellular mucin (AM), 43.9 % as low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), 22.4 % as high-grade MCP (HGMCP) and 4.1 % as HGMCP with signet ring cells (HGMCP-SRC). Median PCI and rate of optimal cytoreduction were 19 and 82.7 %, respectively. Median OS and DFS were not reached, 5-year OS and DFS were 88.6(SD 0.04) % and 61.6(SD 0.06) %, respectively. Log-Rank test revealed significant differences in terms of OS and DFS across the different histological subgroups (p<0.001 in both cases). However, histology did not retain its significance in the multivariate analysis for OS or DFS (p=0.932 and p=0.872, respectively). Conclusions Survival outcomes after CRS + HIPEC for PMP are excellent. The PSOGI pathological classification correlates with OS and DFS, but differences were not significant at multivariate analysis when adjusted for other prognostic factors.

Objectives Cytology of ascites or peritoneal washing is a routine part of staging of peritoneal metastases (PM). We aim to determine value of cytology in patients undergoing pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Methods Single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients having PIPAC for PM of different primary between January 2015 and January 2020. Results A total of 75 patients (median 63 years (IQR 51–70), 67 % female) underwent a total of 144 PIPAC. At PIPAC 1 59 % patients had positive and 41 % patients had negative cytology. Patients with negative and positive cytology only differed in terms of symptoms of ascites (16% vs. 39 % respectively, p=0.04), median ascites volume (100 vs. 0 mL, p=0.01) and median PCI (9 vs. 19, p<0.01). Among 20 patients who completed 3 PIPACs (per protocol), cytology changed in one from positive to negative, and in two from negative to positive. Median overall survival was 30.9 months in the per protocol group and 12.9 months in patients having <3 PIPACs (=0.519). Conclusions Positive cytology under PIPAC treatment is more frequently encountered in patients with higher PCI and symptomatic ascites. Cytoversion was rarely observed and cytology status had no impact on treatment decisions in this cohort.

Objectives Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has enabled better prognosis for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. However, in older age groups, short -and long-term outcomes are still perceived as poor. We evaluated patients aged 70 and over and determine if age is a predictor of morbidity, mortality and overall survival (OS). Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on CRS/HIPEC patients and categorised by age. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, mortality, hospital and incentive care unit (ICU) stay and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Results A total of 1,129 patients were identified with 134 aged 70+ and 935 under 70. There was no difference in OS (p=0.175) or major morbidity (p=0.051). Advanced age was associated with higher mortality (4.48 vs. 1.11 %, p=0.010), longer ICU stay (p<0.001) and longer hospitalisation (p<0.001). The older group was less likely to achieve complete cytoreduction (61.2 vs. 73 %, p=0.004) and receive EPIC (23.9 vs. 32.7 %, p=0.040). Conclusions In patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, age of 70 and above does not impact OS or major morbidity but is associated with increased mortality. Age alone should not be a limiting factor in selecting CRS/HIPEC patients. Careful multi-disciplinary approach is needed when considering those of advanced age.

Objectives The Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is designed to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing stress response following surgery. A two part ERAS guidelines specific for Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was recently published with intent of extending the benefit to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This survey was performed to examine clinicians’ knowledge, practice and obstacles about ERAS implementation in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Methods Requests to participate in survey of ERAS practices were sent to 238 members of Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface malignancies (ISPSM) via email. They were requested to answer a 37-item questionnaire on elements of preoperative (n=7), intraoperative (n=10) and postoperative (n=11) practices. It also queried demographic information and individual attitudes to ERAS. Results Data from 164 respondents were analysed. 27.4 % were aware of the formal ERAS protocol for CRS and HIPEC. 88.4 % of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices for CRS and HIPEC either, completely (20.7 %) or partially (67.7 %). The adherence to the protocol among the respondents were as follows: pre operative (55.5–97.6 %), intra operative (32.6–84.8 %) and post operative (25.6–89 %). While most respondents considered implementation of ERAS for CRS and HIPEC in the present format, 34.1 % felt certain aspects of perioperative practice have potential for improvement. The main barriers to implementation were difficulty in adhering to all elements (65.2 %), insufficient evidence to apply in clinical practice (32.4 %), safety concerns (50.6 %) and administrative issues (47.6 %). Conclusions Majority agreed the implementation of ERAS guidelines is beneficial but are followed by HIPEC centres partially. Efforts are required to overcome barriers like improving certain aspects of perioperative practice to increase the adherence, confirming the benefit and safety of protocol with level I evidence and solving administrative issues by setting up dedicated multi-disciplinary ERAS teams.