Startseite Forschungskooperationen bei kritischen Technologien: Europas strategischer Balanceakt
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Forschungskooperationen bei kritischen Technologien: Europas strategischer Balanceakt

  • André Wolf EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. November 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The ongoing debate on the EU’s economic security is creating a cautious attitude towards cooperation with third countries, including joint innovation. Yet, in particular for technologies considered critical, a regular cross-border exchange of knowledge and ideas is indispensable for innovation success. By drawing on comprehensive global patent data, this article investigates patterns of EU research cooperation for six critical technology fields: advanced materials, AI, biotechnologies, connectivity, energy and semiconductor technologies. In terms of the extent of patenting activity, the EU does not possess comparative technological advantages in any of the technology fields investigated. At the same time, EU patents resulting from research cooperations with third countries received a significantly higher number of citations than those with purely domestic inventors. To optimally exploit the benefits of international research collaboration, the EU should develop a dedicated technology cooperation strategy. It should involve a smart diversification of research partners with focus on Japan and South Korea, the integration of cooperation partners into internal research support schemes and the merging of bilateral partnerships to plurilateral technology clubs.

JEL Classification: O31; O38; F23; F53

Literatur

ATI (2021), Advanced Technologies for Industry – Methodological report, Indicator framework and data calculations, September 2021.Suche in Google Scholar

Australien/Europäische Union (1994), Agreement relating to scientific and technical cooperation between the European Community and Australia, OJ L 188, 22.7.1994, S. 18 – 25.Suche in Google Scholar

Caloghirou, Yannis, Hondroyiannis, George und Nicholas S. Vonortas (2003), „The performance of research partnerships“, Managerial and Decision Economics, Jg. 24, Heft 2, S. 85–99.10.1002/mde.1087Suche in Google Scholar

COST (2024), Growing ideas through networks, European Cooperation in Science and Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Edler, Jakob, Blind, Knut, Kroll, Henning und Torben Schubert (2023), „Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy“, Research Policy, Jg. 52, Heft 6, S. 104765.10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765Suche in Google Scholar

EPO (2024), PATSTAT – Backbone dataset for statistical analysis, European Patent Office.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2021), EU-US launch Trade and Technology Council to lead values-based global digital transformation, Press Release, 15 June 2021.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2023a), Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council on „European Economic Security Strategy“, JOIN(2023) 20 final.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2023b), Commission Recommendation of 3.10.2023 on critical technology areas for the EU’s economic security for further risk assessment with Member States, COM(2023) 6689 final.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2024a), Proposal for a Council Recommendation on enhancing research security, COM(2024) 26 final.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2024b), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council, COM(2024) 23 final.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Kommission (2024c), Horizon Europe, Research and Innovation.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Union (2011), Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation in science and technology, OJ L 90, 06.04.2011, S. 2–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Union (2024), EU-US Trade and Technology Council 2021–24. Factsheet.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Union/Japan (2018), Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part, OJ L 216, 24.8.2018, S. 4–22.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Union/Kanada (2016), Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part, OJ L 329, 03.12.2016, S. 45–65.Suche in Google Scholar

Europäische Union/Republik Korea (2022), European Union-Republic of Korea Digital Partnership.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Steffi und Brigitte van Beuzekom (2018), Revised proposal for the revision of the statistical definitions of biotechnology and nanotechnology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2018/01, OECD Publishing, Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Georghiou, Luke (1998), „Global cooperation in research“, Research Policy, Jg. 27, Heft 6, S. 611–626.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00054-7Suche in Google Scholar

Grammes, Nadja, Millenaar, Dominic, Fehlmann, Tobias, Kern, Fabian, Böhm, Michael, Mahfoud, Felix und Andreas Keller (2020), „Research output and international cooperation among countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: scientometric analysis“, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Jg. 22, Heft 12, S. e24514.10.2196/24514Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Brownyn H., Link, Abert N. und John T. Scott (2003), „Universities as research partners“, Review of Economics and Statistics, Jg. 85, Heft 2, S. 485–491.10.1162/rest.2003.85.2.485Suche in Google Scholar

Hagedoorn, John, Link, Albert N. und Nicholas S. Vonortas (2000), „Research partnerships“, Research Policy, Jg. 29, Heft 4, S. 567–586.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6Suche in Google Scholar

Harrison, Jeffrey S., Hitt, Michael A., Hoskisson, Robert E. und R. Duane Ireland (2001), „Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances“, Journal of Management, Jg. 27, Heft 6, S. 679–690.10.1177/014920630102700605Suche in Google Scholar

Katz, Michael L. (1986), „An analysis of cooperative research and development“, The RAND Journal of Economics, Jg. 17, Heft 4, S. 527–543.10.2307/2555479Suche in Google Scholar

Laursen, Keld (2015), „Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization“, Eurasian Business Review, Jg. 5, Heft 1, S. 99–115.10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1Suche in Google Scholar

Mascarenhas, Carla, Ferreira, João J. und Carla Marques (2018), „University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda“, Science and Public Policy, Jg. 45, Heft 5, S. 708–718.10.1093/scipol/scy003Suche in Google Scholar

Noseleit, Florian und Pedro de Faria (2013), „Complementarities of internal R&D and alliances with different partner types“, Journal of Business Research, Jg. 66, Heft 10, S. 2000–2006.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.025Suche in Google Scholar

OECD (2024), Intellectual property (IP) statistics and analysis, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Regalo, Steven (2024), Deepening EU-Japan-US Cooperation on Critical and Emerging Technologies, Commentary, 7 May 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Rhoades, Stephen A. (1993), „The Herfindahl-Hirschman index“, Federal Reserve Bulletin, Jg. 79, Heft 3, S. 188–189.Suche in Google Scholar

ScienceBusiness (2024), South Korea joins Horizon Europe in multi-billion euro push to globalise science, News, 25 March 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

Squicciarini, Mariagrazia, Dernis, Hélène und Chiara Criscuolo (2013), „Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value“, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Nr. 2013(3).Suche in Google Scholar

Vonortas, Nicholas S. (2012), Cooperation in research and development, Springer Science & Business Media.Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. (1996), The mechanisms of governance, Oxford university press.10.1093/oso/9780195078244.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

WIPO (2024), International Patent Classification (IPC), World Intellectual Property Organization.Suche in Google Scholar

Wydra, Sven (2020), „Measuring innovation in the bioeconomy–Conceptual discussion and empirical experiences“, Technology in Society, Jg. 61, Heft 5, S. 101242.10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101242Suche in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2024-11-13
Erschienen im Druck: 2025-03-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfwp-2024-2021/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen