Startseite γ-Brass type structures with I- and P-cell in the ternary Cu–Zn–In system
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

γ-Brass type structures with I- and P-cell in the ternary Cu–Zn–In system

  • Samiran Misra ORCID logo , Souvik Giri ORCID logo und Partha P. Jana ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. November 2020

Abstract

γ-Brass type phases in Cu–Zn–In ternary system were synthesized from the highly pure elements by conventional solid-state synthesis and characterized by X-ray diffraction and EDX analysis. Diffraction analysis confirmed the existence of cubic γ-brass type phases with I- and P-cell having a significant homogeneity range in the ternary Cu–Zn–In system. The phase homogeneity is connected with structural disorder based on mixed site occupancies. Site specific In substitution was observed during single-crystal structure analysis. The γ-brass structures with body-centered cubic lattice (I43m) are viewed as 26-atom γ-clusters. Like Cu5Zn8, the inner tetrahedron (IT), outer tetrahedron (OT) and octahedron (OH) sites in the 26-atom clusters of γ-brass structures with I-cell are occupied by Zn, Cu, Cu, respectively. Indium substitution is restricted to the cuboctahedral (CO) site and the CO site is assumed to be mixed with In, Cu and Zn throughout the homogeneity range. The structures of cubic γ-brass type (P43m) phases with P-cell are built up with two independent 26‐atom γ‐clusters and centered at the special positions A (0, 0, 0) and B (½, ½, ½) of the unit cell. According to the single‐crystal X‐ray analyses, In substitutions are largely restricted to the cuboctahedral sited B clusters. In the cubic γ-phases with P-cell, site occupancy pattern of cluster positioned at A is similar to the γ-cluster in Cu5Zn8, whereas cluster B bears a close resemblance to Cu-poor γ-cluster (Cu14In12) of Cu9In4 (P43m). The vec values for cubic γ-brass type phases in the Cu–Zn–In ternary system ranges between 1.57 and 1.64.


Corresponding author: Partha P. Jana, Department of Chemistry, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India, E-mail:

Funding source: Science and Engineering Research Board

Award Identifier / Grant number: ECR/2016/000329

Acknowledgment

SM acknowledges IIT Kharagpur for the Ph.D. fellowship. The authors thank Mr. Mithun Das for EDX measurements.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by funding from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India for Early Career Research Award (Grant No: ECR/2016/000329).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors also declare no competing financial interest.

References

1. Xie, W., Miller, G. J. New Co-Pd-Zn γ-brasses with dilute ferrimagnetism and Co2Zn11 revisited: establishing the synergism between theory and experiment. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 2624–2634; https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500078w.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Xie, W., Liu, J., Pecharsky, V., Miller, G. J. γ-Brasses with spontaneous magnetization: atom site preferences and magnetism in the Fe-Zn and Fe-Pd-Zn phase spaces. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2015, 641, 270–278; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201400539.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Ghanta, S., Kamboj, R., George, N. M., Jana, P. P. Formation of γ-brass type pseudo-binary Ni2Zn11-4δXδ (0≤δ≤∼0.13) (X = In and Ga) by an exchange mechanism. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 289, 4–10; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121465.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Thimmaiah, S., Crumpton, N. A., Miller, G. J. Crystal structures and stabilities of γ- and Γ′-brass phases in Pd2-xAuxZn11 (x = 0.2–0.8): vacancies vs. valence electron concentration. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2011, 637, 1992–1999; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201100357.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Gourdon, O., Miller, G. J. Intergrowth compounds in the Zn-rich Zn-Pd system: toward 1D quasicrystal approximants. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1848–1856; https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0526415.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Gourdon, O., Izaola, Z., Elcoro, L., Petricek, V., Miller, G. J. Zn1-xPdx (x = 0.14–0.24): a missing link between intergrowth compounds and quasicrystal approximants. Philos. Mag. 2006, 86, 419–425; https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430500254701.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Demange, V., Ghanbaja, J., Machizaud, F., Dubois, J. M. About γ-brass phases in the Al-Cr-Fe system and their relationships to quasicrystals and approximants. Philos. Mag. 2005, 85, 1261–1272; https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430500037049.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Spanjers, C. S., Dasgupta, A., Kirkham, M., Burger, B. A., Kumar, G., Janik, M. J., Rioux, R. M. Determination of bulk and surface atomic arrangement in Ni-Zn γ-brass phase at different Ni to Zn ratios. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 504–512; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01769.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Dasgupta, A., Zimmerer, E. K., Meyer, R. J., Rioux, R. M. Generalized approach for the synthesis of silica supported Pd-Zn, Cu-Zn and Ni-Zn gamma brass phase nanoparticles. Catal. Today 2019, 334, 231–242; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.050.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Gourdon, O., Gout, D., Williams, D. J., Proffen, T., Hobbs, S., Miller, G. J. Atomic distributions in the γ-brass structure of the Cu-Zn system: a structural and theoretical study. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 251–260; https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0616380.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Che, G. C., Ellner, M. Powder crystal data for the high-temperature phases Cu4In, Cu9In4 (h) and Cu2In (h). Powder Diffr. 1992, 7, 107–108; https://doi.org/10.1017/s0885715600018340.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Booth, M. H., Brandon, J. K., Brizard, R. Y., Chieh, C., Pearson, W. B. γ-Brasses with F Cells. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B 1977, 33, 30–36; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740877002556.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Arnberg, L., Jonsson, A., Westman, S. The structure of the delta-phase in the Cu-Sn system. A phase of gamma-brass type with an 18 A superstructure. Acta Chem. Scand. 1976, 30A, 187–192; https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.30a-0187.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Brandon, J. K., Kim, H. S., Pearson, W. B. The crystallographic analysis of InMn3, a new form of γ-brass structure with a P cell. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B 1979, 35, 1937–1944; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740879008207.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Brandon, J. K., Brizard, R. Y., Pearson, W. B., Tozer, D. J. N. γ-Brasses with I and P cells. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B 1977, 33, 527–537; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740877003987.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Puselj, M., Schubert, K. Crystal-structures of Au9In4(H) and Au7In3. J. Less-Common MET. 1975, 41, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(75)90091-0.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Kisi, E. H., Browne, J. D. Ordering and structural vacancies in non‐stoichiometric Cu–Al γ brasses. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B 1991, 47, 835–843; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768191005694.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Kwon, J., Thuinet, L., Avettand-Fènoël, M. N., Legris, A., Besson, R. Point defects and formation driving forces of complex metallic alloys: atomic-scale study of Al4Cu9. Intermetallics 2014, 46, 250–258; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2013.11.023.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Stokhuyzen, R., Brandon, J. K., Chieh, P. C., Pearson, W. B. Copper–gallium, γ1 Cu9Ga4. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. B 1974, 30, 2910–2911; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740874008478.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Bradley, A. J., Thewlis, J. The structure of γ-brass. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1926, 112, 678.10.1098/rspa.1926.0134Suche in Google Scholar

21. Lord, E. A., Ranganathan, S. The γ-brass structure and the Boerdijk-Coxeter helix. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2004, 334–335, 121–125; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.11.069.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Brandon, B. Y. J. K., Chieh, P. C., Mcmillan, R. K., Pearson, W. B. New refinements of the γ brass type structures Cu5Zn8, Cu5Cd8 and Fe3Zn10. Acta Crystallogr. B. 1974, 30, 1412–1417; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740874004997.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Misra, S., Pahari, D., Giri, S., Puravankara, S., Jana, P. P. Synthesis, crystal structures, phase width and electrochemical performances of γ-brass type phases in Cu-Zn-Sn system. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 855, 157372–157384.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157372Suche in Google Scholar

24. Kanlayasiri, K., Mongkolwongrojn, M., Ariga, T. Influence of indium addition on characteristics of Sn-0.3Ag-0.7Cu solder alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 485, 225–230; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.020.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Sharif, A., Chan, Y. C. Effect of indium addition in Sn-rich solder on the dissolution of Cu metallization. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 390, 67–73; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.08.023.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Chang, R. W., Patrick McCluskey, F. Reliability assessment of indium solder for low temperature electronic packaging. Cryogenics 2009, 49, 630–634; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2009.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Villars, P., Cenzual, K. Pearson’s Crystal Data – Crystal Structure Database for Inorganic Compounds (DVD Software Version 2.2b), Release 2018/19; ASM INTERNATIONAL: Materials Park, Ohio, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Apex Suite of Crystallographic Software; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Petricek, V., Dusek, M., Palatinus, L. The crystallographic computing system, JANA2006: general features. Z. Kristallogr. 2014, 229, 345–352.10.1515/zkri-2014-1737Suche in Google Scholar

30. Palatinus, L., Chapuis, G. SUPERFLIP – a computer program for the solution of crystal structures by charge flipping in arbitrary dimensions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 786–790; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889807029238.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Brandenburg, K., Putz, H. Crystal Impact (Version 3.0); Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

32. McCusker, L. B., Von Dreele, R. B., Cox, D. E., Louër, D., Scardi, P. Rietveld refinement guidelines. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 36–50; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0021889898009856.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2020-0079).


Received: 2020-09-09
Accepted: 2020-10-31
Published Online: 2020-11-24
Published in Print: 2020-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zkri-2020-0079/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen