Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
An Irresponsible Intrusion
-
Daniel H. Lowenstein
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
17. November 2003
Professor Lowenstein argues that the en banc 9th Circuit was correct to reinstate the Oct. 7 recall election. Blocking the election would have been an irresponsible intrusion into a state’s political system and an incorrect reading of Bush v. Gore. In addition, delaying the election would have created chaos for candidates and election officials, perhaps creating greater distortions in the electoral process than if the recall proceeded as required under the California Constitution.
Published Online: 2003-11-17
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Article
- Handicapping the 2004 Nomination Race: An Early Fall Prospectus
- George W. Bush's Presidential Project and Its Prospects
- September 11: Symbolism and Responses to "9/11"
- An Irresponsible Intrusion
- Ninth Circuit Erred in Allowing Recall Election with Punch Card Votes
- California Recall Voting: Nuggets of California Gold for Voting Behavior
- Schwarzenegger in Transition: Time to Govern
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Article
- Handicapping the 2004 Nomination Race: An Early Fall Prospectus
- George W. Bush's Presidential Project and Its Prospects
- September 11: Symbolism and Responses to "9/11"
- An Irresponsible Intrusion
- Ninth Circuit Erred in Allowing Recall Election with Punch Card Votes
- California Recall Voting: Nuggets of California Gold for Voting Behavior
- Schwarzenegger in Transition: Time to Govern
