Transcendental Arguments and the Sources of Value: Constitutivism as Critical Realism

References

Apel, K.-O. 1973. “Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeischaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik.” In Transformation der Philosophie, Vol. 2, 358–435. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1980. “Notwendigkeit, Schwierigkeit und Möglichkeit einer philosophischen Begründung der Ethik im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft.” In Anatypo apo to aphieroma ston Konstantino Tsatso, edited by P. Kanellopoulos, 215–75. Athens.Suche in Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1988. Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1992. Etica della Comunicazione. Milan: Jaca Book.Suche in Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1998. Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Baiasu, S. 2017. “Constitutivism and Transcendental Practical Philosophy.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 109–40. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-007Suche in Google Scholar

Bambauer, C. 2019. Die praktische Notwendigkeit des Guten. Handlungstheoretische Ethikbegründung in Ausgang von Gewirth und Korsgaard. Paderborn: Mentis.10.30965/9783957437204Suche in Google Scholar

Beyleveld, D. 1991. The Dialectical Necessity of Morality. An Analysis and Defence of Alan Gewirth’s Argument to the Principle of Generic Consistency. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Beyleveld, D. 2015. “Korsgaard V. Gewirth on Universalization: Why Gewirthians Are Kantians and Kantians Ought to Be Gewirthians.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (5): 573–97, https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681026.Suche in Google Scholar

Beyleveld, D. 2017. “Transcendental Arguments for a Categorical Imperative as Arguments from Agential Self-Understanding.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 141–60. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-008Suche in Google Scholar

Brune, J. P., R. Stern, and M. Werner, eds. 2017. Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215Suche in Google Scholar

De Maagt, S. 2017. Constructing Morality. Transcendental Arguments in Ethics. Utrecht: Quaestiones Infinitae, Utrecht University.Suche in Google Scholar

Düwell, M. 2017. “Transcendental Arguments and Practical Self-Understanding. Gewirthian Perspectives.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 161–78. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-009Suche in Google Scholar

Enoch, D. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from what Is Constitutive of Action.” Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169–98, https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-115-2-169.Suche in Google Scholar

Enoch, D. 2011. “Schmagency Revisited.” In New Waves in Metaethics, edited by M. S. Bradey, 208–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230294899_11Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrero, L. 2009. “Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4: 303–33.10.1093/oso/9780199566303.003.0012Suche in Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1984. “Human Dignity as the Basis of Rights.” In The Constitution of Rights, edited by M. J. Meyer, and W. A. Parent, 10–28. New York: Ithaca.10.7591/9781501737213-003Suche in Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1992. Human Rights. Essays on Justification and Application. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. 1998. Self-fulfillment. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400822744Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und Kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Illies, C. 2003. The Grounds of Ethical Judgement. New Transcendental Arguments in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198238324.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Illies, C. 2017. “Neither for Beasts nor for Gods: Why only Morally-Committed Moral Beings can Accept Transcendental Arguments.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 195–210. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-011Suche in Google Scholar

Ilting, K. H. 1982. “Der Geltungsgrund Moralischer Normen.” In Kommunikation und Reflexion, edited by W. Kuhlmann and D. Böhler, 612–48. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Katsafanas, P. 2018. “Constitutivism about Practical Reasons.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity, edited by D. Star, 367–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.17Suche in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 1996a. “Kant’s Formula of Humanity.” In Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 106–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174503.005Suche in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554476Suche in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution. Agency, Identity and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. 2019. “Constitutivism and the Virtues.” Philosophical Explorations 22 (2): 98–116, https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2019.1599050.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, W. 1981. “Reflexive Letztbegründung. Zur These von der Unhintergehbarkeit der Argumentationssituation.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 35 (1): 3–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, W. 1983. Reflexive Letztbegründung. Untersuchungen zur Transzendentalpragmatik. Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, W. 2009. Unhintergehbarkeit. Studien zur Transzendentalpragmatik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Suche in Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1990. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Niquet, M. 1999. Nichthintergehbarkeit und Diskurs. Prolegomena zu einer Diskurstheorie des Transzendentalen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.10.3790/978-3-428-48999-2Suche in Google Scholar

Rähme, P. 2017. “Ambition, Modesty, and Performative Inconsistency.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 25–45. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-003Suche in Google Scholar

Ronzoni, M. forthcoming. “Constitutivism, Constructivism, or Both?” In Constructing Justice, 1–27.Suche in Google Scholar

Schönrich, G. 2017. “Transcendental Arguments in Favour of Absolute Values.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 179–94. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-010Suche in Google Scholar

Steigleder, K. 1999. Grundlegung der normativen Ethik. Der Ansatz von Alan Gewirth. Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Stern, R. 2015. “The Value of Humanity. Reflections on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Argument.” In Kantian Ethics. Value, Agency, and Obligation, 57–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608553.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Stern, R. 2017. “Silencing the Sceptic? The Prospects for Transcendental Arguments in Practical Philosophy.” In Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory, edited by J.P. Brune, R. Stern, and M. Werner, 9–23. New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110470215-002Suche in Google Scholar

Stroud, B. 1968. “Transcendental Arguments.” The Journal of Philosophy 65 (9): 241–56, https://doi.org/10.2307/2024395.Suche in Google Scholar

Tubert, A. 2010. “Constitutive Arguments.” Philosophy Compass 5 (8): 656–66, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00318.x.Suche in Google Scholar