Startseite Naturwissenschaften Solubilization of PCBs by Surfactant Solution: Minimization of Partitioning Loss of Surfactant
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Solubilization of PCBs by Surfactant Solution: Minimization of Partitioning Loss of Surfactant

  • M. Müllerová , M. Šváb , Z. Vysopalová und T. Nováková
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. April 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen
Tenside Surfactants Detergents
Aus der Zeitschrift Tenside Surfactants Detergents Band 45 Heft 4

Abstract

Studies of solubilization of organic contaminants by surfactants are complicated by the fact that the effective surfactant concentration is decreased by partitioning into the organic phase. This paper introduces an experimental setup for surfactant solubilization where the partitioning loss of surfactants is minimized. Using this setup, two anionic (sodium dodecyl sulphate and Spolapon AOS 146) and one nonionic surfactant (Novanik 0633 A) were compared. When comparing solubilization efficacies expressed as multiples of the critical micelle concentration, the two anionic surfactants were able to solubilize a higher amount of polychlorinated biphenyls. For lower surfactant concentrations, solubilization efficacies were similar for all surfactants. However, it is necessary to take into account that the critical micelle concentration of the nonionic surfactant is considerably lower.

Kurzfassung

Studien zur Solubilisierung von organischen Kontaminanten sind kompliziert, aufgrund der Tatsache, dass die effektive Tensidkonzentration durch Partitionierung in die organische Phase abnimmt. Diese Arbeit stellt einen Versuchsaufbau zur Tensidsolubilisierung vor, bei dem der Partitionierungsverlust an Tensiden minimiert worden ist. Unter Verwendung dieses Versuchsaufbaues wurden zwei anionische (Natriumdodecylsulfat und Spolapon AOS 146) und ein nichtionisches Tensid (Novanik 0633 A) gegenübergestellt. Beim Vergleich der Solubilisierungswirksamkeiten, angegeben als Mehrfaches der kritischen Mizellbildungskonzentration, sind die zwei anionischen Tenside in der Lage, höhere Mengen an polychlorierten Biphenylen zu solubilisieren. Für niedrigere Tensidkonzentrationen sind die Solubilisierungswirksamkeiten für alle Tenside ähnlich. Wichtig hierbei ist aber zu berücksichtigen, dass die kritische Mizellbildungskonzentration des nichtionischen Tensids wesentlich geringer ist.

Key words:: Surfactants; solubilization; non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs); partitioning
Stichwörter:: Tenside; Solubilisierung; Non-Aqueous Phase-Liquids (NAPLs); Partitionierung
∗ Ing. Mgr. Martina Müllerová, Department of Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic, Tel.: +420220443804, Fax: +420220445029. E-mail:

Ing. Mgr. Martina Müllerová born 1980, studied at the Institute of Chemical Technology Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology) and at Charles University in Prague (Institute for Environmental Studies). After concluding her Master studies in 2005, she started PhD. studies at the Institute of Chemical Technology Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology).

Ing. Marek Šváb, PhD. born 1976, studied at the Institute of Chemical Technology Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology). After concluding his PhD. studies in 2004, he works as a lecturer at the Institute of the Chemical Technology (Faculty of Environmental Technology).

Ing. Zuzana Vysopalová born 1983, studied at the Institute of Chemical Technology Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology). After concluding her Master study in 2006, she works as safety engineer in VALEOAUTOKLIMATIZACE s.r.o, Rakovnik, Czech Republic.

Ing. Tereza Nováková born 1983, studied at the Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology). After concluding her Master study in 2007, she started PhD. studies at the Institute of Chemical Technology Prague (Faculty of Environmental Technology).

References

1. Sabatini, D. A., Knox, R. C., Harwell, J. H. and Wu, B.: J. Contam. Hydrol.45 (2000) 99. 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00121-2Suche in Google Scholar

2. Butler, E. C. and Hayes, K. F.: Water Res.32 (1998) 1345. 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00360-6Suche in Google Scholar

3. Pennel, K. D., Abriola, L. M. and Weber, W. J.: Environ. Sci. Technol.27 (1993) 2332. 10.1021/es00048a005Suche in Google Scholar

4. Holmberg, K., Jönsson, B., Kronberg, B. and Lindman, B.: Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution (2004) Wiley, Chichester.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Dwarakanath, V., Kostarelos, K., Pope, G. A., Shotts, D. and Wade, W. H.: J. Contam. Hydrol.38 (1999) 465. 10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00006-6Suche in Google Scholar

6. Boving, T. B. and Brusseau, M. L.: J. Contam. Hydrol.42 (2000) 51. 10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00077-7Suche in Google Scholar

7. Zhong, L., Mayer, A. S. and Pope, G. A.: J. Contam. Hydrol.60 (2003) 55. 10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00063-3Suche in Google Scholar

8. Park, S.-K. and Bielefeldt, A. R.: Water Res.39 (2005) 1388. 10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.009Suche in Google Scholar

9. Diallo, M. S., Abriola, L. M. and Weber, W. J.: Environ. Sci. Technol.28 (1994) 1829. 10.1021/es00060a012Suche in Google Scholar

10. Garon, D., Krivobok, S., Wouessidjewe, D. and Seigle-Murandi, F.: Chemosphere47 (2002) 303. 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00299-5Suche in Google Scholar

11. Zhou, W. and Zhu, L.: Colloid. Surface. A255 (2005) 145. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.039Suche in Google Scholar

12. Kile, D. E. and Chiou, C. T.: Environ. Sci. Technol.23 (1989) 832. 10.1021/es00065a012Suche in Google Scholar

13. Li, J.-L. and Chen, B.-H.: Chem. Eng. Sci.57 (2002) 2825. 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00169-0Suche in Google Scholar

14. Jawitz, J. W., Annable, M. D., Rao, P. S. C. and Rhue, R. D.: Environ. Sci. Technol.32 (1998) 523. 10.1021/es970507iSuche in Google Scholar

15. Dwarakanath, V. and Pope, G. A.: Environ. Sci. Technol.34 (2000) 4842. 10.1021/es0009121Suche in Google Scholar

16. Zhu, M. and Rhue, R. D.: Environ. Sci. Technol.34 (2000) 1985. 10.1021/es9811546Suche in Google Scholar

17. Zhao, B., Zhu, L., Li, W. and Chen, B.: Chemosphere58 (2005) 33. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.067Suche in Google Scholar

18. Park, S. K. and Bielefeldt, A. R.: Water Res.37 (2003) 3412. 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00237-9Suche in Google Scholar

19. Sharmin, R., Ionnidis, M. A. and Legge, R. L.: J. Contam. Hydrol.82 (2006) 145. 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

20. Crook, E. H., Fordyce, D. B. and Trebbi, G. F.: J. Coll. Sci.20 (1965) 191. 10.1016/0095-8522(65)90010-3Suche in Google Scholar

21. Harusawa, F., Saito, T., Nakajima, H. and Fukushima, S.: J. Colloid Interf. Sci.74 (1980) 435. 10.1016/0021-9797(80)90212-XSuche in Google Scholar

22. Zimmerman, J., Kibbey, T. C. G., Cowell, M. A. and Hayes, K. F.: Environ. Sci. Technol.33 (1999) 169. 10.1021/es9802910Suche in Google Scholar

23. Zhao, B., Zhu, L. and Yang, K.: Chemosphere62 (2005) 772. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.080Suche in Google Scholar

24. Bernardez, L. A. and Ghoshal, S.: J. Colloid Interf. Sci.320 (2008) 298. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.12.035Suche in Google Scholar

25. Prak, D. J. L. and Pritchard, P. H.: Water Res.36 (2002) 3463. 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00070-2Suche in Google Scholar

26. Chun, C. L., Lee, J.-J. and Park, J.-W.: Environ. Pollut.118 (2002) 307. 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00304-9Suche in Google Scholar

27. Fuguet, E., Rafols, C., Rosés, M. and Bosch, E.: Anal. Chim. Acta548 (2005) 95. 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.069Suche in Google Scholar

28. Hait, S. K. and Moulik, S. P.: J. Surfactants Deterg.4 (2001) 303. 10.1007/s11743-001-0184-2Suche in Google Scholar

29. Reid, V. W., Longman, G. F. and Heinerth, E.: Tenside4 (1967) 292.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2007-10-12
Published Online: 2013-04-05
Published in Print: 2008-07-01

© 2008, Carl Hanser Publisher, Munich

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Contents/Inhalt
  2. Contents
  3. Abstracts
  4. Abstracts
  5. Analysis
  6. Identification of the Products from the Sulfonation of an Oleic Acid Methyl Ester
  7. Application
  8. Study of Adsorption of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Alumina Using Surfactant Ion-selective Electrode
  9. Foaming Power and Foam Stability of Several Alkyl Polyglycosides
  10. Environmental Chemistry
  11. Compositional Analysis and Environmental Performance of LAS Produced from GTL Normal Paraffin and Different Alkylation Routes
  12. A Biodegradation Study of Triethylene Glycol Monododecyl Ether under the Conditions of the OECD Screening Test 301E
  13. Solubilization of PCBs by Surfactant Solution: Minimization of Partitioning Loss of Surfactant
  14. Physical Chemistry
  15. Effect of Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide on the Oxidation of β-Alanine by N-Bromophthalimide in Acidic Medium
https://doi.org/10.3139/113.100378
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
Surfactants; solubilization; non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs); partitioning

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Contents/Inhalt
  2. Contents
  3. Abstracts
  4. Abstracts
  5. Analysis
  6. Identification of the Products from the Sulfonation of an Oleic Acid Methyl Ester
  7. Application
  8. Study of Adsorption of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on Alumina Using Surfactant Ion-selective Electrode
  9. Foaming Power and Foam Stability of Several Alkyl Polyglycosides
  10. Environmental Chemistry
  11. Compositional Analysis and Environmental Performance of LAS Produced from GTL Normal Paraffin and Different Alkylation Routes
  12. A Biodegradation Study of Triethylene Glycol Monododecyl Ether under the Conditions of the OECD Screening Test 301E
  13. Solubilization of PCBs by Surfactant Solution: Minimization of Partitioning Loss of Surfactant
  14. Physical Chemistry
  15. Effect of Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide on the Oxidation of β-Alanine by N-Bromophthalimide in Acidic Medium
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 18.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/113.100378/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen