Home Kantian vs. Platonic: The Ambiguity of Schopenhauer’s Notion of Ideas Explained via Its Origins
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kantian vs. Platonic: The Ambiguity of Schopenhauer’s Notion of Ideas Explained via Its Origins

  • Alexander Sattar ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2022

Abstract

The ‘Platonic Ideas’ in Schopenhauer’s metaphysics are (merely) appearances. On the other hand, as the immediate objecthood of the will, they are the essences of species and the only object of true aesthetic cognition, which leads beyond mere appearance. To explain this apparent incongruence, I offer an analysis of Schopenhauer’s early metaphysics (1809–1814), and its transformation into the metaphysics of will, fleshing out the several and divergent concepts of (Platonic) ‘idea’. Specifically, first, as part of his religious and neo-Platonic early philosophy; second, in the context of his ‘true criticism’ in the spirit of Kantian transcendental philosophy; third, as identical to the thing in itself as part of the metaphysics of will, heavily influenced by Kant’s notion(s) of ideas from CR and CJ. Explaining Schopenhauer’s mature notion of Platonic Ideas genetically as a set of homonymic notions helps us better explain its divergent meanings in WWR.


Corresponding author: Alexander Sattar, Institute of Philosophy, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Sandra Shapshay, Alessandro Novembre, and Christopher Janaway for their critical comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

App, U. 2011. Schopenhauers Kompass: Die Geburt einer Philosophie. Rorschach: University Media.Search in Google Scholar

Atwell, J. E. 1995. Schopenhauer on the Character of the World: The Metaphysics of Will. Berkeley, LA; London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520915152Search in Google Scholar

Ciracì, F. 2010. “Il mondo come volontà, idee e rappresentazione: Per una possibile lettura in senso illuministico della dottrina delle idee.” Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 1 (1): 71–115.10.5902/2179378634140Search in Google Scholar

D’Alfonso, M. V. 2006. “Schopenhauer Als Schüler Fichtes.” Fichte-Studien 30: 201–11.10.5840/fichte200630112Search in Google Scholar

Decher, F. 1996. “Das Bessre Bewusstsein: Zur Funktion Eines Begriffs in der Genese der Schopenhauerschen Philosophie.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 77: 65–83.Search in Google Scholar

Dörflinger, B. 1990. “Zur Erkenntnisbedeutung des Ästhetischen. Schopenhauers Beziehung Zu Kant.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 71: 68–77.Search in Google Scholar

Fries, J. F. 1807. Neue Kritik der Vernunft Erster Band Erster Band. Heidelberg: Mohr u. Zimmer.Search in Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. 1999. Schopenhauer. London; New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hübscher, A. 1973. Denker gegen den Strom. Bonn: Bouvier.Search in Google Scholar

Janaway, C. 1996. “Knowledge and Tranquility: Schopenhauer on the Value of Art.” In Schopenhauer, Philosophy and the Arts, edited by Dale Jacquette, 39–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627866.003Search in Google Scholar

Janaway, C. 2004. Self and World in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kamata, Y. 1988. Der junge Schopenhauer: Genese des Grundgedankens der Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Freiburg: K. Alber.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 2008/1790. Critique of the Power of Judgement (P. Guyer, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 2009/1781/1787. Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kossler, M. 2012. “The ‘Perfected System of Criticism’: Schopenhauer’s Initial Disagreements with Kant.” Kantian Review 17 (3): 459–78, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415412000179.Search in Google Scholar

Koßler, M. 2013. “„Ein Kühner Unsinn“ – Anschauung Und Begriff in Schopenhauers Kant-Kritik.” In Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010, edited by M. Ruffing, C. L. Rocca, A. Ferrarin, and S. Bacin, 569–78. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110246490.4429Search in Google Scholar

Koßler, M. 2018. “Schopenhauers früheste philosophische Konzeption.” Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia 9 (1): 11–23.10.5902/2179378633257Search in Google Scholar

Magee, B. 1997. The Philosophy of Schopenhauer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198237227.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. 2017. “How Platonic Are Schopenhauer’s Platonic Ideas?” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by S. Shapshay, 43–63. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-62947-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Novembre, A. 2016a. “Das „Losreißen“ des Wissens: Von der Schopenhauer’schen Nachschrift der Vorlesungen Fichtes „Ueber Die Tatsachen der Bewusstseins“ und „Ueber Die Wissenschaftslehre“.” Zur Ästhetik von Die Welt Als Wille Und Vorstellung 43: 315–35, https://doi.org/10.5840/fichte20164323.Search in Google Scholar

Novembre, A. 2016b. “Die Dissertation 1813 als Einleitung zu einer geplanten „größeren Schrift“ über das „bessre Bewußtseyn.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 97: 133–46.Search in Google Scholar

Novembre, A. 2017. “Platonische Idee und Ding an sich. Der junge Schopenhauer als Leser von Tennemanns Geschichte der Philosophie.” In Per mari inesplorati: Studi in onore di Domenico M. Fazio, 13, edited by S. Apollonio, M. Carparelli, and F. Giordano, 125–139. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.Search in Google Scholar

Novembre, A. 2018. Il giovane Schopenhauer: L’origine della metafisica della volontà. Milano; Udine: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Sattar, A. 2019. ““Some Brought to Us the Truth”: A Source of Schopenhauer’s View of Plato, Philosophy, the “Platonic Ideas” and “Thing in Itself” in W.G. Tennemann’s History of Philosophy.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 100: 87–111.Search in Google Scholar

Sattar, A. 2021a. “Schopenhauers „hermeneutischer“ Metaphysik- und Kritizismus-Begriff vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kant-Rezeption.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (2): 299–325, doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2021.0028.Search in Google Scholar

Sattar, A. 2021b. “„Übung der Vernunft“ und „Übermaß des Intellekts“: Zur Funktion der Wissenschaft als Vorbereitung zur ästhetischen Erkenntnis bei Schopenhauer.” In Philosophie als Wissenschaft, edited by N. Schleich, 243–58. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, A. 1988/1966–68. Manuscript Remains (A. Hübscher, Ed.; E. F. J. Payne, Trans.). Oxford; New York: Berg.Search in Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, A. 2010/1819. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1 (J. Norman, A. Welchman, & C. Janaway, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, A. 2012/1813/1847. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings (D. E. Cartwright, E. E. Erdmann, & C. Janaway, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139025324Search in Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, A. 2018/1844. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 2 (J. Norman, A. Welchman, & C. Janaway, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9780511843112Search in Google Scholar

Segala, M. 2017. “The Path to Redemption Between Better Consciousness and Metaphysics of Will.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 98: 71–98.Search in Google Scholar

Shapshay, S. 2008. “Poetic Intuition and the Bounds of Sense: Metaphor and Metonymy in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy.” European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2): 211–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00308.x.Search in Google Scholar

Shapshay, S. 2019. Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Ethics: Hope, Compassion and Animal Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190906801.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Shapshay, S. 2020. “The Enduring Kantian Presence in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer, edited by R. Wicks, 112–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190660055.013.1Search in Google Scholar

Vandenabeele, B. 2015. The Sublime in Schopenhauer’s Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137358691Search in Google Scholar

Welchman, A. 2017. “Schopenhauer’s Two Metaphysics.” In Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, edited by S. Shapshay, 129–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-62947-6_7Search in Google Scholar

White, F. C. 2011. “Schopenhauer and Platonic Ideas.” In A Companion to Schopenhauer, edited by B. Vandenabeele, 133–46. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781444347579.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Young, J. 2005. Schopenhauer. London; New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-02-21
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jtph-2021-0043/html
Scroll to top button