Home Ritualism and disempowerment of education: social semiotics of the educational experience of young Iranian girls
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ritualism and disempowerment of education: social semiotics of the educational experience of young Iranian girls

  • Mahdi Kermani EMAIL logo and Zahra Baradarankashani
Published/Copyright: June 7, 2023

Abstract

Despite recent noticeable changes in women’s educational opportunities in developing countries such as Iran, there is still much controversy surrounding the common assumption that a direct relationship exists between women’s empowerment and formal literacy. According to the social semiotic method, the present research explores the hidden side of the female educational experience and its relationship with empowerment. In the current study, we conducted 39 interviews and analyzed the collected data using Van Leeuwen’s semiotic approach. The results are based on the analysis of three semiotic sources, all of which are ubiquitous in the daily life of Iranian students: uniforms, queues, and homework. The findings indicate that the emphasis on the ideological aspects of educational experiences, in the form of a ritualistic approach by the educational system’s agents, causes a gradual semantic break between students and educational goals. Such an emphasis also instills an ambiguous and contradictory understanding in the student’s mind, of which the final result is the alienation and internalization of passive patterns of social action.


Corresponding author: Mahdi Kermani, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, E-mail:

References

Apple, Michael W. & Nancy R. King. 1977. What do schools teach? Curriculum Inquiry 6(4). 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11075550.Search in Google Scholar

Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. Art and visual perception. Berkeley & CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520351271Search in Google Scholar

Arns, Jaymie. 2017. Undressing the dress codes: An analysis of gender in high school dress code policies. California State University Master’s thesis. https://scholars.csus.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01CALS_USL&filePid=13233868550001671&download=true (accessed 19 September 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Bayanfar, Fatemeh. 2013. The effects of hidden curriculum on affective characteristics outcome of high school. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 4(10). 3192–3197.Search in Google Scholar

Bezemer, Jeff, Sophia Diamantopoulou, Carey Jewitt, Gunther Kress & Diane Mavers. 2012. Using a social semiotic approach to multimodality: Researching learning in schools, museums and hospitals. National Center for Research Methods working paper.Search in Google Scholar

Bodine, Ann. 2003. School uniforms and discourses on childhood. Childhood 10(1). 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568203010001003.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, Richard Nice (trans.). Cambridge & MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre & Jean-Claude Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Brezinka, Wolfgang. 1992. Philosophy of educational knowledge: An introduction to the foundations of science of education, philosophy of education, and practical pedagogics. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-011-2586-4Search in Google Scholar

Brunsma, David L. & Kerry A. Rockquemore. 1998. Effects of student uniforms on attendance, behavior problems, substance use, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research 92(1). 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597575.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Carin. 2013. Youth culture and discipline at a school in the Western Cape. Stellenbosch University PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Caruso, Peter. 1996. Individuality vs. conformity: The issue behind school uniforms. NASSP Bulletin 80(581). 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659608058121.Search in Google Scholar

Charles, Claire E. 2010. Complicating hetero‐femininities: Young women, sexualities and “girl power” at school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23(1). 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390903447135.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, James. 2009. Social reproduction in classrooms and schools. Annual Review of Anthropology 38. 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085242.Search in Google Scholar

Coloroso, Barbara. 2003. The bully, the bullied, and the bystander. New York: Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Corno, Lyn & Jianzhong Xu. 2004. Homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice 43(3). 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_9.Search in Google Scholar

Cosden, Merith, Gale Morrison, Ann L. Albanese & Sandra Macias. 2001. When homework is not home work: After-school programs for homework assistance. Educational Psychologist 36(3). 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3603_6.Search in Google Scholar

Coutts, Pamela M. 2004. Meanings of homework and implications for practice. Theory Into Practice 43(3). 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_3.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: University of Nebraska–Lincoln.Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, Paul & Ulla Gustafsson. 2010. School lunches: Children’s services or children’s spaces? Children’s Geographies 8(3). 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2010.494865.Search in Google Scholar

Danielsson, Kristina. 2016. Modes and meaning in the classroom: The role of different semiotic resources to convey meaning in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education 35. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John & Inna Semetsky. 2017. Semiotics, edusemiotics, and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(3). 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1190265.Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, Janet S., David A. Kinney & Sandra L. Hofferth. 2003. Parental ideologies and children’s after-school activities. American Behavioral Scientist 46(10). 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203046010006.Search in Google Scholar

Fabelo, Tony, Michael D. Thompson, Martha Plotkin, Dottie Carmichael, Miner P. Marchbanks & Eric A. Booth. 2011. Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng & Kay L. O’Halloran. 2012. Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 44(14). 2067–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1995 [1975]. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Alan Sheridan (trans.). New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony & Phillip W. Sutton. 2017. Essential concepts in sociology. Hoboken & NJ: John Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Giroux, Henry. 1983. Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review 53(3). 257–293. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.53.3.a67x4u33g7682734.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber & James Holstein. 2003. Analyzing interpretive practice. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna Lincoln (eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 214–248. Thousand Oaks & CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hertz, Carrie. 2007. The uniform: As material, as symbol, as negotiated object. Midwestern Folklore 32(1/2). 43–56.Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, Robert. 2014. Social semiotics. In Toby Miller (ed.), The Routledge companion to global popular culture, 58–66. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203081846-12Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, Robert & Gunther Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Ithaca & NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Illich, Ivan. 1971. Deschooling society. New York: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Illich, Ivan. 2006. Deschooling society. In Eugene F. Provenzo (ed.), Critical issues in education: An anthology of readings, 120–126. Thousand Oaks & CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Izadi, Dariush. 2017. Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics 27(4). 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334401.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Mikael. 2007. Defining lifestyle. Environmental Sciences 4(2). 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430701472747.Search in Google Scholar

Kinsella, Sharon. 2002. What’s behind the fetishism of Japanese school uniforms? Fashion Theory 6(2). 215–237. https://doi.org/10.2752/136270402778869046.Search in Google Scholar

Kohn, Alfie. 2007. Rethinking homework. Principal 86(3). 35.10.12968/sece.2007.2.256Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga. 1995. The social semiotics of Georgian toast performances: Oral genre as cultural activity. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4). 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00063-k.Search in Google Scholar

Kraft, Jacquelyn A. 2003. Society’s perceptions and attitudes toward school uniforms. University of Wisconsin Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Kupchik, Aaron. 2009. Things are tough all over: Race, ethnicity, class and school discipline. Punishment & Society 11(3). 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474509334552.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, James. 2017. Semiotizing the student perception of learning outcomes in British higher education. Social Semiotics 27(2). 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1189234.Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Peter K. 1987. Semiotics and fieldwork (qualitative research methods). London: Sage.10.4135/9781412985826Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2009. Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20(1). 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1988. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Martin Milligan (trans.). Amherst & NY: Prometheus.Search in Google Scholar

Meadmore, Daphne & Colin Symes. 1996. Of uniform appearance: A symbol of school discipline and governmentality. Discourse 17(2). 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630960170206.Search in Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 2017. Social structure and anomie. In Jacqueline Schneider (ed.), Gangs, 3–13. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351157803-1Search in Google Scholar

Moradkhani, Homayoon. 2017. Practices of Hijab discoursization after Islamic revolution. Sociological Review 24(1). 171–203.Search in Google Scholar

Moradkhani, Homayoon, Mohammad Taghi Sabzei & Vahid Akrami. 2017. The rationality of the school and its citizenship system: A case study of Delfan boys’ high schools. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research 6(11). 103–120.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Edward W. 2005. “Tuck in that shirt!”: Race, class, gender, and discipline in an urban school. Sociological Perspectives 48(1). 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2005.48.1.25.Search in Google Scholar

Myles, Brenda S. & Richard L. Simpson. 2001. Understanding the hidden curriculum: An essential social skill for children and youth with Asperger syndrome. Intervention in School and Clinic 36(5). 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345120103600504.Search in Google Scholar

Nouwen, Rick. 2011. Foundations of semantics II: Composition. https://www.gist.ugent.be/file/217 (accessed 3 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Olteanu, Alin. 2017. Reading history: Education, semiotics, and edusemiotics. In Inna Semetsky (ed.), Edusemiotics: A handbook, 193–205. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_14Search in Google Scholar

Park, Lora E., Ann Marie DiRaddo & Rachel M. Calogero. 2009. Sociocultural influence and appearance-based rejection sensitivity among college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly 33(1). 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01478.x.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Jo. 2008. Foucault, space, and primary school dining rooms. Children’s Geographies 6(4). 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802338114.Search in Google Scholar

Pike, Jo. & Derek Colquhoun. 2009. The relationship between policy and place: The role of school meals in addressing health inequalities. Health Sociology Review 18(1). 50–60. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.18.1.50.Search in Google Scholar

Pilcher, Jane. 2010. What not to wear? Girls, clothing and “showing” the body. Children & Society 24(6). 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00239.x.Search in Google Scholar

Rahaman, Mohammad S., Margaret Hamilton & Flora D. Salim. 2017. Predicting imbalanced taxi and passenger queue contexts in airport. In PACIS 2017 proceedings, 172. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/172/ (accessed 3 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Rao, Sally & Chad Perry. 2003. Convergent interviewing to build a theory in under-researched areas: Principles and an example investigation of internet usage in inter-firm relationships. Qualitative Market Research 6(4). 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310495328.Search in Google Scholar

Riege, Andreas M. 2003. Validity and reliability tests in case study research: A literature review with “hands-on” applications for each research phase. Qualitative Market Research 6(2). 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470055.Search in Google Scholar

Ritzer, George. 1983. Contemporary sociological theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Ritzer, George & Douglas J. Goodman. 2002. Modern sociological theories. New York: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna. 2007. Towards a semiotic theory of learning: Deleuze’s philosophy and educational experience. Semiotica 164(1/4). 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem.2007.025.Search in Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 2011. Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skaar, Håvard. 2007. Digitalized story-making in the classroom: A social semiotic perspective on gender, multimodality and learning. Seminar.Net 3(1). https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2513/2417 (accessed 19 September 2023).10.7577/seminar.2513Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Stephanie. 2007. A uniform identity: Schoolgirl snapshots and the spoken visual. History of Education 36(2). 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600601171468.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Jon. 2002. The right stuff: Fashioning an identity through clothing in a junior school. Gender and Education 14(1). 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120098889.Search in Google Scholar

Thomassen, Lasse. 2010. Habermas: A guide for the perplexed. New York: A&C Black.Search in Google Scholar

Törrönen, Jukka. 2002. Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewing using stimulus texts. Qualitative Research 2(3). 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200304.Search in Google Scholar

Ulasewicz, Connie. 2007. Girls’ juvenile justice uniforms: A semiotic analysis of their meaning. Feminist Criminology 2(2). 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085106296499.Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, music, sound. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203647028Search in Google Scholar

Van Voorhis, Francis L. 2001. Interactive science homework: An experiment in home and school connections. NASSP Bulletin 85(627). 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650108562703.Search in Google Scholar

Vannini, Phillip. 2004. Toward an interpretive analytics of the sign: Interactionism, power, and semiosis (and George W. Bush). In Norman K. Denzin (ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction, 149–174. Bingley: Emerald.10.1016/S0163-2396(04)27012-0Search in Google Scholar

Vannini, Phillip. 2007. Social semiotics and fieldwork: Method and analytics. Qualitative Inquiry 13(1). 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406295625.Search in Google Scholar

Vannini, Phillip & Aaron M. McCright. 2004. To die for: The semiotic seductive power of the tanned body. Symbolic Interaction 27(3). 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2004.27.3.309.Search in Google Scholar

Yamagata-Lynch, Lisa C., Anne L. Skutnik, Erin Garty & Jaewoo Do. 2016. Interactionist qualitative research as a semiotic mediation activity. Sage Open 6(3). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/2158244016666889 (accessed 19 September 2023).10.1177/2158244016666889Search in Google Scholar

Zur, Ayala & Rivka A. Eisikovits. 2011. School as a place: A phenomenological method for contemplating school environments. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 24(4). 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.497175.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-03-15
Accepted: 2023-05-01
Published Online: 2023-06-07
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2023-0036/html
Scroll to top button