A refutation of “a refutation of universal grammar”(Lin, f. 2017. Lingua 193. 1–22.)

References

Andersen, H. & B. Hepburn. 2016. Scientific method. In E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition).Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. & D. Lightfoot. 2000. The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology 62. 697–722.10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.697Suche in Google Scholar

Anjomshoa, L. & S. Firooz. 2015. Minimalism, Economy, Simplicity, and Children Language Acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 192, 142-9.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.021Suche in Google Scholar

Anogianakis, G. 2017. Book review. Reinterpreting Darwin to explain evolution of language: a review of Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, R.C. Berwick, N. Chomsky, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016, 215 pp., Price: $22.95, Hardcover, ISBN: 978-0-262-03424-1. Lingua 191-192:94-99.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

Antovic, M. 2007. Half a century of generative linguistics -- what has the paradigm given to social science? Facta universitatis 5:31-46.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 2008a. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, M. 2008b. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (ed.) The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 351-74.Suche in Google Scholar

Berk, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. 2012. The Two-Word Stage: Motivated by Linguistic or Cognitive Constraints? Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 118–140.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, A., & Casadio, C. 1983. Anaphoric relations, pronouns and Latin complementation. In Latin linguistics and linguistic theory, ed. H. Pinkster, 27-40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.12.07berSuche in Google Scholar

Berwick, R. & Chomsky, N. 2017. Why only us: recent questions and answers. Journal of neurolinguistics 43, 166-77.10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

Berwick, R., & Chomsky, N. 2015. Why only us. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Berwick, R., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., & Chomsky, N. 2011. Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science 35(7), 1207-1242.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.xSuche in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2011. Approaching parameters from below. In A. Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds.). The biolinguistic enterprise: new perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, 205-221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C., & Grohmann, K. 2007. Remark: Putting Phases in Perspective. Syntax 10:204-222.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00098.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2002. On Multiple Wh-Fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 351-83.10.1162/002438902760168536Suche in Google Scholar

Boxell, O. 2016. The Place of Universal Grammar in the Study of Language and Mind: A Response to Dabrowska (2015). Open Linguisticsa 2, 352-72.10.1515/opli-2016-0017Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky N. 1976. Problems and Mysteries in the Study of Human Language. In: Kasher A. (eds) Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_15Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1966. The current scene in linguistics: present directions. College English 27:587-595.10.2307/374695Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1967. The formal nature of language. In Biological foundations of langage, ed. E. Lenneberg, 397-442. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1972. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldSuche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981a. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884166Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981b. Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In Explanation in linguistics: the logical problem of language acquisition, eds. Norbert Hornstein and D. Lightfoot, 32-75. London, New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981c. On cognitive capacity. In Readings in philosophy of psychology. Volume 2. , ed. N. Block, 305-323. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1981d. Knowledge of language: its elements and origins. In J. Askedal, I. Roberts and T. Matsushita (eds.). Noam Chomsky and language descriptions, 55-71. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/daslu.2.05choSuche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1987. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1990. Language and mind. In D. Mellor (ed.). Ways of communicating, 56-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1991. Linguistics and adjacent fields, a personal view. In A. Kasher (ed.). The Chomskyan turn, 3-25. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1997. Language from an internalist perspective. In D. Johnson & C. Erneling (eds.). The future of the cognitive revolution, 118-135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1998. Some observations on economy in Generative Grammar. In Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M. & Pesetsky, D. (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. 115-127. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. .Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000a. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000b. Linguistics and brain science. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita & W. O'Neil (eds.). Image, language and brain. Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project Symposium, 13-28. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000c. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613876Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2003. Replies. In L. Antony & N. Hornstein (eds.). Chomsky and his critics, 255-328. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470690024.ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2004a. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2004b. Language and mind: current thoughts on ancient problem. In L. Jenkins (ed.). Variation and universals in biolinguistics, 379-406. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080474748_018Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36:1-22.10.1162/0024389052993655Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2006. 3rd ed. Language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2007a. Of minds and language. Biolinguistics 1:1-27.10.1037/e400082009-004Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2007b. Biolinguistic explorations: design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15:1-21.10.1080/09672550601143078Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2007c. Approaching UG from Below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (eds.). Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, 1-29. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552-001Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. Zubizarreta (eds.). Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133-166. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2011. Language and other cognitive systems. What is special about language? Language learning and development 7:263-278.10.4324/9780429301469-8Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130:33-49.10.1075/la.223.01choSuche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2014. Minimal recursion: exploring the prospects. In T. Roeper & M. Speas (eds.). Recursion: complexity in cognition, 1-15. New York: Spring.10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7_1Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2015a. Problems of projection: extension. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds.). Structures, stragtegies and beyond: studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 3-16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2015b. Problems and mysteries revisited. Lecture given the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute, Jerusalem, Isreal, November 2, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., & L., Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8:425-504.10.1007/978-94-015-6859-3_4Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., & Walker, E. 1978. The linguistic and psycholinguistic background. In E. Walker (ed.). Explorations in the biology of language, 15-26. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2014. Phase theory: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644037Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, B. 2010. Linguistics as a science. In A. Barber & R. J Stainton (eds.). Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, 371-377. Oxford: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, C. 1997. Local Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, C. 2003. Economy Conditions in Syntax. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds.). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 45-61. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9781405102537.2003.00004.xSuche in Google Scholar

de Villiers, J. & Roeper, T. (eds.). 2011. Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Dordrecth: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1688-9Suche in Google Scholar

Edelman, S. & Christiansen, M. 2003. How seriously should we take Minimalist syntax. Trends in Cognitive Science 7, 60-1.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00045-1Suche in Google Scholar

Eguren, L., Fernandez-Soriano, O., & Mendikoetxea, A. (eds.) 2016. Rethinking Parameters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190461737.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., Obata, M., & Seely, T. 2013. Economy of derivation and representation. In M. den Dikken (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, 487-514. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.019Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, N. & Levinson, S. 2009. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behaviour and Brain science 32, 429-492.10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSuche in Google Scholar

Everett, L. 1986. Piraha͂. In D. Derbyshire & G. Pullum (eds.). Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 1, 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, L. 1987. A lı́ngua Piraha͂ e a teoria da sintaxe: Descriça͂o, perspectivas e teoria. Campinas, Brazil: Editora da Unicamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Piraha͂. Current Anthropology 46.621–46.10.1086/431525Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, L. 2009. Piraha͂ culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language 85.405–42.10.1353/lan.0.0104Suche in Google Scholar

Fábregas, A., Mateu, J., & Putnam, M. 2015. Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. 2007. Mental spaces. In D. Geeraerts an&d H. Cuyckens (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 351-376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Friederici, A., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R., Moro, A. & Bolhuis, J. 2017. Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 713-22.10.1038/s41562-017-0184-4Suche in Google Scholar

Friederici, A., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R., Moro, A., & Bolhuis., J. 2017. Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour 1:713-722.10.1038/s41562-017-0184-4Suche in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.152Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language, 58-90. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Grewendorf, G., & Kremers, J. 2009. Phases and cycles: some problems with Phase Theory. The Linguistic Review 26:385-430.10.1515/tlir.2009.015Suche in Google Scholar

Grohmann, K. German is a multiple wh-fronting language. In Boeckx & Grohmann (eds.), Multiple wh-fronting, 99-130. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.64.08groSuche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. 1994. Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Harlow, S. 2010. Transformational grammar: evolution. In A. Barber & R. Stainton (eds.). Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, 752-770. Oxford: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinzen, W. 2012. The philosophical significance of Universal Grammar. Language Sciences 34, 635-649.10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.005Suche in Google Scholar

Hinzen, W., Sheehan, M. 2013. The Philosophy of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654833.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, J.-H. & Pan, H.-H. 2002. NP prominence and the Chinese reflexive ‘ziji’. Contemporary Linguistics, 1, 46-60.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 1994. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: A Study with Special Reference to Chinese. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511554292Suche in Google Scholar

Ibbotson, P. & Tomasello, M. 2016. Evidence rebuts Chomsky’s theory of language learning. Scientific American.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacob, P. 2010. The scope and limits of Chomsky's naturalism. In J. Bricmont & J. Franck (eds.). Chomsky's Notebook, 211-234. Columbia University Press.10.7312/bric14474-011Suche in Google Scholar

Joos, M. (ed.). 1957. Readings in linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Larson, R. 2010. Grammar as science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: the MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, H. & Sheng, X. 2017. A study on the garden path phenomenon from the perspective of generative grammar. Journal of language teaching and research 8, 1190-4.10.17507/jltr.0806.21Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, F. 2017. A refutation of universal grammar. Lingua 193:1-22.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.003Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, D.-Q. 2005. Hanyu guanxi congju biaoji leixing chutan. Zhongguo yuwen. 304. 3-15.Suche in Google Scholar

McCloskey, J. A note on predicates and heads in Irish clausal syntax. In Carnie, Harley & Dooley (eds.), Verb first: on the synatx of verb-initial languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Mosaffa Jahromi, A. 2011. Expletives in modern Persian. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 1, 45-56.10.4312/ala.1.3.45-56Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D. & Rodrigues, C. 2009a. Piraha͂ exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85.355–404.10.1353/lan.0.0107Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D. & Rodrigues, C. 2009b. Evidence and argumentation: a reply to Everett (2009). Language 85(3), 671-681.10.1353/lan.0.0140Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2004. Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. In Pica, P. (ed.) Linguistic Variation Yearbook, vol. 4. 181-234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/livy.4.06newSuche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2005. Possible and probable languages: a generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 2006. Possible and probable languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Nola R., Sankey H. 2000. A Selective Survey of Theories of Scientific Method. In Nola, R., Sankey H. (eds.). After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend. p.1-65. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9Suche in Google Scholar

Penke, M., & Rosenbach, A. 2007. What counts as evidence in linguistics? An introduction. In M. Penke & A. Rosenbach (eds.). What counts as evidence in linguistics, 1-50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/bct.7Suche in Google Scholar

Picallo, C. (ed.) 2014. Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York:William Morrow and Company.10.1037/e412952005-009Suche in Google Scholar

Poole, G. 1995. Constraints on local economy. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.). Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, 385-398. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. 2010. Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.). Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 1-57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.001Suche in Google Scholar

Sampson, G. 2005. The ‘language instinct’ debate: revised version. London: continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Si, F.-Z. 2009. Chomskyan linguistics and the scientific methodolody in linguistic study. Asian Social Science 5:82-86.10.5539/ass.v5n5p82Suche in Google Scholar

Tang, D.-Z. 2006. Yu guanxi congju youguan de santiao yuxu leixing yuanze. Zhongguo yuwen. 314. 409-422.Suche in Google Scholar

ter Beek, J. 2004. Is Dutch a multiple fronting language? Linguistics in the Netherlands 21, 13-24.10.1075/avt.21.05beeSuche in Google Scholar

Wilder, C., & Gärtner, H.-M. 1997. Introduction. In C. Wilder, H.-M. & M. Bierwisch (eds.). The role of economy principles in linguistic theory, 1-35. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783050072173-002Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, L.-J. 1994. The antecedent of ‘ziji’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 21,123-141.Suche in Google Scholar

Zwicky, A. 1980. “Internal” and “external” evidence in linguistics. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2:598-604.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1980.2.192613Suche in Google Scholar