Startseite Evaluation of nuclear data analysis techniques for volume fraction prediction in the flow meter
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluation of nuclear data analysis techniques for volume fraction prediction in the flow meter

  • Seyedeh Zahra Islami rad EMAIL logo , Reza Gholipour Peyvandi und Hasan Gharaghani pour
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Oktober 2022

Abstract

The volume fraction percentage measurement in multiphase flows is a vital need in the oil, gas and petroleum industries. Thus, diverse and precise techniques should be presented for achieving this purpose. In this research, the water-oil two-phase flows were simulated using the MCNPX code in operational and real conditions in the oil district of Kharg. A single source 137Cs and a NaI (Tl) detector were used to provide the required data for volume fraction prediction. Then, the ANN, Gaussian, Linear Regression, and Fourier techniques were applied to the acquired nuclear data in order to compare and identify the suitable and precise method for predicting the volume fraction. Using the ANN, Gaussian, Linear Regression, and Fourier techniques, the volume fraction was predicted with a mean relative error percentage of less than 8.71, 10.14, 16.07, and 12.45%, respectively. Also, the root mean square error quantities were calculated 1.05, 1.18, 1.36, and 1.27, respectively. The results reveal that the ANN method has superior in comparison with the other methods.


Corresponding author: Seyedeh Zahra Islami rad, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Qom, Ghadir Blvd, Qom, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Tjugum, S. A., Hjertaker, B. T., Johansen, G. A. Multiphase flow regime identification by multibeam gamma-ray densitometry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 1319–1326; https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/13/8/321.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Chu, I. C., Song, C. H. Development and Performance Evaluation of 32-Channel Gamma Densitometer for the Measurement of Flow Pattern and Void Fraction in the Downcomer of MIDAS Test Facility; KAERI/TR-2045/2002, KAERI, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Chaudhuri, A., Osterhoudt, C. F., Sinha, D. N. An algorithm for determining volume fractions in two-phase liquid flows by measuring sound speed. J. Fluid Eng. 2012, 134, 101301; https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007265.Suche in Google Scholar

4. El Abd, A. Intercomparison of gamma ray scattering and transmission techniques for gas volume fraction measurements in two phase pipe flow. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 2014, 735, 260–266; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.09.047.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Gholipour Peyvandi, R., Islami rad, S. Z. Application of artificial neural networks for prediction of volume fraction using spectra of gamma rays backscattered by three-phase flows. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2017, 132, 511–519; https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11766-3.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Kalantari, A., Kamsin, A., Shamshirband, Sh., Chronopoulos, A. T. Computational intelligence approaches for medical data: state-of-the-art, future challenges and research directions. Neurocomputing 2018, 276, 2–22; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.126.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Pelowitz, D. B. MCNP-X TM User’s Manual, Version 2.5.0; LA-CP-05-0369, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

8. IAEA-TECDOC 1459. Technical data on nucleonic gauges; IAEA: Vienna, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Salgado, C. M., Brandao, L. E. B., Pereira, C. M. N. A., Salgado, W. L. Salinity independent volume fraction prediction in annular and stratified (water-gas-oil) multiphase flows using artificial neural networks. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2014, 76, 17–23; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Salgado, C. M., Brandao, L. E. B., Schirru, R., Pereira, C. M. N. A., Silva, A. X., Ramos, R. Prediction of volume fractions in three-phase flows using nuclear technique and artificial neural network. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2009, 67, 1812–1818; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.093.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Taylor, J. G. Neural Networks and Their Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Brighton, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Demuth, H., Beale, M., Hagan, M. Neural Network Toolbox TM 6, User’s Guide; The Math Works: Massachusetts, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Hadaji, E. g., Bourass, M., Ouammon, A., Bouachrine, M. 3D-QSAR models to predict anti-cancer activity on aseries os protein p38 MAP kinase inhabitors. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2017, 11, 392–407.10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.05.006Suche in Google Scholar

14. Schittkowski, K. Data Fitting in Dynamical Systems; Kluwer: Boston, 2002.10.1007/978-1-4419-5762-7Suche in Google Scholar

15. Gholipour Peyvandi, R., Islami rad, S. Z. Precise prediction of radiation interaction position in plastic rod scintillators using a fast and simple technique: artificial neural network. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2018, 50, 1154–1159; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.06.005.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Rencher, Alvin C., Christensen, William F. Chapter 10, Multivariate regression – Section 10.1, Introduction. In Methods of Multivariate Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Vol. 709, 2012; p. 19.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Hafiez, A. A. Fourier transformation methods in the field of gamma spectrometry. Pramana 2006, 67, 457–466; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-006-0006-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-21
Accepted: 2022-09-21
Published Online: 2022-10-10
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2022-0043/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen