Clausal versus phrasal comparatives in Latin

References

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Baños Baños, Jose Miguel. 2002. Comparativas con quam y verbo personal en latín. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Suche in Google Scholar

Béguelin, Marie-José, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf. 2010. La parataxe, tomes 1 et 2. Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0352-0039-3Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles. 1914. Syntax of early Latin. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Suche in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1948. Noms d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen. Paris: Maisonneuve.Suche in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, Alessandra & Anna Orlandini. 1996. Quelques aspects de la comparaison en latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 101. 195–232.Suche in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904322793338.Suche in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Shoichi Takahashi. 2007. Direct comparisons: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives. In Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory XVII, 19–36. Ithaca: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v17i0.2958Suche in Google Scholar

Blatt, Franz. 1952. Précis de syntaxe latine (Les langues du monde 8). Lyon: IAC.Suche in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 2014. La Dislocation Droite existe-t-elle en latin? In Alessandro Garcea, Marie-Karine Lhommé & Daniel Vallat (eds.), Polyphonia Romana. Hommages à F. Biville (Spudasmata 155.1), 27–39. Baden-Baden: Olms Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585475219Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 275–343.Suche in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1975. Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1. 25–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Carvalho, Paulo de & Frédéric Lambert (eds.). 2005. Structures parallèles et corrélatives en grec et en latin. Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, septembre 2002. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi-Jonin, Injo (ed.). 2009. Constructions et interprétations des systèmes corrélatifs. Langages 174.10.3917/lang.174.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1995. The theory of principles and parameters. In Noam Chomsky (ed.), The minimalist program, 13–127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2011. Comparatives and superlatives. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax 4. Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 549–66O. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.549Suche in Google Scholar

Danckaert, Lieven. 2024. Voice morphology and the structure of the Latin verb phrase. Article non publié. CNRS & Université de Lille.Suche in Google Scholar

Donati, Caterina. 2000. La Sintassi della Comparazione. Padova: Unipress.Suche in Google Scholar

Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas. 1951. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michèle. 2008. Focalisation des pronoms personnels et des adjectifs possessifs en latin. In Claude Brunet (ed.), Des formes et des mots, 75–89. Besançon: Presses Universitaires.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibert, Guillaume. 2011. La subordination comparative en latin dans les textes de prose de Caton à Apulée. Clermont-Ferrand: Université Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand II doctoral thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, Basil L. & Gonzalez Lodge. 1895. Latin grammar. London: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9(1). 179–191.Suche in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Austin: University of Texas manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Hernández Cabrera, Tomás. 2002. La comparación con quam como criterio de caracterización funcional. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 105–128. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Johan-Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar

Inkova, Olga & Pascale Hadermann. 2013. La corrélation, Aspects syntaxiques et sémantiques. Genève: Droz.Suche in Google Scholar

Ittzés, Máté. 2021. Melle dulcior: Equative or comparative? In Antonio María Martin Rodriguez (ed.), Linguisticae Dissertationes. Current perspectives on Latin grammar, lexicon and pragmatics, 235–248. Madrid: Ediciones Clássicas.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Chris. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Keydana, Götz, Wolfgang Hock & Paul Widmer (eds.). 2021. Comparison and gradation in Indo-European. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110641325Suche in Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, Satzlehre, Zweiter Teil, 2 vols. Hanover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Suche in Google Scholar

Lamberterie, Charles de. 1995. L’apport d’Emile Benveniste. In La comparaison. Faits de langue 5. 13–18.10.3406/flang.1995.972Suche in Google Scholar

Lechner, Winfred. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197402Suche in Google Scholar

Lodge, Gonzales. 1924–1933. Lexicon Plautinum, 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Löfstedt, Einar. 1928. Syntactica. Studien und Beiträge zur Historischen Syntax des Lateins, Erster Teil. Lund: Gleerup.Suche in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 1997. Omission of the direct object in Latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 102. 239–257.Suche in Google Scholar

Madvig, J. R. 1870. Grammaire latine, translation from German of the fourth edition by N. Theil. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Suche in Google Scholar

Matos, Gabriela & Ana Brito. 2008. Comparative clauses and cross linguistic variation: A syntactic approach. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 7, 307–329. Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2001. More of a good thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives. In Jindřic Toman (ed.), Annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting, 2001, 143–161. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9. 134–164. https://doi.org/10.1163/156658409x12500896406005.Suche in Google Scholar

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1973. Arguments linguistiques. Tours: Mame.Suche in Google Scholar

Muller, Claude. 2013. Corrélation et complémentation dans les comparatives du français dans une perspective typologique. In Olga Inkova & Pascale Hadermann (eds.), La corrélation, Aspects syntaxiques et sémantiques, 19–39. Genève: Droz.Suche in Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo. 1983. Comparative ellipsis: A phrase structure analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 675–694.Suche in Google Scholar

Orlandini, Anna & Paolo Poccetti. 2010. À propos des tournures exprimant une comparaison élative (« melle dulcior ») et de leurs évolutions romanes. In Olga Spevak (ed.), Le syntagme nominal en latin. Nouvelles contributions, 183–198. Paris: L’Harmattan.Suche in Google Scholar

Orlandini, Anna & Paolo Poccetti. 2017. Liens de coordination, disjonction et comparaison autour de quam. In Pedro Duarte, Frédérique Fleck, Peggy Lecaudé & Aude Morel-Alizon (eds.), Histoires de mots. Études de linguistique latine et de linguistique générale offertes en hommage à Michèle Fruyt, 235–248. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Suche in Google Scholar

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2005. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In James E. Lavine, Steven Franks, Mila Tasseva Kurkcheva & Hana Filip (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Princeton meeting 2005, 236–257. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2010. More students attended FASL than CONSOLE. In Wayles Browne, Adam Cooper, Alison Fisher, Esra Kesici, Nikola Predolac & Draga Zec (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 18: The Cornell meeting 2009, 383–400. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Philippova, Tatiana. 2017. Ellipsis in the phrasal comparative: Evidence from correlate constraints. In Andrew Lamont & Katerina Tetzloff (eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 47), vol. 3, 1–14. Amherst: University of Massachusetts & GSLA Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. Oxford Latin syntax: Volume 1. The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2021. Oxford Latin syntax: Volume 2. The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1986. On the null object in European Portuguese. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalàn (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110878516-024Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, Norvin. 2013. Lardil “Case stacking” and the timing of Case assignment. Syntax 16. 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00169.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Riemann, Othon. 1908. Syntaxe latine, 5th edn revised by Paul Lejay. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Riemann, Othon & Henri Goelzer. 1929. Grammaire latine complète. Paris: Armand Colin.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine Loqui. Trends and directions in the crystallization of Classical Latin. München: Fink.Suche in Google Scholar

Small, George. 1924. The comparison of inequality: The semantics and syntax of the comparative particle in English. Greifswald: Abel & Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Suche in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2013. La dislocation à droite en latin. Glotta 89. 195–221. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2013.89.14.195.Suche in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 1984. The comparative compared. Journal of Semantics 3. 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/3.1-2.143.Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanelli, Rossana. 1984. Problemi di sintassi indoeuropea: alcune riflessioni sulla comparazione di disuguaglianza. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 24. 187–225.Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez Martínez, Pedro Manuel. 2002. Subordínación o coordinación con quam? In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 229–250. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Suche in Google Scholar

Tarriño, Eusebia. 2011. Comparative clauses. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax 4. Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 373–426. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.373Suche in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esperanza. 2002. Los SN comparativos: El segundo término de la comparación. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 251–279. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Suche in Google Scholar

Traina, Antonio & Tullio Bertotti. 1965. Sintassi normativa della lingua latina, vol. 1. Bologna: Cappelli editore.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Peteghem, Marleen. 2009. Sur le subordonnant comparatif dans les langues romanes. In Injo Choi-Jonin (ed.), Langages, vol. 174, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.174.0099.Suche in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1984. L’apport d’Emile Benveniste à la grammaire comparée. In Guy Serbat (ed.), E. Benveniste aujourd’hui, Actes du Colloque international du CNRS, Université François Rabelais, Tours, 28–30 septembre 1983. Paris: Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Suche in Google Scholar

Woodcock, Eric. 1959. A new Latin syntax. London: Methuen and Co.Suche in Google Scholar