Abstract
The research addressed the economic evaluation of nuclear energy, coal, oil and natural gas in various cycle configurations with different distillation technologies. A comparison between fossil and nuclear energy sources is discussed. A comprehensive review of all desalination plants using fossil and nuclear energy with cogeneration is also included and discussed. Computational model was used to evaluate nuclear and non-nuclear desalination plants. Four possibilities were discussed. In this first case, a nuclear gas cycle integrated with a MED desalination plant was found to have the lowest cost in the gas cycle. While the nuclear steam cycle integrated with RO has the lowest cost compared to oil and natural gas. In the third case, the combined nuclear cycle was discussed and it was found that the combined nuclear cycle associated with RO has the lowest cost. In the last case, the evaluation of a heat-only desalination plant was conducted among all sources, and it was found that the nuclear plant with RO and MED has the lowest cost. In addition, the completed nuclear desalination plant was subjected to five scenarios to calculate and estimate at which capacity the plant provides the best values. The results show that nuclear desalination with gas cycle is the most economical among the oil and natural gas options.
Funding source: National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2-17-02-001-0056
-
Author contributions: Conceptualization, S.U.-D.K. and J.O.; methodology, S.U.-D.K.; software, Khan, S.U.-D.K.; validation, S.U.-D.K. and J.O.; formal analysis, J.O.; investigation, S.U.-D.K.; resources, S.U.-D.K.; data curation, S.U.-D.K. and J.O.; writing – original draft preparation, S.U.-D.K.; writing – review and editing, S.U.-D.K. and J.O.; visualization J.O.; supervision, S.U.-D.K.; project administration, J.O;
-
Research funding: This research was funded by National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, grant number 2-17-02-001-0056.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Alagumalai, A., Anvari, S., and Awad, M.M. (2022). Water: a global grand challenge and a path forward. In: Solar-driven water treatment. Elsevier, USA, pp. 1–35.10.1016/B978-0-323-90991-4.00005-0Suche in Google Scholar
Alessi, Y.M. and Al-Rabiah, A.A. (2022). A feasibility study of utilizing nuclear energy for an existing MED-TVC desalination plant. Appl. Sci. 12: 9506, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199506.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Mutaz, I.S. (2001). Potential of nuclear desalination in the Arabian Gulf countries. Desalination 135: 187–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(01)80001-1.Suche in Google Scholar
And, T.C. (2019). Nuclear power reactor characteristics, 2015/16 pocket guide. World-nuclear.org, Available at: https://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/WNA/Publications/Nuclear_Information/Pocket%20Guide%20Reactors.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Antenucci, A., Crespo del Granado, P., Gjorgiev, B., and Sansavini, G. (2019). Can models for long-term decarbonization policies guarantee security of power supply? a perspective from gas and power sector coupling. Energy Strategy Rev. 26: 100410, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100410.Suche in Google Scholar
Arabic Technologies (2020). Home. SWCC, Gov.sa, Available at: https://www.swcc.gov.sa/en.Suche in Google Scholar
Bouaichaoui, Y., Belkaid, A., and Amzert, S.A. (2012). Economic and safety aspects in nuclear seawater desalination. Procedia Eng. 33: 146–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1187.Suche in Google Scholar
Bouckaert, S., Mazauric, V., and Maïzi, N. (2014). Expanding renewable energy by implementing demand response. Energy Proc. 61: 1844–1847, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.226.Suche in Google Scholar
Coal Formation (2000). Energyeducation.ca, Available at: https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Coal_formation.Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, S., Saygin, D., Deane, J., Miketa, A., Gutierrez, L., Ó Gallachóir, B., and Gielen, D. (2018). Planning the European power sector transformation: the REmap modelling framework and its insights. Energy Strategy Rev. 22: 147–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.011.Suche in Google Scholar
Collins, S., Deane, J.P., and Ó Gallachóir, B. (2017). Adding value to EU energy policy analysis using a multi-model approach with an EU-28 electricity dispatch model. Energy 130: 433–447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Cost and performance characteristics of new generating technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2022 (2022) Eia.gov, Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/assumptions/pdf/table_8.2.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Csik, B.J. and Kupitz, J. (1997). Nuclear power applications: supplying heat for homes and industries. IAEA Bull. 39: 21–25.Suche in Google Scholar
DesalData (no date). Desaldata.com, Available at: https://www.desaldata.com.Suche in Google Scholar
Drouineau, M., Maïzi, N., and Mazauric, V. (2014). Impacts of intermittent sources on the quality of power supply: the key role of reliability indicators. Appl. Energy 116: 333–343, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.069.Suche in Google Scholar
El-Dessouky, H.T. and Ettouney, H.M. (2002). Fundamentals of salt water desalination. London, England: Elsevier Science.Suche in Google Scholar
El-Wakil, M.M. (2002). LSC powerplant technology, 1st ed. Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill Higher Education.Suche in Google Scholar
e-Media Resources (2004). EES: Engineering equation solver, Fchartsoftware.com, Available at: http://www.fchartsoftware.com/ees/ (Accessed 6 March 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Freshwater from the seas (2014). Iaea.org, Available at: https://www.iaea.org/publications/magazines/bulletin/43-2/freshwater-seas (Accessed 7 March 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
George, M. and Banerjee, R. (2011). A methodology for analysis of impacts of grid integration of renewable energy. Energy Pol. 39: 1265–1276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.054.Suche in Google Scholar
Giraldo, J.S., Gotham, D.J., Nderitu, D.G., Preckel, P.V., and Mize, D.J. (2012). Fundamentals of nuclear power. Technical report, State Utility Forecasting Group.Suche in Google Scholar
Heylen, E., Deconinck, G., and Van Hertem, D. (2018). Review and classification of reliability indicators for power systems with a high share of renewable energy sources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 97: 554–568, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.032.Suche in Google Scholar
History of oil (2021). EKT interactive, Available at: https://www.ektinteractive.com/history-of-oil/ (Accessed 6 March 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
IAEA (2013). Toolkit on nuclear desalination: DEEP 5 user manual. IAEA, Vienna, Austria.Suche in Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2017a). New technologies for seawater desalination using nuclear energy. In: New technologies for seawater desalination using nuclear energy, IAEA, Austria, pp. 1–184.Suche in Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2017b). Opportunities for cogeneration with nuclear energy. In: Opportunities for cogeneration with nuclear energy, IAEA, Austria, pp. 1–91.Suche in Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2019a). Desalination economic evaluation program (DEEP). In: Desalination economic evaluation program (DEEP), IAEA, Austria, p. 1, Available at: https://www.iaea.org/publications/6049/desalination-economic-evaluation-program-deep.Suche in Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2019b). Nuclear desalination of sea water proceedings of an international conference in Taejon, Republic of Korea, 26–30 May 1997. In: Nuclear desalination of sea water proceedings of an international conference in Taejon, Republic of Korea, 26–30 May 1997, IAEA, Austria, pp. 1–557.Suche in Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2019c). Nuclear heat applications: design aspects and operating experience. In: Nuclear heat applications: design aspects and operating experience, IAEA, Austria, pp. 1–382, Available at: https://www.iaea.org/publications/5353/nuclear-heat-applications-design-aspects-and-operating-experience.Suche in Google Scholar
Kavvadias, K.C. and Khamis, I. (2014). Sensitivity analysis and probabilistic assessment of seawater desalination costs fueled by nuclear and fossil fuel. Energy Pol. 74: S24–S30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.033.Suche in Google Scholar
Khamis, I. (2010). Overview of nuclear desalination technologies & costs. Oecd-nea.org, Available at: https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/workshops/nucogen/presentations/8_Khamis_Overview-nuclear-desalination.pdf (Accessed 7 March 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Khan, S.U.-D. and Orfi, J. (2021). Socio-economic and environmental impact of nuclear desalination. Water 13: 1637, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121637.Suche in Google Scholar
Khan, S.U.-D. and Nakhabov, A. (Eds.) (2020). Nuclear reactor technology development and utilization. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (USA).Suche in Google Scholar
Khan, S.U.D., Haider, S., El-Leathy, A., Rana, U.A., Danish, S.N., and Ullah, R. (2017). Development and techno-economic analysis of small modular nuclear reactor and desalination system across Middle East and North Africa region. Desalination 406: 51–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.008.Suche in Google Scholar
Khan, S.U.D. and Khan, S.U.D. (2017). Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (KANUPP): as case study for techno-economic assessment of nuclear power coupled with water desalination. Energy 127: 372–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.055.Suche in Google Scholar
Khan, S.U.D., Khan, S.U.D., and Peng, M. (2020). Nuclear power plant systems. In: Nuclear reactor technology development and utilization. Elsevier, USA, pp. 433–471.10.1016/B978-0-12-818483-7.00014-7Suche in Google Scholar
Khuwaileh, B.A., Alzaabi, F.E., Almomani, B., and Ali, M. (2022). Technology options and cost estimates of nuclear powered desalination in the United Arab Emirates. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.: 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2022.2100838.Suche in Google Scholar
Kim, H.S. and No, H.C. (2012). Thermal coupling of HTGRs and MED desalination plants, and its performance and cost analysis for nuclear desalination. Desalination 303: 17–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, J., Sun, H., Ye, X., Gao, S., and Yang, J. (2019). Economic evaluation of 20,000 M3/Day seawater desalination coupling with floating reactor nuclear power plant. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 300: 042053, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/300/4/042053.Suche in Google Scholar
Mansouri, N.Y. and Ghoniem, A.F. (2017). Does nuclear desalination make sense for Saudi Arabia? Desalination 406: 37–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.009.Suche in Google Scholar
Matar, W. and Elshurafa, A.M. (2018). Electricity transmission formulations in multi-sector national planning models: an illustration using the KAPSARC energy model. Energy Rep. 4: 328–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.04.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Megahed, M.M. (2009). Feasibility of nuclear power and desalination on El-Dabaa site. Desalination 246: 238–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.054.Suche in Google Scholar
Naizghi, M.S., Tesfay, W.G., and Fath, H.E.S. (2011). Nuclear desalination and its viability for UAE. The Sharjah International Conference on Nuclear and Renewable Energy Energies for the 21st Century (SHJ-NRE11), Sharjah, UAE.Suche in Google Scholar
Nuclear desalination (2017). Iaea.org, Available at: https://www.iaea.org/topics/non-electric-applications/nuclear-desalination.Suche in Google Scholar
Nuclear Energy Agency (2011). Carbon pricing, power markets and the competitiveness of nuclear power. OECD, Paris.Suche in Google Scholar
Nuclear Energy Agency and International Energy Agency (2020). Projected costs of generating electricity 2020. OECD, France.10.1787/a6002f3b-enSuche in Google Scholar
Nuclear Power Reactors (2003). World-nuclear.org, Available at: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-power-reactors.aspx.Suche in Google Scholar
Paul, S. and Lama, W. (2020). Civilian uses and challenges of nuclear energy. In: Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–9.10.1007/978-3-319-71057-0_48-1Suche in Google Scholar
Ricotti, M.E. and Fomin, R.V. (2020). Small modular reactors. In: Nuclear reactor technology development and utilization. Elsevier, USA, pp. 187–211.10.1016/B978-0-12-818483-7.00005-6Suche in Google Scholar
Rothwell, G. (2004). Nuclear power economics. In: Encyclopedia of energy. Elsevier, USA, pp. 383–394.10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00142-XSuche in Google Scholar
Saadooni, J. (2018). Desalination option in the Tunisia nuclear power project. In: Proceedings of the 16th INPRO dialogue forum on opportunities and issues in non-electric applications of nuclear energy. Vienna, Austria, pp. 12–14.Suche in Google Scholar
Saadouni, J. (2018). Desalination option in the Tunisia nuclear power project, Iaea.org, Available at: https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/INPRO/df16/Day-2/Tunisia_saadouni.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Sánchez-Cervera, I.G., Kavvadias, K.C., and Khamis, I. (2013). DE-TOP: a new IAEA tool for the thermodynamic evaluation of nuclear desalination. Desalination 321: 103–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Seneviratne, B.Y.G. (no date). Research projects show nuclear desalination economical, Ans.org, Available at: http://www2.ans.org/pubs/magazines/nn/docs/2007-4-3.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Shatilla, Y. (2020). Nuclear desalination. In: Nuclear reactor technology development and utilization. Elsevier, USA, pp. 247–270.10.1016/B978-0-12-818483-7.00007-XSuche in Google Scholar
“Synthetic” fuels, oil shale and tar sands (1991). Psu.edu, Available at: https://personal.ems.psu.edu/∼radovic/Chapter10.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World (2018). Main. MIT energy initiative, Available at: https://energy.mit.edu/research/future-nuclear-energy-carbon-constrained-world.Suche in Google Scholar
Tilehnoee, M.H. (2011). A comparison between fossil and nuclear power plants pollution and their environmental effects. J. Power Energy Eng. 5.Suche in Google Scholar
UN-Water (2003). UN world Water development report 2003, UN-Water, Available at: https://www.unwater.org/publications/un-world-water-development-report-2003.Suche in Google Scholar
User’s Manual (no date). Desalination economic evaluation program (DEEP), Iaea.org, Available at: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/CMS-14.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, S. (2006). Analysis of water production costs of a nuclear desalination plant with a nuclear heating reactor coupled with MED processes. Desalination 190: 287–294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.08.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, S. and Zheng, W. (2002). Coupling of nuclear heating reactor with desalination process. Desalination 142: 187–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00438-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Zohuri, B. (2020). Generation IV nuclear reactors. In: Nuclear reactor technology development and utilization. Elsevier, USA, pp. 213–246.10.1016/B978-0-12-818483-7.00006-8Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Scaling effect on cesium diffusion in compacted MX-80 bentonite for buffer materials in HLW repository
- Enhanced heat transfer in corrugated plate fin heat sink
- Discussion of options to increase the control drum worth in fast reactor
- New semi-empirical systematic of (p,n) reaction cross section at 7.5 MeV
- Computational analysis of nuclear desalination system under various configurations
- Performance analysis of nuclear powered desalination unit based on MED-TVC: a case study for Saudi Arabia
- Analysis of 4-inch cold leg top-slot break LOCA in ATLAS experimental facility using MARS-KS
- Evaluating the performance of Indonesia’s nuclear energy program using INPRO methodology
- Thermal hydraulic analysis of VVER spent fuels stored in vault dry system under different operating and design conditions
- Comparative analysis of swelling and porosity evolution in UO2 fuel via two approaches
- Euler–Maruyama algorithm in estimating UGV path and location in nuclear emergency and security applications
- Modeling and simulation of deposited energy gain via irradiation of heavy ion beams on the fusion reactor contains spherical fuel capsules with foam
- Calendar of events
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Scaling effect on cesium diffusion in compacted MX-80 bentonite for buffer materials in HLW repository
- Enhanced heat transfer in corrugated plate fin heat sink
- Discussion of options to increase the control drum worth in fast reactor
- New semi-empirical systematic of (p,n) reaction cross section at 7.5 MeV
- Computational analysis of nuclear desalination system under various configurations
- Performance analysis of nuclear powered desalination unit based on MED-TVC: a case study for Saudi Arabia
- Analysis of 4-inch cold leg top-slot break LOCA in ATLAS experimental facility using MARS-KS
- Evaluating the performance of Indonesia’s nuclear energy program using INPRO methodology
- Thermal hydraulic analysis of VVER spent fuels stored in vault dry system under different operating and design conditions
- Comparative analysis of swelling and porosity evolution in UO2 fuel via two approaches
- Euler–Maruyama algorithm in estimating UGV path and location in nuclear emergency and security applications
- Modeling and simulation of deposited energy gain via irradiation of heavy ion beams on the fusion reactor contains spherical fuel capsules with foam
- Calendar of events