Startseite Simultaneous Determination of Sufentanil and Ziconotide in Combination for Intrathecal Analgesia by UPLC-UV
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Simultaneous Determination of Sufentanil and Ziconotide in Combination for Intrathecal Analgesia by UPLC-UV

  • Jérémy Sorrieul

    Jérémy Sorrieul is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, since 2015. His domains of interest are analytical control of cytotoxic preparations and analgesic preparations, oncology pharmacy and clinical pharmacy.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , Vincent Gibory

    Vincent Gibory is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin since November 2016. He obtained his PharmD degree in 2016. His domains of interest are analytical, oncology pharmacy and clinical pharmacy.

    , Chau Phi Dinh

    Chau Phi Dinh is a Master 2 Student in Pharmacy. He will be graduated as Pharmacy Doctor in September 2017. He also interned at department of Pharmacy in Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin. His domains of interest are molecular modelling, medicinal chemistry and analytical chemistry.

    , Hélène Kieffer

    Hélène Kieffer is a hospital pharmacist working at the lnstitute of Cancer Research since 2013. Her special interests concern developpement of intrathecal analgesia preparation including the developpement of an integrated solution for prescription, preparation and control, reconstitution of cytotoxic drugs and automated dispensing cabinets.

    , Caroline Folliard

    Caroline Folliard is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin since 2009. She collaborates at pharmaceutical production activity (reconstitution of cytotoxic drugs, preparation of intrathecal analgesic admixture), including analytical control of pharmaceuticals compounding. Her domains of interest are oncology pharmacy, clinical pharmacy and medical devices

    , Denis Dupoiron

    Denis Dupoiron is a anesthesist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, head of the Anesthesia and Pain department His domain of interest are pain management and intrathecal analgesia.

    und Catherine Devys

    Catherine Devys is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, head of the pharmacy department since 2012. Specialized in cancer chemotherapy production including their analytical dosages, she also develops with the pharmacy and medical teams the production of analgesic mixture reconstitutions for intrathecal analgesia and their related dosage.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. Dezember 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Intrathecal analgesia has increased over the past two decades based on high level proof of efficacy in patients with cancer. Morphine and Ziconotide remains the reference. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference IT treatment algorithm recommends as the second line therapy opioids/ziconotide combination. Sufentanil and ziconotide combination can be used. The implantable pumps development helped to improve the comfort of the patient. The refills were prepared under a laminar airflow hood under strictly aseptic conditions, by the hospital pharmacist. In order to secure the process, a new analytical method by simple liquid chromatography ultraviolet spectrometry method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of two analgesic drugs (sufentanil, ziconotide). The method was validated according to the recommendation of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The method was linear between 0.1 to 4 μg/mL for ziconotide and 3.125 to 50 µg/mL for sufentanil. This routine quality control analysis secures the production process.

Introduction

Intrathecal analgesia has increased over the past two decades based on high level proof of efficacy in patients with cancer [1]. Morphine and Ziconotide are the only two agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [2]. Morphine remains the reference in case of strong to intense pain [3]. Ziconotide is a small ω-conotoxine peptide isolated from a marine cone snail Conus magus [4]. It acts as a selective blocker of voltage-sensitive calcium channels of N-type [36]. Previous published studies demonstrated that the presence of morphine sulfate accelerated ziconotide degradation [7, 8].

Development of tolerance and side effects has forced clinicians to explore alternative opioids such as fentanyl and sufentanil [9]. The use of other drugs is common among clinicians: bupivacaine, ropivacaïne, clonidine, fentanyl, sufentanil [10].

Ziconotide/opioids (fentanyl, sufentanil) combinations was recommended by the 2012 Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) IT treatment algorithm as the second and third line therapies in nociceptive pain and neuropathic pain respectively [10].

The dose used to start are for ziconotide from 0.25 to 0.50 µg/day [3] and for sufentanil 10 to 20 µg/day [10]. In clinical practice of our institution median concentration used for ziconotide is 0.58 µg/mL.

The administration of these analgesics drugs is done by using an intrathecal drug pump connected with a tunneled catheter implanted in the intrathecal area. This pump has a reservoir which must to be refill. This refill is prepared under strict aseptic conditions in a vertical laminar flow cabinet in a controlled atmosphere area. The two drugs are mixed together with a saline solution of 0.9 % as excipient (Fresenius Kabi, Sèvres, France) to achieve a final volume of 50 mL.

The preparation of the refill is performed using syringe 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 mL syringes Plastipak (BD, Le Pont de Claix, France). No studies on the physicochemical stability of this mixture in a syringe were previously published. However a study on the stability in pump was published and shows a stability of 33 days [11]. Refills are prepared extemporaneously.

The prospective assay of Dupoiron et al. show the benefits of an analytical control to secure preparations and limits dosage errors [3].

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new method of analytical control of sufentanil and ziconotide using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) combined with an ultraviolet detector.

Materials and methods

Analytes and reagents

Commercial pharmaceutical products were used for development and validation of the method Sufentanil citrate 250 mg/5 mL was bought by Mylan (Saint Priest, France). The excipients were sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid and water for injection.

Ziconotide (Prialt®, Eisai SAS, Paris La Défense, France) is marketed in 100 µg/1 mL vials, including the excipients methionine, sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide and water for injection.

Ultrapure water was obtained from Elga Purelab DV25 system. Acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid were supplied by VWR (Fontenay aux Roses, France).

Chromatographic and UV detection conditions

Analyses were conducted using an UPLC Acquity® H-Class® with UV detection (Waters, Guyancourt, France) managed by managed by the Empower software (V3) (Waters, Guyancourt, France). The column used was an Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 1.7 µm 2.1×50 mm. The mobile phase was a gradient of ultrapure water with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid and acetonitrile with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (Table 1). 10 µl were injected.

Table 1:

Gradient used for LC analysis.

Time (min)Flow rate (mL/min)% solvent A% solvent B
00.5955
0.50.59010
0.90.57525
2.00.57525
3.50.55545
4.80.50100
5.80.50100
6.10.5955
8.50.5955

Quantification was carried out at 200 nm for ziconotide and 220 nm for sufentanil. The retention times were of 1.69 min (Figure 1) and 3.85 min respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Chromatogram of Ziconotide.
Figure 1:

Chromatogram of Ziconotide.

Figure 2: Chromatogram of Sufentanil.
Figure 2:

Chromatogram of Sufentanil.

Standards and quality control QC preparations

Standards of Sufentanil were prepared by serial dilution of the pharmaceutical product with Nacl 0.9 % in glass vials. Standards of Ziconotide were prepared individually in polypropylene vials.

Quality controls (QC) containing a concentration of the two active substances in NaCl 0.9 % were prepared and analyzed during each validation run.

Validation procedure

A validation procedure was performed including selectivity, linearity, within-run and between-run precision and accuracy. Calibration standards of six levels and sets of QC samples (three concentrations) were prepared. The results were evaluated according acceptance criteria as described in the US FDA Guidance of Industry and Groupe d’Evaluation et de Recherche sur la Protection en Atmosphere Controlee (GERPAC) recommendations [12, 13].

Selectivity

Selectivity with regard to other components or excipients has been checked by analyzing individually three samples containing the other active substances in a mean concentration and the excipient (NaCl 0.9 %).

Calibration curve

The linearity of the method was evaluated by three standard curves performed on three different days and three different operators from 0.1 to 4 µg/mL for Ziconotide and 3.125 to 50 µg/mL for Sufentanil.

Standard curves in each analytical run were used to calculate the concentrations of three QC samples (QC).

According to the FDA recommendations weighting and adequacy of the regression model was determined by statistical analysis (Levene’s test and lack-of fit test) [12].

QC within-run and between-run accuracy and precision

Within-run accuracy and precision were determined without reagent or manipulator variability in a single run (n=6). Between-run precision and accuracy were determined on three runs (total: n=18) performed in different days and involving several manipulators.

Precision was expressed as the relative standard deviation RSD % for each level of concentration of each QC sample analyzed on three separate days.

Accuracy was evaluated by calculating the relative error (%RE) of each QC sample, using the calibration curve that was run on the same day.

According to the FDA recommendations limits of acceptable were fixed at ±15 % deviation.

Carryover

In order to evaluate carry over for each analyte, triplicate injections of blanks containing 0.9 % sodium chloride without analyte were injected after three high concentration samples (QC samples). This injection sequence was repeated 3 times.

Results

Selectivity

For the two analytes of interest, no interfering peaks were detected at the specific retention times. The absence of interference by the two other active substances of the mixture and NaCl 0.9 % has been validated for the two analytes.

Response function analysis

For Ziconotide, equality of variances was rejected. Calibration curves were linear over the studied concentration ranges with 1/x regression.

For Sufentanil, homogeneity of variances was accepted according to the Levene’s Test (calculated F=1.811<theoretical F=3.106, IC 95 %). The linear regression was carried out without weighting.

Standards calculated concentrations, between-run accuracy and precision are presented in Table 2. The regression coefficient (R2) for each calibration curve was > 0.996.

Table 2:

Calibrators between-run accuracy and precision.

Nominal concentrationsCalculated concentrationsBetween-run accuracy and precision
Run 1Run 2Run 3meanRE%RSD%
Sufentanil calibrators (µg/mL)
3.1253.3693.3283.3703.3567.40.7
6.256.266.266.306.270.40.4
12.5012.2312.3512.3212.30−1.60.5
2020.2920.0120.0820.130.60.7
2524.5824.8124.6324.67−1.30.5
5050.1550.1150.1850.150.30.1
R20.999890.999980.999980.999920.01
Slope30,64830,77630,86030,7620.35
Ziconotide calibrators (µg/mL)
0.100.090.110.110.116.911.0
0.200.190.190.210.19−3.45.7
0.400.440.380.360.39−1.610.5
1.001.091.010.971.022.16.1
2.001.921.851.801.85−7.33.2
4.003.984.164.254.133.33.4
R20.999320.998840.999670.998600.04
Slope42,07141,36144,85242,7624.31

QC within-run and between run accuracy and precision

For Ziconotide within-run precision ranged between –10.6 % and 2.2 % and 0.2 % and 11.3 % for Sufentanil. Within-run and between accuracy and precision were presented in Table 3.

Table 3:

Within-run and between-run accuracy and precision obtained for QC samples.

Calculated concentrationsBetween-run accuracy and precision
Run 1Run 2Run 3meanRE%RSD%
Sufentanil
QCL (5 µg/mL)5.65.45.35.59.11.9
5.65.45.4
5.55.55.4
Within-run mean5.65.45.4
Within-run RE% mean11.38.77.3
Within-run RSD%1.01.11.1
QCM (15 µg/mL)15.315.315.015.21.60.5
15.315.315.0
15.315.215.5
Within-run mean15.315.315.2
Within-run RE% mean2.01.81.1
Within-run RSD%0.00.41.9
QCH (45 µg/mL)45.244.845.2
45.345.245.3
44.845.345.4
Within-run mean45.145.145.3
Within-run RE% mean0.70.20.745.21.61.0
Within-run RSD%0.60.60.2
Ziconotide
QCL (0.25 µg/mL)0.2340.2410.2330.234−6.55.2
0.2470.2220.233
0.2530.220.214
Within-run mean0.2450.2300.227
Within-run RE% mean−2.1−8.1−9.3
Within-run RSD%4.04.34.8
QCM (1.50 µg/mL)1.431.451.641.43−4.87.0
1.421.321.48
1.461.351.31
Within-run mean1.431.381.47
Within-run RE% mean−4.4−8.2−1.8
Within-run RSD%1.45.111.2
QCH (3.8 µg/mL)3.843.483.54
3.853.623.31
3.963.553.33
Within-run mean3.883.553.40
Within-run RE% mean2.2−6.55−10.63.61−5.06.4
Within-run RSD%1.62.03.7

Carryover

No intersample contamination occurred for ziconotide and sufentanil was detected in the blank series

Discussion

The low concentrations of ziconotide associated with precision syringes are factors increasing the variability of results for ziconotide accuracy and precision.

After validation, this method has been used routinely. The acceptance criteria were ±10 % for each drug. When the error rate is above 10 % the preparation was homogenized again and analyzed. If the second result was above 10 %, the preparation was rejected. In two months, 250 preparations have been analyzed. Any preparation was rejected.

Conclusion

In order to secure the preparation, a new method based on UPLC-UV to quantify admixture with sufentanil and ziconotide was developed and fully validated according to FDA recommendations. The calibration range was from 0.1 to 4 μg/mL for ziconotide and 3.125 to 50 µg/mL for sufentanil. This method offers an interesting compromise in terms of detection level and analysis time compared with methods previously published. This routine quality control analysis secures the production process.

About the authors

Jérémy Sorrieul

Jérémy Sorrieul is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, since 2015. His domains of interest are analytical control of cytotoxic preparations and analgesic preparations, oncology pharmacy and clinical pharmacy.

Vincent Gibory

Vincent Gibory is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin since November 2016. He obtained his PharmD degree in 2016. His domains of interest are analytical, oncology pharmacy and clinical pharmacy.

Chau Phi Dinh

Chau Phi Dinh is a Master 2 Student in Pharmacy. He will be graduated as Pharmacy Doctor in September 2017. He also interned at department of Pharmacy in Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin. His domains of interest are molecular modelling, medicinal chemistry and analytical chemistry.

Hélène Kieffer

Hélène Kieffer is a hospital pharmacist working at the lnstitute of Cancer Research since 2013. Her special interests concern developpement of intrathecal analgesia preparation including the developpement of an integrated solution for prescription, preparation and control, reconstitution of cytotoxic drugs and automated dispensing cabinets.

Caroline Folliard

Caroline Folliard is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin since 2009. She collaborates at pharmaceutical production activity (reconstitution of cytotoxic drugs, preparation of intrathecal analgesic admixture), including analytical control of pharmaceuticals compounding. Her domains of interest are oncology pharmacy, clinical pharmacy and medical devices

Denis Dupoiron

Denis Dupoiron is a anesthesist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, head of the Anesthesia and Pain department His domain of interest are pain management and intrathecal analgesia.

Catherine Devys

Catherine Devys is a hospital pharmacist in the Institute of Cancer Research Paul Papin, head of the pharmacy department since 2012. Specialized in cancer chemotherapy production including their analytical dosages, she also develops with the pharmacy and medical teams the production of analgesic mixture reconstitutions for intrathecal analgesia and their related dosage.

  1. Conflict of interest statement: Authors state no conflict of interest. All authors have read the journal’s Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement available at the journal’s website and hereby confirm that they comply with all its parts applicable to the present scientific work.

References

1. Dupoiron D, Richard H, Chabert-Desnot V, Devys C, Leynia P, Boisdron-Celle M. In Vitro stability of low-concentration ziconotide alone or in admixtures in intrathecal pumps: stability of low-concentration ziconotide in pumps. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 2014;17(5):472–82.10.1111/ner.12142Suche in Google Scholar

2. Rossignol E, Sorrieul J, Beaussart H, Kieffer H, Folliard C, Dupoiron D, et al. Validation study of UPLC method for determination of morphine, ropivacaïne and ziconotide in combination for intrathecal analgesia. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2016;7(3). 10.4172/2155-9872.1000310Suche in Google Scholar

3. Dupoiron D, Devys C, Bazin C, Folliard C, Lebrec N, Bore F, et al. Rationale for prospective assays of intrathecal mixtures including morphine, ropivacaine and ziconotide: prevention of adverse events and feasibility in clinical practice. Pain Physician 2015;18(4):349–57.10.36076/ppj.2015/18/349Suche in Google Scholar

4. Mathur V. ziconotide: a new pharmacological class of drug for the management of pain. Semin Anesth Perioper Med Pain 2000;19(2):67–75.10.1053/sa.2000.6787Suche in Google Scholar

5. Schmidtko A, Lötsch J, Freynhagen R, Geisslinger G. Ziconotide for treatment of severe chronic pain. The Lancet 2010;375(9725):1569–77.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60354-6Suche in Google Scholar

6. Vink S, Alewood P. Targeting voltage-gated calcium channels: developments in peptide and small-molecule inhibitors for the treatment of neuropathic pain: VGCC ligands and pain. Br J Pharmacol 2012;167(5):970–89.10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02082.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Shields D, Montenegro R, Ragusa M. Chemical stability of admixtures combining ziconotide with morphine or hydromorphone during simulated intrathecal administration. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 2005;8(4):257–63.10.1111/j.1525-1403.2005.00034.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Shields DE, Liu W, Gunning K, Montenegro R. Statistical evaluation of the chemical stability of ziconotide solutions during simulated intrathecal administration. J Pain Symptom Manage 2008;36(1):e4–6.10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.01.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Waara-Wolleat KL, Hildebrand KR, Stewart GR. A review of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for the treatment of chronic pain. Pain Med 2006;7(3):251–9.10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00155.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Rathmell J, Buchser E, Burton A, et al. Polyanalgesic consensus conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel: intrathecal therapy consensus. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 2012;15(5):436–66.10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00476.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Shields DE, Aclan J, Szatkowski A. Chemical stability of admixtures combining ziconotide with fentanyl or sufentanil during simulated intrathecal administration. Int J Pharm Compd 2008;12(5):463–6.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Guidance for Industry-Bianalytical Method Validation FDA. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm368107.pdf (date last accessed 5 June 2016).Suche in Google Scholar

13. Sautou V. Société française de pharmacie clinique, Groupe d’évaluation et de recherche sur la protection en atmosphère contrôlée. Guide méthodologique des études de stabilité des préparations. Partie 1. [Clermont-Ferrand]; [Pau]: SFCP ; GERPAC, 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-22
Revised: 2016-11-10
Accepted: 2016-11-11
Published Online: 2016-12-3
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pthp-2016-0020/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen