Startseite Semiotic ladder: the schema of producing meanings in narrative
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Semiotic ladder: the schema of producing meanings in narrative

  • Mohammad Ali Mahmoodi EMAIL logo und Fatemeh Savab
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Mai 2023

Abstract

A model called the “semiotic ladder,” which consists of “consecutive semiotic squares,” is proposed in this paper, through which the meanings of the deep structure of a narrative can be depicted as fluid and dynamic. It shows the stages of producing meanings in the narrative, from beginning to end. To see this, several narratives in the epic and mythological genres are analyzed in order to discover their abstract and deep structural meanings, and to prove the dynamic nature of meaning in the semiotic ladder. According to the analysis, the process of the semiotic ladder depicts the displacement and fluidity of narrative meanings using consecutive semiotic squares, and this pattern can be applied to and implemented in all narratives. Also, the semiotic ladder allows us to clearly observe the pattern of movement of the narrative subject schema in the path of accomplishing the object.


Corresponding author: Mohammad Ali Mahmoodi, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran, E-mail:

Funding source: Iran National Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 98029253

  1. Research funding: Supported by “Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)- Code: 98029253”.

References

Assaf, Dan, Yochai Cohen, Marcel Danesi & Yair Neuman. 2015. Opposition theory and computational semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 43(2/3). 159–172. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2015.43.2-3.01.Suche in Google Scholar

Debroy, Bibek. 2017. The Valmiki Ramayana, vol. 3. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Gaiman, Neil. 2017. Norse mythology. New York: W. W. Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Green, Keith & Jill LeBihan. 2001. Critical theory and practice: A coursebook. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Green, Roger Lancelyn. 2009. Tales of the Greek heroes. London: Puffin Classics.Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987a. De l’imperfection. Paris: Fanlac.Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987b. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1988. Maupassant: The semiotics of text. Practical exercises (Semiotic Crossroads 1), Paul Perron (trans.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamin.10.1075/sc.1Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien, Paul Ricoeur, Paul Perron & Frank Collins. 1989. On narrativity. New Literary History 20(3). 551–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/469353.Suche in Google Scholar

Guiraud, Pierre. 2004. La semiologia. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Suche in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2011. Tools for text and image analysis: An introduction to applied semiotics, Julie Tabler (trans.). https://nicole-everaert-semio.be/PDF/fr/Tools-for-Texts-and-Images.pdf (accessed 1 March 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, Luc & Bart Vervaeck. 2005. Handbook of narrative analysis. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kindt, Tom & Hans-Harald Müller. 2003. What is narratology? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110202069Suche in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2005. Les interactions risquées. Limoges: Pulim.Suche in Google Scholar

Makaryk, Irene. 1993. Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: Approaches, scholars, terms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442674417Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Bronwen & Felizitas Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of semiotics. London: Cassell.Suche in Google Scholar

Mcquillan, Martin. 2002. The narrative reader. London: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203459065Suche in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk46Suche in Google Scholar

Robichaud, Daniel. 2002. Greimas’ semiotics and the analysis of organizational action. In Kecheng Liu, Rodney J. Clarke, Peter B. Anderson & Ronald K. Stamper (eds.), Coordination and communication using signs: Studies in organizational semiotics 2, 129–149. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-1-4615-0803-8_6Suche in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Donna. 1994. World mythology: An anthology of the great myths and epics. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.Suche in Google Scholar

Saidova, Raykhonoy Abduganievna. 2020. Semiotic square and binary opposition. Theoretical & Applied Science 2. 201–205. https://doi.org/10.15863/tas.2020.02.82.37.Suche in Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2011. Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-05
Accepted: 2023-01-13
Published Online: 2023-05-12
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0142/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen