Structural semiology, Peirce, and biolinguistics

References

Andrews, Edna. 1990. Markedness theory: The union of asymmetry and semiosis in language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv120qs2wSuche in Google Scholar

Anttila, Raimo. 1972. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, Tyler J. 2021. Detotalization and retroactivity: Black pyramid semiotics. Tartu: University of Tartu PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Sémiologie de la langue (1). Semiotica 1(1). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Bisanz, Elize, Scott R. Cunningham, Clyde Hendrick, Levi Johnson, Kenneth Laine Ketner, Thomas McLaughlin & Michael O’Boyle. 2011. Peirce’s nonreduction and relational completeness claims (CP 3.421): In the context of first-order predicate logic. KODIKAS/CODE 34. 3–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damian, Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen. 2016. Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(39). 10818–10823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113.Suche in Google Scholar

Burch, Robert W. 1992. Valental aspects of Peircean algebraic logic. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 23(6). 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(92)90128-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Burch, Robert W. 1997. Peirce’s reduction thesis. In Nathan Houser, Don D. Roberts & James Van Evra (eds.), Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, 234–251. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chávez Barreto, Eugenio I. 2019. Funktionskreis and the stratificational model of semiotic structures: Jakob von Uexküll, Luis Prieto and Louis Hjelmslev. Sign Systems Studies 47(1/2). 69. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2019.47.1-2.02.Suche in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1980. A thousand plateaus. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Denton, Michael J., Craig Marshall & Michael Legge. 2002. The protein folds as Platonic forms: New support for the pre-Darwinian conception of evolution by natural law. Journal of Theoretical Biology 219(3). 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3128.Suche in Google Scholar

Diatka, Vojtěch & Jiří Milička. 2017. The effect of iconicity flash blindness: An empirical study. In Angelika Zirker, Mathhias Bauer, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljunberg (eds.), Dimensions of iconicity, 3–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.15.01diaSuche in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1884. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga & Max Nänny (eds.). 2001. The motivated sign. In Iconicity in language and literature, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.2Suche in Google Scholar

Fontanille, Jacques. 1992. Approche morphodynamique de l’iconicité des stemmas. In Françoise Madray-Lesigne & Jeannine Richard-Zappela (eds.), Lucien Tesnière aujourd’hui, 105–112. Louvain & Paris: Editions Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, Michael S. 2018. The consciousness instinct. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Suche in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2007. Iconicity in the grammar-lexis interface. In Elżbieta Tabakowska, Olga Fisher & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Iconicity in language and literature, 269–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.5.23glySuche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary, vol. 10. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & William T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598). 1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.Suche in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1928. Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: A. F. Host.Suche in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1935. La catégorie des cas: étude de grammaire générale (Acta Jutlandica 7[1]). Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget i Aarhus.Suche in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1954. La stratification du langage. Word 10(2–3). 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659521.Suche in Google Scholar

Hjelmslev, Louis. 1957 [1943]. Prolegomena to a theory of language, Francis Whitfield (trans.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ketner, Kenneth (ed.). 2012. The Ralph Gregory Beil memorial volume: Papers in theoretical physics (Peirce studies number 9). Lubbock, TX: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism, Texas Tech University.Suche in Google Scholar

Krivochen, Diego G. & Ľudmila Lacková. 2020. Iconicity in syntax and the architecture of linguistic theory. Studies in Language 44(1). 95–131. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19017.lac.Suche in Google Scholar

Lacková, Ľudmila. 2016. Topic and focus as instruments for a contrastive analysis: Iconicity of functional sentence. Perspective in French and Italian. In Paola Dardano (ed.), Grammatiche e grammatici. Teorie, testi e contesti. Atti del XXXIX Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, 261–266. Rome: Il Calamo.Suche in Google Scholar

Lacková, Ľudmila. 2019. Towards a processual approach in protein studies. Biosemiotics 12(6). 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09370-y.Suche in Google Scholar

Lacková, Ľudmila. 2022. Participative opposition applied. Sign Systems Studies 50(2–3). 261–285. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Lacková, Ľudmila & Lukáš Zámečník. 2020. Logical principles of a topological explanation. Chinese Semiotic Studies 16(3). 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2020-0027.Suche in Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien. 1927. L’âme primitive. Paris: Félix Alcan.Suche in Google Scholar

Markoš, Anton & Jana Švorcová. 2019. Epigenetic processes and evolution of life. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.10.1201/9781351009966Suche in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 1999. Peircean semiotics in the study of iconicity in language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35(3). 613–619.Suche in Google Scholar

Paolucci, Claudio. 2006. Lucien Tesnière autore della logica dei relativi: Su alcune insospettate corrispondenze tra Peirce e lo strutturalismo. E/C 1. 1–16.Suche in Google Scholar

Pattee, Howard H. 2008. Physical and functional conditions for symbols, codes, and languages. Biosemiotics 1. 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9012-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1870. Description of a notation for the logic of relatives, resulting from an amplification of the conceptions of Boole’s calculus of logic. Cambridge, MA: Welch, Bigelow.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1877. The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12. 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.]Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 2009 [1897]. Logic of relatives. In Elize Bisanz (ed.), The logic of interdisciplinarity: Charles S. Peirce, The Monist series, 186–229. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.10.1524/9783050047331.186Suche in Google Scholar

Pelkey, Jamin. 2013. Analogy, automation, and diagrammatic causation: The evolution of Tibeto-Burman *lak. Studies in Language 37(1). 144–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.1.04pel.Suche in Google Scholar

Pelkey, Jamin. 2015a. Deep congruence between linguistic and biotic growth: Evidence for semiotic foundations. In Ekaterina Velmezova, Stephen J. Cowley & Kalevi Kull (eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics, 97–119. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-20663-9_6Suche in Google Scholar

Pelkey, Jamin. 2015b. Peircean evolutionary linguistics: A prospectus. In Jamin Pelkey, Stéphanie Walsh Matthews & Leonard Sbrocchi (eds.), Semiotics 2014: The semiotics of paradox, 585–597. Ottawa: Legas.10.5840/cpsem201446Suche in Google Scholar

Pelkey, Jamin. 2020. Peircean semiotic for language and linguistics. In Tony Jappy (ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to contemporary Peircean semiotics, 391–418. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781350076143.ch-14Suche in Google Scholar

Prieto, Luis J. 1975. Pertinence et pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Frances W. 2006. C. S. Peirce’s system of science: Life as a laboratory. Elsah, IL: The Press of Arisbe Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Michael. 1983. The sense of grammar: Language as semeiotic. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tesnière, Lucien. 2015 [1959]. Elements of structural syntax, Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane (trans.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamin.10.1075/z.185Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, D’Arcy Wentworth. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vepřek, Miroslav. 2015. Komparativní tvarosloví staroslověnštiny a staré češtiny [Comparative morphology of ancient Slavic and old Czech]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.Suche in Google Scholar