Clausal versus phrasal comparatives in Latin

References

Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Baños Baños, Jose Miguel. 2002. Comparativas con quam y verbo personal en latín. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Béguelin, Marie-José, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf. 2010. La parataxe, tomes 1 et 2. Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0352-0039-3Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles. 1914. Syntax of early Latin. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1948. Noms d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen. Paris: Maisonneuve.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocchi, Alessandra & Anna Orlandini. 1996. Quelques aspects de la comparaison en latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 101. 195–232.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438904322793338.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rajesh & Shoichi Takahashi. 2007. Direct comparisons: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives. In Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory XVII, 19–36. Ithaca: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v17i0.2958Search in Google Scholar

Blatt, Franz. 1952. Précis de syntaxe latine (Les langues du monde 8). Lyon: IAC.Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Bernard. 2014. La Dislocation Droite existe-t-elle en latin? In Alessandro Garcea, Marie-Karine Lhommé & Daniel Vallat (eds.), Polyphonia Romana. Hommages à F. Biville (Spudasmata 155.1), 27–39. Baden-Baden: Olms Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585475219Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 275–343.Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 1975. Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1. 25–74.Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, Paulo de & Frédéric Lambert (eds.). 2005. Structures parallèles et corrélatives en grec et en latin. Actes du colloque de Bordeaux, septembre 2002. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne.Search in Google Scholar

Choi-Jonin, Injo (ed.). 2009. Constructions et interprétations des systèmes corrélatifs. Langages 174.10.3917/lang.174.0003Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1995. The theory of principles and parameters. In Noam Chomsky (ed.), The minimalist program, 13–127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2011. Comparatives and superlatives. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax 4. Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 549–66O. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.549Search in Google Scholar

Danckaert, Lieven. 2024. Voice morphology and the structure of the Latin verb phrase. Article non publié. CNRS & Université de Lille.Search in Google Scholar

Donati, Caterina. 2000. La Sintassi della Comparazione. Padova: Unipress.Search in Google Scholar

Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas. 1951. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michèle. 2008. Focalisation des pronoms personnels et des adjectifs possessifs en latin. In Claude Brunet (ed.), Des formes et des mots, 75–89. Besançon: Presses Universitaires.Search in Google Scholar

Gibert, Guillaume. 2011. La subordination comparative en latin dans les textes de prose de Caton à Apulée. Clermont-Ferrand: Université Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand II doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, Basil L. & Gonzalez Lodge. 1895. Latin grammar. London: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9(1). 179–191.Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Austin: University of Texas manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Hernández Cabrera, Tomás. 2002. La comparación con quam como criterio de caracterización funcional. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 105–128. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Johan-Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Inkova, Olga & Pascale Hadermann. 2013. La corrélation, Aspects syntaxiques et sémantiques. Genève: Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Ittzés, Máté. 2021. Melle dulcior: Equative or comparative? In Antonio María Martin Rodriguez (ed.), Linguisticae Dissertationes. Current perspectives on Latin grammar, lexicon and pragmatics, 235–248. Madrid: Ediciones Clássicas.Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Chris. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Keydana, Götz, Wolfgang Hock & Paul Widmer (eds.). 2021. Comparison and gradation in Indo-European. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110641325Search in Google Scholar

Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, Satzlehre, Zweiter Teil, 2 vols. Hanover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Lamberterie, Charles de. 1995. L’apport d’Emile Benveniste. In La comparaison. Faits de langue 5. 13–18.10.3406/flang.1995.972Search in Google Scholar

Lechner, Winfred. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197402Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, Gonzales. 1924–1933. Lexicon Plautinum, 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Löfstedt, Einar. 1928. Syntactica. Studien und Beiträge zur Historischen Syntax des Lateins, Erster Teil. Lund: Gleerup.Search in Google Scholar

Luraghi, Silvia. 1997. Omission of the direct object in Latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 102. 239–257.Search in Google Scholar

Madvig, J. R. 1870. Grammaire latine, translation from German of the fourth edition by N. Theil. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Search in Google Scholar

Matos, Gabriela & Ana Brito. 2008. Comparative clauses and cross linguistic variation: A syntactic approach. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 7, 307–329. Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2001. More of a good thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives. In Jindřic Toman (ed.), Annual workshop on formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting, 2001, 143–161. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 9. 134–164. https://doi.org/10.1163/156658409x12500896406005.Search in Google Scholar

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1973. Arguments linguistiques. Tours: Mame.Search in Google Scholar

Muller, Claude. 2013. Corrélation et complémentation dans les comparatives du français dans une perspective typologique. In Olga Inkova & Pascale Hadermann (eds.), La corrélation, Aspects syntaxiques et sémantiques, 19–39. Genève: Droz.Search in Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo. 1983. Comparative ellipsis: A phrase structure analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 675–694.Search in Google Scholar

Orlandini, Anna & Paolo Poccetti. 2010. À propos des tournures exprimant une comparaison élative (« melle dulcior ») et de leurs évolutions romanes. In Olga Spevak (ed.), Le syntagme nominal en latin. Nouvelles contributions, 183–198. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Orlandini, Anna & Paolo Poccetti. 2017. Liens de coordination, disjonction et comparaison autour de quam. In Pedro Duarte, Frédérique Fleck, Peggy Lecaudé & Aude Morel-Alizon (eds.), Histoires de mots. Études de linguistique latine et de linguistique générale offertes en hommage à Michèle Fruyt, 235–248. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2005. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In James E. Lavine, Steven Franks, Mila Tasseva Kurkcheva & Hana Filip (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Princeton meeting 2005, 236–257. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2010. More students attended FASL than CONSOLE. In Wayles Browne, Adam Cooper, Alison Fisher, Esra Kesici, Nikola Predolac & Draga Zec (eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 18: The Cornell meeting 2009, 383–400. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Philippova, Tatiana. 2017. Ellipsis in the phrasal comparative: Evidence from correlate constraints. In Andrew Lamont & Katerina Tetzloff (eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 47), vol. 3, 1–14. Amherst: University of Massachusetts & GSLA Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. Oxford Latin syntax: Volume 1. The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2021. Oxford Latin syntax: Volume 2. The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Raposo, Eduardo. 1986. On the null object in European Portuguese. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalàn (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110878516-024Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Norvin. 2013. Lardil “Case stacking” and the timing of Case assignment. Syntax 16. 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00169.x.Search in Google Scholar

Riemann, Othon. 1908. Syntaxe latine, 5th edn revised by Paul Lejay. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Riemann, Othon & Henri Goelzer. 1929. Grammaire latine complète. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine Loqui. Trends and directions in the crystallization of Classical Latin. München: Fink.Search in Google Scholar

Small, George. 1924. The comparison of inequality: The semantics and syntax of the comparative particle in English. Greifswald: Abel & Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2013. La dislocation à droite en latin. Glotta 89. 195–221. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2013.89.14.195.Search in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 1984. The comparative compared. Journal of Semantics 3. 143–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/3.1-2.143.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanelli, Rossana. 1984. Problemi di sintassi indoeuropea: alcune riflessioni sulla comparazione di disuguaglianza. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 24. 187–225.Search in Google Scholar

Suárez Martínez, Pedro Manuel. 2002. Subordínación o coordinación con quam? In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 229–250. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Tarriño, Eusebia. 2011. Comparative clauses. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax 4. Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 373–426. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.373Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, Esperanza. 2002. Los SN comparativos: El segundo término de la comparación. In Empar Espinilla, Père Quetglas & Esperanza Torrego (eds.), La comparación en latin, 251–279. Madrid & Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid/Universidad de Barcelona.Search in Google Scholar

Traina, Antonio & Tullio Bertotti. 1965. Sintassi normativa della lingua latina, vol. 1. Bologna: Cappelli editore.Search in Google Scholar

Van Peteghem, Marleen. 2009. Sur le subordonnant comparatif dans les langues romanes. In Injo Choi-Jonin (ed.), Langages, vol. 174, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.174.0099.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1984. L’apport d’Emile Benveniste à la grammaire comparée. In Guy Serbat (ed.), E. Benveniste aujourd’hui, Actes du Colloque international du CNRS, Université François Rabelais, Tours, 28–30 septembre 1983. Paris: Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Search in Google Scholar

Woodcock, Eric. 1959. A new Latin syntax. London: Methuen and Co.Search in Google Scholar