Startseite Predator-dependent transmissible disease spreading in prey under Holling type-II functional response
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Predator-dependent transmissible disease spreading in prey under Holling type-II functional response

  • Dipankar Ghosh , Prasun K. Santra , Abdelalim A. Elsadany EMAIL logo und Ghanshaym S. Mahapatra
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. März 2021
Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A
Aus der Zeitschrift Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A Band 76 Heft 6

Abstract

This paper focusses on developing two species, where only prey species suffers by a contagious disease. We consider the logistic growth rate of the prey population. The interaction between susceptible prey and infected prey with predator is presumed to be ruled by Holling type II and I functional response, respectively. A healthy prey is infected when it comes in direct contact with infected prey, and we also assume that predator-dependent disease spreads within the system. This research reveals that the transmission of this predator-dependent disease can have critical repercussions for the shaping of prey–predator interactions. The solution of the model is examined in relation to survival, uniqueness and boundedness. The positivity, feasibility and the stability conditions of the fixed points of the system are analysed by applying the linearization method and the Jacobian matrix method.

Keywords: disease transmission; eco-epidemiological model; Hopf bifurcation; stability analysis
Corresponding author: Abdelalim A. Elsadany, Department of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj11942, Saudi Arabia; and Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Suez Canal University, Ismailia41522, Egypt, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author would like to thank the Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University for their support.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] B. Sahoo and S. Poria, “Disease control in a food chain model supplying alternative food,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 5653–5663, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] J. H. Hu, Y. K. Xue, G. Q. Sun, Z. Jin, and J. Zhang, “Global dynamics of a predator-prey system modeling by metaphysiological approach,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 283, no. C, pp. 369–384, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.02.041.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] M. Banerjee and Y. Takeuchi, “Maturation delay for the predators can enhance stable coexistence for a class of prey-predator models,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 412, pp. 154–171, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.10.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] K. P. Das, K. Kundu, and J. Chattopadhyay, “A predator-prey mathematical model with both the populations affected by diseases,” Ecol. Complex., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–80, 2011.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

[5] S. Ghorai and S. Poria, “Pattern formation and control of spatiotemporal chaos in a reaction diffusion prey-predator system supplying additional food,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 85, no. C, pp. 57–67, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.01.013.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] B. Sahoo and S. Poria, “Diseased prey predator model with general Holling type interactions,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 226, pp. 83–100, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] R. K. Upadhyay and P. Roy, “Spread of a disease and its effect on population dynamics in an eco-epidemiological system,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 4170–4184, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.04.016.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Y. H. Hsieh and C. K. Hsiao, “Predator prey model with disease infection in both populations,” Math. Med. Biol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 247–266, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqn017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] P. K. Das, K. Kundu, and J. Chattopadhyay, “A predator prey mathematical model with both the populations affected by diseases,” Ecol. Complex., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 687–708, 2011.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.001Suche in Google Scholar

[10] S. P. Bera, A. Maiti, and G. P. Samanta, “A prey-predator model with infection in both prey and predator,” Filomat, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1753–1767, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2298/fil1508753b.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] J. J. Tewa, V. Y. Djeumen, and S. Bowong, “Predator–Prey model with Holling response function of type II and SIS infectious disease,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4825–4841, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] G. Hu and X. Li, “Stability and Hopf bifurcation for a delayed predator-prey model with disease in the prey,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 229–237, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2011.11.011.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] E. Venturino, “Epidemics in predator-prey models disease in the predators,” IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol., vol. 19, pp. 185–205, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/19.3.185.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Y. N. Xiao and L. Chen, “Modelling and analysis of predator–prey model with disease in the prey,” Math. Biosci., vol. 171, pp. 59–82, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-5564(01)00049-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Y. Xie, L. Wang, Q. Deng, and Z. Wu, “The dynamics of an impulsive predator–prey model with communicable disease in the prey species only,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 292, pp. 320–335, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.07.042.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] M. Haque, “A predator-prey model with disease in the predator species only,” Nonlinear Anal. R. World Appl., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2224–2236, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.06.012.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] S. Jana, S. Guria, U. Das, T. K. Kar, and A. Ghorai, “Effect of harvesting and infection on predator in a prey–predator system,” Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 81, pp. 917–930, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2040-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] J. Chattopadhyay and O. Arino, “A predator-prey model with disease in prey,” Nonlinear Anal., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 747–766, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0362-546x(98)00126-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] X. Y. Meng, N. N. Qin, and H. F. Huo, “Dynamics analysis of a predator–prey system with harvesting prey and disease in prey species,” J. Biol. Dynam., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 342–374, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2018.1454515.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] S. Jana, S. Guria, U. Das, T. K. Kar, and A. Ghorai, “Effect of harvesting and infection on predator in a prey–predator system,” Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 81, nos 1-2, pp. 917–930, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2040-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] K. Chakraborty, K. Das, S. Haldar, and T. K. Kar, “A mathematical study of an eco-epidemiological system on disease persistence and extinction perspective,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 254, pp. 99–112, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.109.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] B. Sahoo and S. Poria, “Effects of allochthonous inputs in the control of infectious disease of prey,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 75, pp. 1–19, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.02.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] D. C. Behringer and M. J. Butler, “Disease avoidance influences shelter use and predation in Caribbean spiny lobster,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 747–755, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0892-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] F. M. Hilker and K. Schmitz, “Disease-induced stabilization of predator–prey oscillations,” J. Theor. Biol., vol. 255, pp. 299–306, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.08.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] R. D. Holt and M. Roy, “Predation can increase the prevalence of infectious disease,” Am. Nat., vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 690–699, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1086/513188.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] A. Sharp and J. Pastor, “Stable limit cycles and the paradox of enrichment in a model of chronic wasting disease,” Ecol. Appl., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1024–1030, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1449.1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] C. Tannoia, E. Torre, and E. Venturino, “An incubating diseased-predator ecoepidemic model,” J. Biol. Phys., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 705–720, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-012-9281-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] I. M. Bulai, R. Cavoretto, B. Chialva, D. Duma, and E. Venturino, “Comparing disease-control policies for interacting wild populations,” Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1881–1900, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1781-7.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] T. Hollings, M. Jones, N. Mooney, and H. McCallum, “Disease-induced decline of an apex predator drives invasive dominated states and threatens biodiversity,” Ecology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 394–405, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0204.1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] R. D. Holt and M. Roy, “Predation can increase the prevalence of infectious disease,” Am. Nat., vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 690–699, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1086/513188.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] C. Packer, R. D. Holt, P. J. Hudson, K. D. Lafferty, and A. P. Dobson, “Keeping the herds healthy and alert: implications of predator control for infectious disease,” Ecol. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 797–802, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00500.x.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] X. Y. Meng, H. F. Huo, H. Xiang, and Q. Yin, “Stability in a predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin function and stage structure for prey,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 232, no. C, pp. 810–819, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.01.139.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] G. T. Skalski and J. F. Gilliam, “Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model,” Ecol. Appl., vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 3083–3092, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3083:frwpiv]2.0.co;2.10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3083:FRWPIV]2.0.CO;2Suche in Google Scholar

[34] J. P. Tripathi, S. Tyagi, and S. Abbas, “Global analysis of a delayed density dependent predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin functional response,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., vol. 30, nos 1-3, pp. 45–69, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.06.008.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] S. Li, J. Wu, and Y. Dong, “Uniqueness and stability of a predator-prey model with C-M functional response,” Comput. Math. Appl., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1080–1095, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.03.007.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] S. Salman, A. Yousef, and A. Elsadany, “Stability, bifurcation analysis and chaos control of a discrete predator-prey system with square root functional response,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 93, pp. 20–31, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.09.020.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] B. Ghosh, F. Grognard, and L. Mailleret, “Natural enemies deployment in patchy environments for augmentative biological control,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 266, no. C, pp. 982–999, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.06.021.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] P. Panja, S. K. Mondal, and J. Chattopadhyay, “Stability, bifurcation and optimal control analysis of a malaria model in a periodic environment,” Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 627–642, 2017.10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0221Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Y. Lu, D. Li, and S. Liu, “Modeling of hunting strategies of the predators in susceptible and infected prey,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 284, no. C, pp. 268–285, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] S. Kant and V. Kumar, “Stability analysis of predator–prey system with migrating prey and disease infection in both species,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 42, pp. 509–539, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] N. Bairagi and D. Adak, “Switching from simple to complex dynamics in a predator-prey parasite model: an interplay between infection rate and incubation delay,” Math. Biosci., vol. 277, pp. 1–14, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2016.03.014.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] X. Gao, Q. Pan, M. He, and Y. Kang, “A predator-prey model with diseases in both prey and predator,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 392, no. 23, pp. 5898–5906, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.077.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] D. Xiao and S. Ruan, “Global analysis of an epidemic model with nonmonotone incidence rate,” Math. Biosci., vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 419–429, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2006.09.025.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[44] S. A. Levin, W. M. Liu, and Y. Iwasa, “Influence of nonlinear incidence rates upon the behaviour of SIRS epidemiological models,” J. Math. Biol., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 187–204, 1986.10.1007/BF00276956Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] S. Ruan and W. Wang, “Dynamical behaviour of an epidemic model with a nonlinear incidence rate,” J. Differ. Equ., vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 135–163, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0396(02)00089-x.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] C. Xu and M. Liao, “Bifurcation analysis of an autonomous epidemic predator-prey model with delay,” Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-012-0264-z.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] S. Biswas, S. K. Sasmal, S. Samanta, M. Saifuddin, and J. Chattopadhyay, “A delayed ecoepidemiological system with infected prey and predator subject to the weak Allee effect,” Math. Biosci., vol. 263, pp. 198–208, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2015.02.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Y. Wang and X. Liu, “Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a within-host chikungunya virus infection model with two delays,” Math. Comput. Simulat., vol. 138, no. C, pp. 31–48, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2016.12.011.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] R. Xu, “Mathematical analysis of the global dynamics of an eco-epidemiological model with time delay,” J. Franklin Inst., vol. 350, no. 10, pp. 3342–3364, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.08.010.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] G. Gimmelli, B. W. Kooi, and E. Venturino, “Ecoepidemic models with prey group defense and feeding saturation,” Ecol. Complex., vol. 22, pp. 50–58, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2015.02.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] E. Cagliero and E. Venturino, “Ecoepidemics with infected prey in herd defence: the harmless and toxic cases,” Int. J. Comput. Math., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 108–127, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2014.988614.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] B. W. Kooi and E. Venturino, “Ecoepidemic predator-prey model with feeding satiation, prey herd behavior and abandoned infected prey,” Math. Biosci., vol. 274, pp. 58–72, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2016.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] A. Al-khedhairi, A. Elsadany, A. Elsonbaty, and A. Abdelwahab, “Dynamical study of a chaotic predator-prey model with an omnivore,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus, vol. 133, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. 29. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-11864-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] M. Haque and E. Venturino, “The role of transmissible diseases in the Holling-Tanner predator-prey model,” Theor. Popul. Biol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 273–288, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2006.06.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Y. Zhanga, S. Chena, S. Gao, K. Fan, and Q. Wang, “A new non-autonomous model for migratory birds with Leslie–Gower Holling-type II schemes and saturation recovery rate,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 132, pp. 289–306, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2016.07.015.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, New York, Springer, 1993.10.1007/978-3-662-08542-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-12-17
Revised: 2021-03-04
Accepted: 2021-03-07
Published Online: 2021-03-29
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Atomic, Molecular & Chemical Physics
  3. Nonhomogeneous multicolor laser beams optimization to obtain a stronger intensity single harmonic radiation path
  4. Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
  5. Predator-dependent transmissible disease spreading in prey under Holling type-II functional response
  6. Static and dynamic performances of ferrofluid lubricated long journal bearing
  7. Solid State Physics & Materials Science
  8. Nonreciprocal transmission in a parity-time symmetry system with two types of defects
  9. First principles study of the structural, electronic, optical and thermodynamic properties of cubic quaternary AlxIn1−xPyBi1−y alloys
  10. Ultrasound-assisted green biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and their photocatalytic application
  11. Pressure dependent ultrasonic properties of hcp hafnium metal
  12. A comparison study of the structural electronic, elastic and lattice dynamic properties of ZrInAu and ZrSnPt
https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2020-0342
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
disease transmission; eco-epidemiological model; Hopf bifurcation; stability analysis

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Atomic, Molecular & Chemical Physics
  3. Nonhomogeneous multicolor laser beams optimization to obtain a stronger intensity single harmonic radiation path
  4. Dynamical Systems & Nonlinear Phenomena
  5. Predator-dependent transmissible disease spreading in prey under Holling type-II functional response
  6. Static and dynamic performances of ferrofluid lubricated long journal bearing
  7. Solid State Physics & Materials Science
  8. Nonreciprocal transmission in a parity-time symmetry system with two types of defects
  9. First principles study of the structural, electronic, optical and thermodynamic properties of cubic quaternary AlxIn1−xPyBi1−y alloys
  10. Ultrasound-assisted green biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and their photocatalytic application
  11. Pressure dependent ultrasonic properties of hcp hafnium metal
  12. A comparison study of the structural electronic, elastic and lattice dynamic properties of ZrInAu and ZrSnPt
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2020-0342/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen