Home Proportionality and Purposiveness in Kant’s Highest Good
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Proportionality and Purposiveness in Kant’s Highest Good

  • Amir Yaretzky ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2025

Abstract

The task of this paper is to offer an interpretation of Kant’s notion of proportionality between morality and happiness, which is fundamental to his conception of the highest good. Kant claims that the complete good of humans as both natural and rational beings is a proportionate relation between virtue and happiness. He takes this to mean that nature is purposively designed so it accords with morality, which is only possible in a divine world where God secures this responsiveness. The paper shows various difficulties with this claim and argues that they can be resolved by a nuanced interpretation of what Kant might mean by “happiness”. This finally leads to a conception of proportionality modeled on Kant’s aesthetics.


Corresponding author: Amir Yaretzky, Universität Potsdam, Berlin, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: Minerva Foundation

References

Bader, R. M. 2015. “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, edited by R. M. Bader, and J. Aufderheide, 183–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, M. 2016. “Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (3): 527–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12135.Search in Google Scholar

Dobe, J. K. 2020. “Kant’s Aesthetics and the Problem of Happiness.” Kantian Review 25 (1): 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415419000451.Search in Google Scholar

Friedlander, E. 2021. “On Different Ways to the Highest Good.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 42 (2): 373–91. ‏https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj202142220.Search in Google Scholar

Godess-Riccitelli, M. 2021.“The Problem of the Highest Good: An Aesthetic Outlook.” In The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress, edited by C. Serck-Hanssen, and B. Himmelmann, 1423–30. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110701357-139Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1781–1787/1998. “Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” In Critique of Pure Reason, transl. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1785/1996. “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1788/1996. “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1790/2000. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Critique of Power of Judgment, transl. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804656Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1793/1996a. “Über den Gemeinspruch: das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1793/1996b. “Die Metaphyisik der Sitten.” In Practical Philosophy, transl. M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1798/2006. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Kant: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Of Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, trans. R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, P. 1995. “What Do the Virtuous Hope for? Re-reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good.” In Eight International Kant Congress, edited by H. Robinson, 91–112. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.10.5840/kant199519951Part17Search in Google Scholar

Newton, A. 2017. “Kant on Animal and Human Pleasure.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4): 518–40. ‏https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1261542.Search in Google Scholar

O’Connell, E. 2012. “Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 17 (2): 257–79. ‏https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000052.Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. 1997. “Kant on Reason and Religion.” In Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, edited by G. B. Peterson, 267–308. Utah: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ostaric, L. 2023. The Critique of Judgment and the Unity of Kant’s Critical System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/9781009336833Search in Google Scholar

Pasternack, L. 2017. “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3): 435–68. ‏https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2017.0049.Search in Google Scholar

Reath, A. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4): 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0098.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, S. G. 1984. “Worthiness to Be Happy and Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good.” Kant-Studien 75 (1-4): 168–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1984.75.1-4.168.Search in Google Scholar

Sussman, D. 2015. “The Highest Good : Who Needs it?” In The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, edited by J. Aufderheide, and R. M. Bader, 214–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, J. 2022. Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality‏. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192896032.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Vatansever, S. 2021. “Kant’s Coherent Theory of the Highest Good.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (3): 263–83. ‏https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-020-09782-8.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, E. 2010. “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: Reason, the Unconditioned and the Highest Good.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by A. Reath, and J. Timmermann, 145–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770869.009Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, E. 2014. “Nature in General as a System of Ends.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, edited by E. Watkins, and I. Goy, 117–30. Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110225792.117Search in Google Scholar

Yovel, Y. 1972. “The Highest Good and History in Kant’s Thought.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 54 (3): 238–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.1972.54.3.238.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-08-14
Accepted: 2024-12-15
Published Online: 2025-01-08
Published in Print: 2025-04-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jtph-2024-0019/html
Scroll to top button