The impact of recurrent propositions on readers’ perceptions of gist: A study of hard news

References

Bell, Alan. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and Written English. Longman: Harlow.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.23Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren. 2006. From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4). 411–433.10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04cheSuche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John Sinclair & Martin Warren. 2009. Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics 30(2). 236–252.10.1093/applin/amn039Suche in Google Scholar

Greaves, Chris. 2009. ConcGram 1.0: A phraseological search engine. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/cls.1Suche in Google Scholar

Gutwinski, Waldemar. 1976. Cohesion in literary texts. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783111352176Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London & New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203431269Suche in Google Scholar

Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (ed.), Understanding reading comprehension, 181–219. Delaware: International Reading Association.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 1991. Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual interaction. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael & Matthew O’Donnell. 2008. Lexicology, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicology 21(3). 293–309.10.1093/ijl/ecn025Suche in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan. 2008. Starting with the small words: Patterns, lexis and semantic sequences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3). 271–295.10.1075/bct.22.02hunSuche in Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter & Janice Keenan. 1974. Recall of propositions as a function of their position in the hierarchical structure. In W. Kintsch (ed.), The representation of meaning in memory, 137–140. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter & Teun Van Dijk. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychology Review 85 (4). 363–394.10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Yuan ke. 2012. Cohesion in text and text aboutness. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Yuan ke & Michael Hoey. 2014. Strategies of writing summaries for hard news texts: A text analysis approach. Discourse Studies 16(1). 89–105.10.1177/1461445613496356Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Mei hua & George Braine. 2005. Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System 33(4). 623–636.10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Milizia, Denise. 2010. Keywords and phrases in political speeches. In Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds.), Keyness in texts, 127–145. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.41.10milSuche in Google Scholar

O’keeffe, Anne, Michael McCarthy & Ronald Carter. 2007. From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497650Suche in Google Scholar

Parsons, Gerald. 1991. Cohesions and coherence: Scientific texts. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, Department of English Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Phillips, Martin. 1989. Lexical structure of text. Birmingham: ELR, University of Birmingham.Suche in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06raySuche in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike & Christopher Tribble. 2006. Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.22Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2005. Document relativity. Italy: Tuscan Word Centre.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John, Susan Jones & Robert Daley. 1970. English collocation studies: The OSTI report. London & New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 2004. On very frequent phrases in English: Distribution, functions and structures [EB/OL]. http://www. uni-trier.de/uni/fb2/anglistik/projeke/stubbs/icame-2004.htm (accessed 9 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun. 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Ventola, Eija. 1987. The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Dongfeng. 2009. Coherence and translation. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Martin. 2010. Identifying aboutgrams in engineering text. In Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds.), Keyness in texts, 113–126. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.41.09warSuche in Google Scholar

White, Peter. 1997. Death, disruption and the moral order: The narrative impulse in mass-media “hard news” reporting. In M. Toolan (ed.), Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics, Vol. 3, 390–424. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry. 2004. Text, context, and pre-text: Critical issues in discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470758427Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenxing & Ying Sun. 2012. The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics & Education 23(1). 31–48.10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Yongsheng, Lixin Zheng & Xingwei Miao. 2001. A contrastive study of cohesion in English and Chinese. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar