Noun/pronoun asymmetry in Polish: Against the nominal perspective and the DP-hypothesis

References

Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase and its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ackema, P. & A. Neeleman. 2013. Subset controllers in agreement relations. Morphology 23(2). 291–323.10.1007/s11525-013-9218-4Search in Google Scholar

Adger, D. 2003. Core syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Adger, D. & P. Svenonius. 2010. Features in minimalist syntax. Available at <http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000825>. Last accessed 17 Apr 2018.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, M. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65–87.10.1017/S0022226700011567Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bartnik, A. 2014. Determiners and possessives in Old English and Polish. In A. Bondaruk, G. Dalmi & A. Grosu, (eds.), Advances in the syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case, 247–266. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.217.10barSearch in Google Scholar

Beaver, D. & B. Clark. 2003. Always and only: Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11(4). 323–362.10.1023/A:1025542629721Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, P. & C. Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2. In L. Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biberauer, T. & I. Roberts. 2010. “Subjects, tense and verb-agreement”. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 263–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.008Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Borik, O. & M.T. Espinal. 2015. Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: Definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review 32(2). 167–225.10.1515/tlr-2014-0023Search in Google Scholar

Bosse, S., B. Bruening & Yamada, M. 2012. Affected experiencers. In Natural language and linguistic theory 30. 1185–1230.10.1007/s11049-012-9177-1Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2005. On the locality of Left Branch Extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59(1). 1–45.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2008. “On the clausal and NP structure of Serbo-Croatian”. In R. Compton, M. Goledzinowska & U. Savchenko (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The 7 Toronto Meeting, 2006, 42–75. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2008a. What will you have, DP or NP? Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 37. 101–114.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2009. The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. Proceeding of the University of Novi Sad Workshop on Generative Syntax 1. 53–73.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2013. Adjectival escapades. In S. Franks, M. Dickinson, G. Fowler, M. Whitcombe & K. Zanon (eds.), Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Languistics 21, 1–25. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2016. Getting really edgy: On the edge of the edge. Linguistic Inquiry 47(1). 1-33.10.1162/LING_a_00203Search in Google Scholar

Büring, D. & K. Hartmann. 2001. The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19. 229–281.10.1023/A:1010653115493Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. & M. Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110804010.145Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. University of Massachusetts: PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Caruso, Ž. 2012. The syntax of nominal expressions in articleless languages: a split-DP analysis of Croatian nouns. Stuttgart: Institut für Linguistik /Anglistik der Universität Stuttgart PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Cegłowski, P. 2017. The internal structure of nominal expressions: Reflections on extractability, fronting and phasehood. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–53. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Citko, B. 2014. Phase theory. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644037Search in Google Scholar

Constantinou, H. 2014. Intensifiers: Meaning and distribution. London: University College London PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Despić, M. 2013. Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 239–270.10.1162/LING_a_00126Search in Google Scholar

Despić, M. 2014. Intensifiers, focus, and clitics: Is pronoun position truly an argument for D in SC?. In L. Schürcks, A. Giannakidou & U. Etxeberria (eds.), The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond, 39–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614512790.39Search in Google Scholar

Dufter, A. & D. Jacob (eds.). 2009. Focus and background in Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.112Search in Google Scholar

Eckardt, R. 2002. Reanalysing selbst Natural Language Semantics 9(4). 371–412.10.1023/A:1014875209883Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. & R. Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4). 555–595.10.1162/002438901753373005Search in Google Scholar

Eschenberg, A. 1999. Polish focus structure. Buffalo: State University of New York Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Frascarelli, M. & R. Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German an Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form, 87–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.07fraSearch in Google Scholar

Gast, V. 2006. The grammar of identity. Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(1). 39–81.10.1007/s11049-006-9006-5Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, G. 2002. The functional structure of noun phrases. In: C. Guglielmo (ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP, Vol.1, 54–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goncharov, J. 2015. In search of reference: The case of the Russian adjectival intensifier samyj. Toronto: University of Toronto PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, J. K. 2003. Infomation structure and referential giveness/newness: How much belongs in the grammar? In S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International10.21248/hpsg.2003.8Search in Google Scholar

Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 122–142. Stanford, CA, USA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Haug, D. T. T. & T. Nikitina. 2016. Feature sharing in agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(3). 865–910.10.1007/s11049-015-9321-9Search in Google Scholar

Junghanns, U. 1997. On the so-called èto-cleft construction. In M. Lindseth & S. Franks (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics The Indiana Meeting of 1996, 166–190. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Huszcza, R. 1980. Tematyczno-rematyczna struktura zdania w języku polskim [Thethematic-rhematic sentence structure in the Polish language]. Polonica 6. 57–71.Search in Google Scholar

Jurczyk, R. 2015. The logical-semantic content of subject: A configurational view from syntax and LF. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 51(1). 89–131.10.1515/psicl-2015-0004Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S. 2011. Focus particles at syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic interfaces: The acquisition of only and even in English. University of Hawaii: PhD dissertation.10.1080/10489223.2012.662870Search in Google Scholar

Kleemann, A. 2005. Distribution and interpretation of the German focus particle nur ‘only’ in sentences and DPs. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 1. 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

Kornai, A. 1986. Logical types and linguistic types. Tertium Non Datur 3. 241–255.Search in Google Scholar

König, E. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

König, E. & P. Siemund. 1999. Intensifiers as targets and sources of semantic change. In K. von Heusinger & R. Eckardt (eds.), Meaning change – meaning variation. Konstanz: Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. 97–109.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. & I. Heim. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M. 1999. ‘Compositionality’ and ‘Focus’. In R. Wilson, F. Keil & A. Pierce (eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, 152–153, 315–317. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55. 243–276.10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2Search in Google Scholar

Kučerová, I. 2007. The syntax of giveness. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609–665.Search in Google Scholar

Los, B. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. Jose Lopez-Couso & B. Los (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 21–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 69–109.10.1162/002438906775321184Search in Google Scholar

Meurman-Solin, A., M. Jose Lopez-Couso & B. Los. 2012 (eds.). Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Miechowicz-Mathiasen, K. 2013. What the adnominal intensifier sam and Left Branch Extractions tell us about the structure of Polish nominal projections. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49. 205–260.10.1515/psicl-2013-0008Search in Google Scholar

Montague, R. 1970. Universal Grammar. Theoria 36. 373–398.10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00434.xSearch in Google Scholar

Neeleman, A. & R. Vermeulen. 2012. The syntactic expression of information structure. In A. Neeleman & R. Vermeulen (eds.), The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast: An interface based approach, 1–38. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511458Search in Google Scholar

Partee, B.H. 1984. Compositionality. In F. Landman & F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of-formal semantics: Proceedings of the 4th Amsterdam Colloquium, 281–311. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. & E. Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W.K. Williams (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar

Pęzik, P. 2012. Wyszukiwarka PELCRA dla danych NKJP [The PELCRA search engine for NKJP]. In A. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R. Górski & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [National Corpus of the Polish Language], 253–273. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Progovac, L. 1998. Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics 34. 165–179.10.1017/S0022226797006865Search in Google Scholar

Radford, A. 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811319Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, M. 2008. A pseudo-biclausal analysis of Slavonic clefts. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics. 63–85.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.10.1007/BF02342617Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, P. 2002. Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje 3(1–2). 159–170.Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, P. 2009. Fraza przedimkowa w polszczyźnie [The DP in Polish] Warsaw: University of Warsaw PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, P. 2012a. Is nP Part of Universal Grammar?”, Journal of Universal Language 13(2). 119–144.10.22425/jul.2012.13.2.119Search in Google Scholar

Rutkowski, P. 2012b. The syntax of floating intensifiers in Polish and its implications for the determiner phrase hypothesis. In Z. Antić, C. B. Chang, E. Cibelli, J. Hong, M.J. Houser, C.S. Sandy & M. Toosarvandani (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Theoretical Approaches to Argument Structure, 321–333.Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v32i1.3471Search in Google Scholar

Schwartzschild, R. 1999. GIVENess, avoid F, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7. 141–177.10.1023/A:1008370902407Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, M. & W. Hinzen. 2011. Moving towards the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37(3–4). 405–458. Available at <http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001300>. Last accessed 17 Feb 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, A. 1993. Syntactic weight vs. information structure and word order variation in Polish. Journal of Linguistics 29. 233–265.10.1017/S0022226700000323Search in Google Scholar

Sigurðsson, H. 1996. Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57. 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Stjepanović, S. 2003. A word order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3. 139–177.10.1075/livy.3.07stjSearch in Google Scholar

Tabakowska, E. 1989. On pragmatic functions of the particle to in Polish. In H. Weydt, (ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln, 535–545. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Tajsner, P. 1998. XP-fronting in Polish. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 34. 75–99.Search in Google Scholar

Talić, A. 2017. From A to N and back: functional and bare projections in the domain on N and A. University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Tałasiewicz, M. 2006. Filozofia składni [The philosophy of syntax]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.Search in Google Scholar

Ura, H. 2000. Checking theory and grammatical functions in universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

von Stechow, A. 1989. Focusing and backgrounding operators. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft. Universität Konstanz: Technical Report 6.Search in Google Scholar

Vangsnes, Ø. 2002. Icelandic expletive constructions and the distribution of subject types. In P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP, 43–70. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Willim, E. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, 319–346). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Willim, E. 2012. O przyczynach zmian głównych kierunków badawczych w gramatyce generatywnej Noama Chomsky’ego (1957–2007) [On the reasons of changes of main research approaches in Noam Chomsky’s generative grammar (1957–2007)]. InP. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne, 18–86.Łódź: Primum Verbum.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. 1996. On NegP and the structure of the Polish clause. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 31. 65–96.Search in Google Scholar

Witkoś, J. 2015. Minimalna elastyczność faz [Minimal flexibility of phases]. In P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Od zdań do aktów mowy – rozważania lingwistyczne i filozoficzne, 74–91. Łódź: Primum Verbum.Search in Google Scholar

Zamparelli, R. 1995. Layers in the determiner phrase. University of Rochester PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zanon, K. 2015. On hybrid coordination and an quantifier rising in Russian. Indiana University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zanon, K. 2018. Focus association with only in Russian. Paper presented at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) 27, Stanford University, May 4–6. 2018. Available at: <http://kzanon.com/scholarship/>. Last accessed 5 Jun 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Zlatić, L. 2014. Definiteness and structure of NPs in Slavic. In L. Schürcks, A. Giannakidou & U. Etxeberria (eds.), The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond, 17–38. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614512790.17Search in Google Scholar