Startseite Sozialwissenschaften Populism Is a Distraction
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Populism Is a Distraction

  • Jan Nederveen Pieterse EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Juni 2018

Abstract

Should a discussion of populism be concerned with populism—along with revulsion of its various extremisms (perhaps along with hints of social and psychopathology and hence, implicit endorsement of ‘moderate’ positions)? Or should it rather be concerned with the failure of institutions and the misbehavior of elites in a world in which 8 billionaires own as much as half the world population? Option a) will yield a totally different and probably somewhat more predictable discussion than option b), which may include ‘from bad to worse’. According to option c) different types of populism—including ‘pluto-populism’—should generate different treatments. This discussion follows options b) and c).

References

Authers, John. 2018. “Fears over LatAm Populism Overdone as Stocks Play Catch-Up.” Financial Times 1/25: 20.Suche in Google Scholar

Bello, Walden. 2015. “The Left in Power.” The Nation, April 6, 112–115. (150th anniversary issue)Suche in Google Scholar

Bello, Walden. 2017. “Duterte’s Revolt Against Liberal Democracy.” Global Dialogue 7: 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Gordon. 2017. “Brexit Is an Opportunity to Make a Federal United Kingdom.” Financial Times 3/28.Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, Thomas. 2000. One Market under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy. New York: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar

Galston, William A. 2018. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300228922.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Judis, John B. 2016. The Populist Explosion. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Suche in Google Scholar

King, Stephen D. 2017. Grave New World: The End of Globalization, the Return of History. London: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, Nelson. 2016. “ Twenty-First Century ‘Populism’: Not for the Unions and a Good Thing Too.” The Forum 14 (3): 235–247.10.1515/for-2016-0025Suche in Google Scholar

Luce, Edward. 2017. “A Field Day for America’s One per Cent.” Financial Times 2/27.Suche in Google Scholar

Mahler, J. 2017. “That’s Great Television.” New York Times Magazine 4/4.Suche in Google Scholar

Mayer, Jane. 2016. Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812293784Suche in Google Scholar

Nederveen, Pieterse. Jan 2017. “The Atlantic Twin Tunnel Vision.” Global-E 10 (71): 10/31.Suche in Google Scholar

Rathbone, J. P. 2018. “The Year of Living Dangerously.” Financial Times 2/8: 7.Suche in Google Scholar

Techau, Jan. 2016. “Sophisticated States are Failing, so Politicians Need to Take Risks.” Financial Times 4/20: 9.Suche in Google Scholar

Wolf, Martin. 2017a. “America’s Pluto-Populism Laid Bare.” Financial Times 5/3.Suche in Google Scholar

Wolf, Martin. 2017b. “Inequality Is a Threat to Our Democracies.” Financial Times 12/20: 9.Suche in Google Scholar

Zielonka, Jan. 2017. Counter-Revolution: Liberal Europe in Retreat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-06-09
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2018-0020/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen