Startseite Providence and Prudence in Kant’s Theology and Ethics
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Providence and Prudence in Kant’s Theology and Ethics

  • Khafiz Kerimov EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. Dezember 2024

Abstract

This article seeks to reevaluate Kant’s treatment of prudence in his ethics, challenging prevalent interpretations that relegate prudence in Kant to mere technique (skill). Scattered across Kant’s texts, there are indications that prudence (practical judgment) fulfills an essential function in Kant’s ethics: by negotiating the contingencies of an uncertain world, prudence adapts the moral imperative to mutable circumstances. However, Kant is convinced that despair is inevitable for humans, when confronted with the inherent uncertainty and indifference of the natural world. The only remedy against this despair for Kant is faith in a providential God: Kant introduces reliance on God’s providence to reconcile human practical reason with chance and nature’s capriciousness. The article thus underscores the inseparable link between human prudence and God’s providence for living a moral life in the Kantian sense.


Corresponding author: Khafiz Kerimov, Tutor (Assistant Professor), St. John’s College, Annapolis, 709 Druid Hill Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21401, USA, E-mail:

References

Primary Sources

Citations of Kant’s works are made to Kants gesammelte Schriften, herausgegeben von der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols, Berlin: de Gruyter (1902 –), in the following form: abbreviated title, volume, page number, line number, with the exception of Kritik der reinen Vernunft, which is cited with reference to the pagination of the original editions of the first (1781) or second (1787) editions of the work, indicated by A or B.Suche in Google Scholar

I use the English translations of these texts from The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992 –), with occasional minor modifications.Suche in Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allison, H. “Reflective Judgment and the Application of Logic to Nature: Kant’s Deduction of the Principle of Purposiveness as an Answer to Hume.” In Strawson and Kant, edited by H.-J. Glock, 169–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Aubenque, P. 1963. La prudence chez Aristote. Paris: PUF.Suche in Google Scholar

Aubenque, P. 2014. “La Prudence Chez Kant.” In La prudence chez Aristote, 186–212. Paris: PUF.Suche in Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2015. “The Inner Voice: Kant on Conditionality and God as Cause.” In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, edited by J. Aufderheide, and R. Bader, 158–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Beck, L. 1996. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Beiser, F. 2006. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good.” In Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by P. Guyer, 588–629. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brague, R. 1997. “Prudence, Prévoyance, Providence.” Communio 134 (XXII): 5–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Brandt, R. 2005. “Klugheit bei Kant.” In Klugheit, edited by W. Kersting, 98–132. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Suche in Google Scholar

Brandt, R. 2007. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Butts, R. 1990. “Teleology and Scientific Method in Kant’s Critique of Judgment.” Nous 24 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215610.Suche in Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H. 2017. “Why Must We Presuppose the Systematicity of Nature?” In Kant and the Laws of Nature, edited by M. Massimi, and A. Breitenbach, 71–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goy, I. 2014. “Kant’s Theory of Biology and the Argument from Design.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by E. Watkins, and I. Goy, 203–20. Göttingen: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Graband, C. 2015. Klugheit bei Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. New York: Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hare, J. 2000. “Kant on Recognizing Our Duties as God’s Commands.” Faith and Philosophy 17 (4): 459–78. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil200017430.Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, B. 2018. From Principles to Practice: Normativity and Judgment in Ethics and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirkland, S. 2007. “The Temporality of Phronêsis in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Ancient Philosophy 27 (1): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200727131.Suche in Google Scholar

Klein, J. 2021. “On Serpents and Doves: The Systematic Relationship between Prudence and Morality in Kant’s Political Philosophy.” Kant-Studien 112 (1): 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2021-0003.Suche in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, P. 1995. “What Do the Virtuous Hope for? Re-reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, Vol. 1, 91–112. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 1996. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuehn, M. 2002. Kant: A Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, M. 2011. Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence, tr. Daniel O. Dahlstrom and Corey Dyck. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Nelson, E. 2004. “Moral and Political Prudence in Kant.” International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3): 305–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq200444326.Suche in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2001. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. 1983. “Kant after Virtue.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (4): 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748308602007.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmquist, S. 2009. “Kant’s Religious Argument for the Existence of God: The Ultimate Dependence of Human Destiny on Divine Assistance.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil20092611.Suche in Google Scholar

Pasternack, L. 2014. “Faith, Knowledge, and the Highest Good.” In Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, edited by L. Pasternack. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwaiger, C. 1999. Kategorische und andere Imperative. Zur Entwicklung von Kants praktischer Philosophie bis 1785. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Suche in Google Scholar

Sussman, D. 2001. The Idea of Humanity: Anthropology and Anthroponomy in Kant’s Ethics. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Teufel, Thomas. “Kant’s Transcendental Principle of Purposiveness and the ‘Maxim of the Lawfulness of Empirical Laws.” In Kant and the Laws of Nature, edited by M. Massimi, and A. Breitenbach, 108–28. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Timmermann, J. 2007. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. 2022. Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasi, G. 2016. “God, the Highest Good, and the Rationality of Faith: Reflections on Kant’s Moral Proof of the Existence of God.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by T. Höwing, 111–30. New York: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomaszewska, A. 2022. Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates. New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Walker, R. 2006. “Kant and Transcendental Arguments.” In Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by P. Guyer, 238–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Willaschek, M. 2016. “Must We Believe in the Realizability of Our Ends?” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by T. Höwing, 223–44. New York: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Zammito, J. 1992. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-26
Accepted: 2024-11-04
Published Online: 2024-12-30
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 1.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jtph-2024-0012/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen