Chemical sensors based on surface charge transfer

References

[1] Wencel D, Abel T, McDonagh C. Optical chemical pH sensors. Anal Chem. 2014;86:15–29.10.1021/ac4035168Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Rahman MA, Kumar P, Park DS, Shim YB. Electrochemical sensors based on organic conjugated polymer. Sens. 2008;8:118–41.10.3390/s8010118Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Compton RG, Banks CE. Understanding voltammetry. Singapore: World Scientific; 2007.10.1142/6430Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Seymour EH, Lawrence NS, Compton RG. Reaction with N,N-Diethyl-P-Phenylenediamine: A procedure for the sensitive square-wave voltammetric detection of chlorine. Electroanal. 2003;15:689–94.10.1002/elan.200390086Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Janata J, Josowicz M. Conducting polymers in electronic chemical sensors. Nat Mater. 2003;2:19–24.10.1038/nmat768Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Janata J. Thirty years of CHEMFETs - A personal view. Electroanal. 2004;16:1831–35.10.1002/elan.200403070Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Ng AL, Chen C, Kwon H, Peng Z, Lee CS, Wang Y. Chemical gating of a synthetic tube-in-a-tube semiconductor. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:3045–51.10.1021/jacs.6b12111Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Palin AT. The determination of free and combined chlorine in water by the use of Diethyl-P-Phenylene diamine. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1957;49:873–80.10.1002/j.1551-8833.1957.tb16870.xSuche in Google Scholar

[9] Moberg L, Karlberg B. An Improved N,N’-Diethyl-P-Phenylenediamine (DPD) method for the determination of free chlorine based on multiple wavelength detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2000;407:127–33.10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00780-1Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Tang Y, Su Y, Yang N, Zhang L, Lv Y. Carbon nitride quantum dots: A novel chemiluminescence system for selective detection of free chlorine in water. Anal Chem. 2014;86:4528–35.10.1021/ac5005162Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Jensen JN, Johnson JD. Specificity of the DPD and amperometric titration methods for free available chlorine: A review. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1989;81:59–64.10.1002/j.1551-8833.1989.tb06894.xSuche in Google Scholar

[12] Rahimi R, Ochoa M, Tamayol A, Khalili S, Khademhosseini A, Ziaie B. A highly stretchable potentiometric pH sensor fabricated via direct laser-writing/machining of carbon-polyaniline composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:9015–23.10.1021/acsami.6b16228Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Zhao D, Guo X, Wang T, Alvarez NT, Shanov VN, Heineman WR. Simultaneous detection of heavy metals by anodic stripping voltammetry using carbon nanotube thread. Electroanal. 2014;26:488–96.10.1002/elan.201300511Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Jiang G, Goledzinowski M, Comeau FJE, Zarrin H, Lui G, Lenos J, et al. Free-standing functionalized graphene oxide solid electrolytes in electrochemical gas sensors. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:1729–36.10.1002/adfm.201504604Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Janata J, Josowicz M. Chemical modulation of work function as a transduction mechanism for chemical sensors. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:241–48.10.1021/ar9700668Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Seiyama T, Fujiishi K, Nagatani M, Kato A. A new detector for gaseous components using zinc oxide thin films. J Soc Chem Ind Japan. 1963;66:652–55.10.1246/nikkashi1898.66.5_652Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Albert KJ, Lewis NS, Schauer CL, Sotzing AG, Stitzel SE, Vaid TP, et al. Cross-reactive chemical sensor arrays. Chem Rev. 2000;100:2595–626.10.1021/cr980102wSuche in Google Scholar

[18] Göpel W, Schierbaum KD. SnO₂ sensors: current status and future prospects. Sens Actuat B Chem. 1995;26:1–12.10.1016/0925-4005(94)01546-TSuche in Google Scholar

[19] Lange U, Roznyatovskaya NV, Mirsky VM. Conducting polymers in chemical sensors and arrays. Anal Chim Acta. 2008;614:1–26.10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.068Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Balouria V, Samanta S, Singh A, Debnath AK, Mahajan A, Bedi RK, et al. Chemiresistive gas sensing properties of nanocrystalline Co₃O₄ thin films. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;176:38–45.10.1016/j.snb.2012.08.064Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Korotcenkov G, Brinzari V, Stetter JR, Blinov I, Blaja V. The nature of processes controlling the kinetics of indium oxide-based thin film gas sensor response. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2007;128:51–63.10.1016/j.snb.2007.05.028Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Song E, Choi JW. Conducting polyaniline nanowire and its applications in chemiresistive sensing. Nanomater. 2013;3:498–523.10.3390/nano3030498Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Joshi N, Saxena V, Singh A, Koiry SP, Debnath AK, Chehimi MM, et al. Flexible H₂S sensor based on gold modified polycarbazole films. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2014;200:227–34.10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.041Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Yang L, Li M, Qu Y, Dong Z, Li WJ. Carbon nanotube-sensor-integrated microfluidic platform for real-time chemical concentration detection. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:3198–205.10.1002/elps.200900126Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Robinson JT, Perkins FK, Snow ES, Wei Z, Sheehan PE. Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. Nano Lett. 2008;8:3137–40.10.1021/nl8013007Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Yamazoe N, Miura N. Environmental gas sensing. Sens Actuat B Chem. 1994;20:95–102.10.1016/0925-4005(93)01183-5Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Sun GJ, Lee JK, Choi S, Lee WI, Kim HW, Lee C. Selective oxidizing gas sensing and dominant sensing mechanism of n-CaO-Decorated n-ZnO nanorod sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:9975–85.10.1021/acsami.6b15995Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Adhyapak PV, Mulik UP, Amalnerkar DP, Mulla IS. Low temperature synthesis of needle-like alpha-FeOOH and their conversion into alpha-Fe₂O₃ nanorods for humidity sensing application. J Am Ceram Soc. 2013;96:731–35.10.1111/jace.12189Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Zappa D, Bertuna A, Comini E, Kaur N, Poli N, Sberveglieri V, et al. Metal oxide nanostructures: preparation, characterization and functional applications as chemical sensors. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2017;8:1205–17.10.3762/bjnano.8.122Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Lin HJ, Gao H, Gao PX. UV-enhanced CO sensing using Ga₂O₃-based nanorod arrays at elevated temperature. Appl Phys Lett. 2017;110:043101.10.1063/1.4974213Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Song Z, Wei Z, Wang B, Luo Z, Xu S, Zhang W, et al. Sensitive room-temperature H₂S gas sensors employing SnO₂ quantum wire/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Chem Mater. 2016;28:1205–12.10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04850Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Kim DH, Shim YS, Jeon JM, Jeong HY, Park SS, Kim YW, et al. Vertically ordered hematite nanotube array as an ultrasensitive and rapid response acetone sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:14779–84.10.1021/am504156wSuche in Google Scholar

[33] Jaisutti R, Lee M, Kim J, Choi S, Ha TJ, Kim J, et al. Ultrasensitive room-temperature operable gas sensors using p-type Na: ZnO Nanoflowers for diabetes detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:8796–804.10.1021/acsami.7b00673Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Cho B, Hahm MG, Choi M, Yoon J, Kim AR, Lee YJ, et al. Charge-transfer-based gas sensing using atomic-layer MoS₂. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8052.10.1038/srep08052Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Hazra A, Dutta K, Bhowmik B, Chattopadhyay PP, Bhattacharyya P. Room temperature alcohol sensing by oxygen vacancy controlled TiO₂ nanotube array. Appl Phys Lett. 2014;105:081604.10.1063/1.4894008Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Xu C, Tamaki J, Miura N, Yamazoe N. Grain size effects on gas sensitivity of porous SnO2-based elements. Sens Actuat B Chem. 1991;3:147–55.10.1016/0925-4005(91)80207-ZSuche in Google Scholar

[37] Singh S, Greiner MT, Kruse P. Robust inorganic membranes from detachable ultra-thin tantalum oxide films. Nano Lett. 2007;7:2676–83.10.1021/nl071061zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Singh S, Festin M, Barden WRT, Xi L, Francis JT, Kruse P. Universal method for the fabrication of detachable ultrathin films of several transition metal oxides. ACS Nano. 2008;2:2363–73.10.1021/nn800488hSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Imbault A, Wang Y, Kruse P, Strelcov E, Comini E, Sberveglieri G, et al. Ultrathin gas permeable oxide membranes for chemical sensing: nanoporous Ta₂O₅ test study. Materials. 2015;8:6677–84.10.3390/ma8105333Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Roy S, Raju R, Chuang HF, Cruden BA, Meyyappan M. Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores. J Appl Phys. 2003;93:4870–79.10.1063/1.1559936Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Lange U, Mirsky VM. Chemiresistors based on conducting polymers: A review on measurement techniques. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;687:105–13.10.1016/j.aca.2010.11.030Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Fowler JD, Virji S, Kaner RB, Weiller BH. Hydrogen detection by polyaniline nanofibers on gold and platinum electrodes. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:6444–49.10.1021/jp810500qSuche in Google Scholar

[43] Liu C, Noda Z, Sasaki K, Hayashi K. Development of a polyaniline nanofiber-based carbon monoxide sensor for hydrogen fuel cell application. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2012;37:13529–35.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.096Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Zeng FW, Liu XX, Diamond D, Lau KT. Humidity sensors based on polyaniline nanofibres. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2010;143:530–34.10.1016/j.snb.2009.09.050Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Song E, Choi JW. Self-calibration of a polyaniline nanowire-based chemiresistive pH sensor. Microelectr Eng. 2014;116:26–32.10.1016/j.mee.2013.10.014Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Charlesworth JM, Partridge AC, Garrard N. Mechanistic Studies on the interactions between poly(pyrrole) and organic vapors. J Phys Chem. 1993;97:5418–23.10.1021/j100122a038Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Wang F, Yang Y, Swager TM. Molecular recognition for high selectivity in carbon nanotube/polythiophene chemiresistors. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:8394–96.10.1002/anie.200802762Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Gruber J, Yoshikawa EKC, Bao Y, Geise HJ. Synthesis of a novel poly(p-Phenylene-Vinylene) derivative and its application in chemiresistive sensors for electronic noses with an unusual response to organic vapours. e-Polym. 2004;4:014.10.1515/epoly.2004.4.1.128Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Tanese MC, Torsi L, Cioffi N, Zotti LA, Colangiuli D, Farinola GM, et al. Poly(phenyleneethynylene) polymers bearing glucose substituents as promising active layers in enantioselective chemiresistors. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2004;100:17–21.10.1016/j.snb.2003.12.066Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Huang J, Virji S, Weiller BH, Kaner RB. Polyaniline nanofibers: facile synthesis and chemical sensors. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:314–15.10.1021/ja028371ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Xue M, Li F, Chen D, Yang Z, Wang X, Ji J. High-oriented polypyrrole nanotubes for next-generation gas sensor. Adv Mater. 2016;28:8265–70.10.1002/adma.201602302Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Virji S, Huang JX, Kaner RB, Weiller BH. Polyaniline nanofiber gas sensors: examination of response mechanisms. Nano Lett. 2004;227:104–104.10.1021/nl035122eSuche in Google Scholar

[53] Virji S, Kaner RB, Weiller BH. Hydrogen sensors based on conductivity changes in polyaniline nanofibers. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:22266–70.10.1021/jp063166gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Meyyappan M. Carbon nanotube-based chemical sensors. Small. 2016;12:2118–29.10.1002/smll.201502555Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[55] Llobet E. Gas sensors using carbon nanomaterials: A review. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;179:32–45.10.1016/j.snb.2012.11.014Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Schedin F, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Hill EW, Blake P, Katsnelson MI, et al. Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater. 2007;6:652–55.10.1038/nmat1967Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Varghese SS, Varghese SH, Swaminathan S, Singh KK, Mittal V. Two-dimensional materials for sensing: graphene and beyond. Electronics. 2015;4:651–87.10.3390/electronics4030651Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Kurra N, Kulkarni GU. Pencil-on-paper: electronic devices. Lab Chip. 2013;13:2866–73.10.1039/c3lc50406aSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[59] Wakeland S, Martinez R, Grey JK, Luhrs CC. Production of graphene from graphite oxide using urea as expansion-reduction agent. Carbon. 2010;48:3463–70.10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.043Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Bianco GV, Losurdo M, Giangregorio MM, Capezzuto P, Bruno G. Exploring and rationalizing effective N-doping of large area CVD-graphene by NH₃. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:3632–39.10.1039/c3cp54451fSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Qin Y, Kwon HJ, Subrahmanyam A, Howlader MMR, Selvaganapathy PR, Adronov A, et al. Inkjet-printed bifunctional carbon nanotubes for pH sensing. Mater Lett. 2016;176:68–70.10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.048Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Hsu LHH, Hoque E, Kruse P, Selvaganapathy PR, A Carbon nanotube based resettable sensor for measuring free chlorine in drinking water. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;106:63102.10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985182Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Hong S, Myung S. Nanotube electronics: A flexible approach to mobility. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:207–08.10.1038/nnano.2007.89Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Singh S, Kruse P. Carbon nanotube surface science. Int J Nanotechnol. 2008;5:900–29.10.1504/IJNT.2008.019826Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Moonoosawmy KR, Kruse P. Cause and consequence of carbon nanotube doping in water and aqueous media. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1572–77.10.1021/ja906820nSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[66] Moonoosawmy KR, Kruse P. To dope or not to dope: the effect of sonicating single-wall carbon nanotubes in common laboratory solvents on their electronic structure. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;130:13417–24.10.1021/ja8036788Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Klinke C, Chen J, Afzali A, Avouris P. Charge transfer induced polarity switching in carbon nanotube transistors. Nano Lett. 2005;5:555–58.10.1021/nl048055cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] Li J, Lu Y, Ye QL, Han J, Meyyappan M. Carbon nanotube based chemical sensors for gas and vapor detection. Nano Lett. 2003;3:929–33.10.1021/nl034220xSuche in Google Scholar

[69] Arnold MS, Green AA, Hulvat JF, Stupp SI, Hersam MC. Sorting carbon nanotubes by electronic structure using density differentiation. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006;1:60.10.1038/nnano.2006.52Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Cao Q, Han S, Tersoff J, Franklin AD, Zhu Y, Zhang Z. End-bonded contacts for carbon nanotube transistors with low, size-independent resistance. Science. 2015;350:68–71.10.1126/science.aac8006Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater. 2007;6:183–91.10.1142/9789814287005_0002Suche in Google Scholar

[72] McCurle JW. Diamagnetism of graphite. Phys Rev. 1956;104:666–71.10.1103/PhysRev.104.666Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Slonczewski JC, Weiss PR. Band structure of graphite. Phys Rev. 1958;330:272–79.10.1103/PhysRev.109.272Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Wallace PR. The band theory of graphite. Phys Rev. 1947;71:622–34.10.1103/PhysRev.71.622Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Mermin ND. Crystalline order in two dimensions. Phys Rev. 1968;176:250–54.10.1103/PhysRev.176.250Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306:666–69.10.1126/science.1102896Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Levendorf MP, Ruiz-Vargas CS, Garg S, Park J. Transfer-free batch fabrication of single layer graphene transistors. Nano Lett. 2009;9:4479–83.10.1021/nl902790rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[78] Geim AK. Graphene: status and prospects. Science. 2009;324:1530–34.10.1126/science.1158877Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[79] Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB. Honeycomb carbon: A review of graphene. Chem Rev. 2010;110:132–45.10.1021/cr900070dSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Denis PA, Iribarne F. Comparative Study of defect reactivity in graphene. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:19048–55.10.1021/jp4061945Suche in Google Scholar

[81] Guo B, Fang L, Zhang B, Gong JR. Graphene doping: A review. Insciences J. 2011;1:80–89.10.5640/insc.010280Suche in Google Scholar

[82] Partoens B, Peeters F. From graphene to graphite: electronic structure around the K point. Phys Rev B. 2006;74:75404.10.1103/PhysRevB.74.075404Suche in Google Scholar

[83] Liu J, Liu Z, Barrow CJ, Yang W. Molecularly engineered graphene surfaces for sensing applications: A review. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;859:1–19.10.1016/j.aca.2014.07.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[84] Rutter GM, Crain JN, Guisinger NP, Li T, First PN, Stroscio JA. Scattering and interference in epitaxial graphene. Science. 2007;317:219–22.10.1126/science.1142882Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[85] Varghese SS, Lonkar S, Singh KK, Swaminathan S, Abdala A. Recent advances in graphene based gas sensors. Sens Actuat B Chem. 2015;218:160–83.10.1016/j.snb.2015.04.062Suche in Google Scholar

[86] Ang PK, Chen W, Thye A, Wee S, Loh KP. Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14392–93.10.1021/ja805090zSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Shirsat MD, Sarkar T, Kakoullis J, Jr., Myung NV, Konnanath B, Spanias A, et al. Porphyrine-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube chemiresistive sensor arrays for VOCs. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:3845–50.10.1021/jp210582tSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[88] Liu SF, Moh LCH, Swager TM. Single-walled carbon nanotube−metalloporphyrin chemiresistive gas sensor arrays for volatile organic compounds. Chem Mater. 2015;27:3560–63.10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00153Suche in Google Scholar

[89] Rushi A, Datta K, Ghosh P, Mulchandani A. Selective discrimination among benzene, toluene, and xylene: probing metalloporphyrin-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube-based field effect transistors. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:24034–41.10.1021/jp504657cSuche in Google Scholar

[90] Zhao J, Hashmi A, Xu J, Xue W. A compact lab-on-a-chip nanosensor for glycerol detection. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;100:243109.10.1063/1.4729424Suche in Google Scholar

[91] Gautam M, Jayatissa AH. Ammonia gas sensing behavior of graphene surface decorated with gold nanoparticles. Solid State Electron. 2012;78:159–65.10.1016/j.sse.2012.05.059Suche in Google Scholar

[92] Yavari F, Castillo E, Gullapalli H, Ajayan PM, Koratkar N. High sensitivity detection of NO₂ and NH₃ in air using chemical vapor deposition grown graphene. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;100:203120.10.1063/1.4720074Suche in Google Scholar

[93] Meng H, Yang W, Ding K, Feng L, Guan Y. Cu₂O nanorods modified by reduced graphene oxide for NH₃ sensing at room temperature. J Mater Chem A. 2015;3:1174–81.10.1039/C4TA06024ESuche in Google Scholar

[94] Ye Z, Jiang Y, Tai H, Yuan Z. The investigation of reduced graphene oxide/P3HT composite films for ammonia detection. Integr Ferroelectr. 2014;154:73–81.10.1080/10584587.2014.904148Suche in Google Scholar

[95] Dua V, Surwade SP, Ammu S, Agnihotra SR, Jain S, Roberts KE, et al. All-organic vapor sensor using inkjet-printed reduced graphene oxide. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:2154–57.10.1002/anie.200905089Suche in Google Scholar

[96] Qin Y, Kwon HJ, Howlader MMR, Deen MJ. Microfabricated electrochemical pH and free chlorine sensors for water quality monitoring: recent advances and research challenges. RSC Adv. 2015;5:69086–109.10.1039/C5RA11291ESuche in Google Scholar

[97] Zhang T, Petelenz D, Janata J. Temperature-controlled kelvin microprobe. Sens Actuat B Chem. 1993;12:175–80.10.1016/0925-4005(93)80016-5Suche in Google Scholar

[98] Li J, Petelenz D, Janata J. Suspended gate field-effect transistor sensitive to gaseous hydrogen cyanide. Electroanal. 1993;5:791–94.10.1002/elan.1140050912Suche in Google Scholar

[99] Torsi L, Magliulo M, Manoli K, Palazzo G. Organic field-effect transistor sensors: A tutorial review. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:8612–28.10.1039/c3cs60127gSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Zhang C, Chen P, Hu W. Organic field-effect transistor-based gas sensors. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:2087–207.10.1039/C4CS00326HSuche in Google Scholar

[101] Mohtasebi A, Broomfield AD, Chowdhury T, Selvaganapathy PR, Kruse P. Reagent-free quantification of aqueous free chlorine via electrical readout of colorimetrically functionalized pencil lines. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:20748–61.10.1021/acsami.7b03968Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[102] Hoque E, Hsu LHH, Aryasomayajula A, Selvaganapathy PR, Kruse P. Pencil-drawn chemiresistive sensor for free chlorine in water. IEEE Sens Lett. 2017;1:4500504.10.1109/LSENS.2017.2722958Suche in Google Scholar

[103] Kim KK, Kim SM, Lee YH. Chemically conjugated carbon nanotubes and graphene for carrier modulation. Acc Chem Res. 2016;49:390–99.10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00441Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[104] Mohtasebi A, Chowdhury T, Hsu LHH, Biesinger MC, Kruse P. Interfacial charge transfer between phenyl- capped aniline tetramer films and iron oxide surfaces. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:29248–63.10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09950Suche in Google Scholar

[105] Xue M, Wang S, Wu K, Guo J, Guo Q. Surface structural evolution in iron oxide thin films. Langmuir. 2011;27:11–14.10.1021/la103732rSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[106] Dresselhaus MS, Jorio A, Saito R. Characterizing graphene, graphite, and carbon nanotubes by raman spectroscopy. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2010;1:89–108.10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-103919Suche in Google Scholar

[107] Snow AW, Perkins FK, Ancona MG, Robinson JT, Snow ES, Foos EE. Disordered nanomaterials for chemielectric vapor sensing: A review. IEEE Sens J. 2015;15:1301–20.10.1109/JSEN.2014.2364677Suche in Google Scholar