The guilty brain: the utility of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies in forensic field
-
Francesca Mameli
, Cristina Scarpazza , Emanuele Tomasini , Roberta Ferrucci , Fabiana Ruggiero , Giuseppe Sartori und Alberto Priori
Abstract
Several studies have aimed to address the natural inability of humankind to detect deception and accurately discriminate lying from truth in the legal context. To date, it has been well established that telling a lie is a complex mental activity. During deception, many functions of higher cognition are involved: the decision to lie, withholding the truth, fabricating the lie, monitoring whether the receiver believes the lie, and, if necessary, adjusting the fabricated story and maintaining a consistent lie. In the previous 15 years, increasing interest in the neuroscience of deception has resulted in new possibilities to investigate and interfere with the ability to lie directly from the brain. Cognitive psychology, as well as neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies, are increasing the possibility that neuroscience will be useful for lie detection. This paper discusses the scientific validity of the literature on neuroimaging and neurostimulation regarding lie detection to understand whether scientific findings in this field have a role in the forensic setting. We considered how lie detection technology may contribute to addressing the detection of deception in the courtroom and discussed the conditions and limits in which these techniques reliably distinguish whether an individual is lying.
References
Abe, N., Okuda, J., Suzuki, M., Sasaki, H., Matsuda, T., Mori, E., Tsukada, M., and Fujii, T. (2008). Neural correlates of true memory, false memory, and deception. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2811–2819.10.1093/cercor/bhn037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Abe, N., Fujii, T., Hirayama, K., Takeda, A., Hosokai, Y., Ishioka, T., Nishio, Y., Suzuki, K., Itoyama, Y., Takahashi, S., et al. (2009). Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour. Brain 132, 1386–1395.10.1093/brain/awp052Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Baron-Cohen, S. (1992). Out of sight or out of mind? Another look at deception in autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 33, 1141–1155.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00934.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
Bhatt, S., Mbwana, J., Adeyemo, A., Sawyer, A., Hailu, A., and Vanmeter, J. (2009). Lying about facial recognition: an fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 69, 382–390.10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.033Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Carper, R.A. and Courchesne, E. (2000). Inverse correlation between frontal lobe and cerebellum sizes in children with autism. Brain 123, 836–844.10.1093/brain/123.4.836Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Church, D.J. (2012). Neuroscience in the Courtroom: An International Concern, 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 1825, http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol53/iss5/8.Suche in Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? Am. Psychol. 46, 913–920.10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913Suche in Google Scholar
Farrow, T.F., Burgess, J., Wilkinson, I.D., and Hunter, M.D. (2015). Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management. Neuropsychologia 67, 159–174.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Fecteau, S., Boggio, P., Fregni, F., and Pascual-Leone, A. (2013). Modulation of untruthful responses with non-invasive brain stimulation. Front. Psychiatry 3, 97.10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00097Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Floel, A. (2014). tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage 85, 934–947.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.098Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S.M., Stose, S., Thompson, W.L., and Yurgelun-Todd, D.A. (2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 13, 830–836.10.1093/cercor/13.8.830Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Ganis, G., Rosenfeld, J.P., Meixner, J., Kievit, R.A., and Schendan, H.E. (2011). Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 55, 312–319.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Grubin, D. and Madsen, L. (2005). Lie detection and the polygraph: a historical review. Br. J. Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 16, 357–369.10.1080/14789940412331337353Suche in Google Scholar
Hadar, A.A., Makris, S., and Yarrow, K. (2012). The truth-telling motor cortex: response competition in M1 discloses deceptive behaviour. Biol. Psychol. 89, 495–502.10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.12.019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406, 147–150.10.1038/35018000Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Ishihara, L. and Brayne, C. (2006). What is the evidence for a premorbid parkinsonian personality: a systematic review. Mov. Disord. 21, 1066–1072.10.1002/mds.20980Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Ito, A., Abe, N., Fujii, T., Ueno, A., Koseki, Y., Hashimoto, R., Mugikura, S., Takahashi, S., and Mori, E. (2011). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception when remembering neutral and emotional events. Neurosci. Res. 69, 121–128.10.1016/j.neures.2010.11.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Ito, A., Abe, N., Fujii, T., Hayashi, A., Ueno, A., Mugikura, S., Takahashi, S., and Mori, E. (2012). The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling. Brain Res. 1464, 43–52.10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Jiang, W., Liu, H., Zeng, L., Liao, J., Shen, H., Luo, A., Hu, D., and Wang, W. (2015). Decoding the processing of lying using functional connectivity MRI. Behav. Brain. Funct. 11, 1.10.1186/s12993-014-0046-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Karim, A.A., Schneider, M., Lotze, M., Veit, R., Sauseng, P., Braun, C., and Birbaumer, N. (2010). The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cereb. Cortex 20, 205–213.10.1093/cercor/bhp090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Karton, I. and Bachmann, T. (2011). Effect of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on spontaneous truth-telling. Behav. Brain Res. 225, 209–214.10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.028Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Karton, I., Rinne, J.M., and Bachmann, T. (2014a). Facilitating the right but not left DLPFC by TMS decreases truthfulness of object-naming responses. Behav. Brain. Res. 271, 89–93.10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.059Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Karton, I., Palu, A., Joks, K., and Bachmann, T. (2014b). Deception rate in a “lying game”: different effects of excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of right and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex not found with inhibitory stimulation. Neurosci. Lett. 583, 21–25.10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Kireev, M.V., Medvedeva, N.S., Korotkov, A.D., and Medvedev, S.V. (2015). Functional interactions between caudate nuclei and inferior frontal gyrus in deliberate deception processing. Fiziol. Cheloveka. 41, 29–34.Suche in Google Scholar
Kozel, F.A., Revell, L.J., Lorberbaum, J.P., Shastri, A., Elhai, J.D., Horner, M.D., Smith, A., Nahas, Z., Bohning, D.E., and George, M.S. (2004a). A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 16, 295–305.10.1176/jnp.16.3.295Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Kozel, F.A., Padgett, T.M., and George, M.S. (2004b). A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 852–856.10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.852Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Kozel, F.A., Johnson, K.A., Grenesko, E.L., Laken, S.J., Kose, S., Lu, X., Pollina, D., Ryan, A., and George, M.S. (2009). Functional MRI detection of deception after committing a mock sabotage crime. J. Forensic Sci. 54, 220–231.10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00927.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Langleben, D.D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J.A., Gur, R.C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J.D., O’Brien, C.P., and Childress, A.R. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 15, 727–732.10.1006/nimg.2001.1003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Langleben, D.D., Loughead, J.W., Bilker, W.B., Ruparel, K., Childress, A.R., Busch, S.I., and Gur, R.C. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 26, 262–272.10.1002/hbm.20191Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Lee, T.M., Au, R.K., Liu, H.L., Ting, K.H., Huang, C.M., and Chan, C.C. (2009). Are errors differentiable from deceptive responses when feigning memory impairment? An fMRI study. Brain Cogn. 69, 406–412.10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Lee, T.M., Leung, M.K., Raine, A., and Chan, C.C. (2013). I want to lie about not knowing you, but my precuneus refuses to cooperate. Sci. Rep. 3, 1636.10.1038/srep01636Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Li, A.S., Kelley, E.A., Evans, A.D., and Lee, K. (2011). Exploring the ability to deceive in children with autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41, 185–195.10.1007/s10803-010-1045-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Lo, Y.L., Fook-Chong, S., and Tan, E.K. (2003). Increased cortical excitability in human deception. Neuroreport 14, 1021–1024.Suche in Google Scholar
Luber, B., Fisher, C., Appelbaum, P.S., Ploesser, M., and Lisanby, S.H. (2009). Non-invasive brain stimulation in the detection of deception: scientific challenges and ethical consequences. Behav. Sci. Law 27, 191–208.10.1002/bsl.860Suche in Google Scholar
Lykken, D.T. (1991). Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test. Integrative Psychol. Behav. Sci. 26, 214–222.10.1007/BF02912513Suche in Google Scholar
Mameli, F., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Vergari, M., Fumagalli, M., Macis, M., Ferrucci, R., Nordio, F., Consonni, D., Sartori, G., and Priori, A. (2010). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general – but not personal – knowledge deception: multiple brain networks for lying. Behav. Brain Res. 211, 164–168.10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024Suche in Google Scholar
Mameli, F., Tomasini, E., Scelzo, E., Fumagalli, M., Ferrucci, R., Bertolasi, L., and Priori, A. (2013). Lies tell the truth about cognitive dysfunction in essential tremor: an experimental deception study with the guilty knowledge task. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84, 1008–1013.10.1136/jnnp-2012-304674Suche in Google Scholar
Mameli, F., Sartori, G., Scarpazza, C., Zangrossi, A., Pietrini, P., Fumagalli, M., and Priori, A. (2016). Honesty. In: Neuroimaging Personality, Social Cognition, and Character, Elsevier Inc., Chapter 18, p. 305–322.10.1016/B978-0-12-800935-2.00016-6Suche in Google Scholar
Menza, M. (2000). The personality associated with Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2, 421–426.10.1007/s11920-000-0027-1Suche in Google Scholar
Mohamed, F.B., Faro, S.H., Gordon, N.J., Platek, S.M., Ahmad, H., and Williams, J.M. (2006). Brain mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation – initial experience. Radiology 238, 679–688.10.1148/radiol.2382050237Suche in Google Scholar
Nunez, J.M., Casey, B.J., Egner, T., Hare, T., and Hirsch, J. (2005). Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage 25, 267–277.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.041Suche in Google Scholar
Phan, K.L., Magalhaes, A., Ziemlewicz, T.J., Fitzgerald, D.A., Green, C., and Smith, W. (2005). Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Acad. Radiol. 12, 164–172.10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.023Suche in Google Scholar
Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 589–595.10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00437-6Suche in Google Scholar
Priori, A., Mameli, F., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Tiriticco, M., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Ferrucci, R., Zago, S., Polezzi, D., and Sartori, G. (2008). Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cereb. Cortex 18, 451–455.10.1093/cercor/bhm088Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Sodian, B. and Frith, U. (1992). Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded and normal children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 33, 591–605.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00893.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
Sowden, S., Wright, G.R., Banissy, M.J., Catmur, C., and Bird, G. (2015). Transcranial current stimulation of the temporoparietal junction improves lie detection. Curr. Biol. 25, 2447–2451.10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y., and Woodruff, P.W. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 12, 2849–2853.10.1097/00001756-200109170-00019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Spence, S.A., Hunter, M.D., Farrow, T.F., Green, R.D., Leung, D.H., Hughes, C.J., and Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1755–1762.10.1098/rstb.2004.1555Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Utz, K.S., Dimova, V., Oppenlander, K., and Kerkhoff, G. (2010). Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology – a review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia 48, 2789–2810.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Verschuere, B., Schuhmann, T., and Sack, A.T. (2012). Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 284.10.3389/fnhum.2012.00284Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., and Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 11, 89–121.10.1177/1529100610390861Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Yang, Y., Raine, A., Lencz, T., Bihrle, S., Lacasse, L., and Colletti, P. (2005). Prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. Br. J. Psychiatry 187, 320–325.10.1192/bjp.187.4.320Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Yang, Y., Raine, A., Narr, K.L., Lencz, T., LaCasse, L., Colletti, P., and Toga, A.W. (2007). Localisation of increased prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. Br. J. Psychiatry 190, 174–175.10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025056Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- New dimensions of connectomics and network plasticity in the central nervous system
- Redox-sensitive GFP to monitor oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases
- Effects of altered RTN3 expression on BACE1 activity and Alzheimer’s neuritic plaques
- Role of ABC transporters in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease
- The guilty brain: the utility of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies in forensic field
- Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics
- Epilepsy and vitamin D: a comprehensive review of current knowledge
- The thalamus as a relay station and gatekeeper: relevance to brain disorders
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- New dimensions of connectomics and network plasticity in the central nervous system
- Redox-sensitive GFP to monitor oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases
- Effects of altered RTN3 expression on BACE1 activity and Alzheimer’s neuritic plaques
- Role of ABC transporters in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease
- The guilty brain: the utility of neuroimaging and neurostimulation studies in forensic field
- Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics
- Epilepsy and vitamin D: a comprehensive review of current knowledge
- The thalamus as a relay station and gatekeeper: relevance to brain disorders