Habere + pp and the Origin of the Periphrastic Perfect

References

Abney, S. P.1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. [Cambridge, MA]: Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Benveniste, É.1962. Hittite et indo-européen: études comparatives. Paris: Librairie Adrien Maisonneuve.Suche in Google Scholar

Boley, J.1984. The Hittite hark-construction (Vol. 44). Innsbruck: Die Universität.Suche in Google Scholar

Bourciez, É., & Bourciez, J.1967. Elements de linguistique romane. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Brunot, F., & Bruneau, C.1969. Précis de grammaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Masson.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W.1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cennamo, M.2008. The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance. In E.Thórhallur (Ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: the Rosendal papers (pp. 115–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.113.05cenSuche in Google Scholar

Chantraine, P.1927. Histoire du parfait grec (Vol. 21). Paris: Champion.Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, B.1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dahl, Ö.1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

de Acosta, D.2011. Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect. Diachronica, 28(2), 143–185.Suche in Google Scholar

Drinka, B.. 2007. The development of the HAVE perfect: Mutual influences of Greek and Latin. In Aranovich, Raul (Ed.), Split auxiliary systems: a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 101–122). Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.69.06driSuche in Google Scholar

Fleischman, S.1983. From pragmatics to grammar: diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua, 60, 183–214.Suche in Google Scholar

Fruyt, M.2011. Grammaticalization in Latin. In P.Baldi & P.Cuzzolin (Eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax 4: complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology (Vol. Vol. 4, pp. 661–864). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.661Suche in Google Scholar

Happ, H.1967. Die lateinische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus. Glotta, 45(1/2), 60–104. doi:10.2307/40266011Suche in Google Scholar

Harre, C. E.1991. Tener + past participle: a case study in linguistic description. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, A. C., & Campbell, L.1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, M.1982. The ‘past simple’ and ‘present perfect’ in Romance. In N.Vincent & M.Harris (Eds.), Studies in the Romance verb: essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 42–70). London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B., & Szantyr, A.1972. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (2. ed. Vol. 2). München: C. H. Beck.Suche in Google Scholar

La Fauci, N.1988. Oggetti e soggetti nella fomazione della morfosintassi romanza. Pisa: Giardini.Suche in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, M.1995. Grammaticalizzazione delle peripfrasi verbali perfettive romanze e accordo del participio passato. Archivio glottologico italiano, 80(1-2), 144–167.Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer-Lübke, W.1974. Grammaire des langues romanes (A. Doutrepont & G. Doutrepont, Trans. Vol. III, Syntaxe). Genève: Slatkine reprints.Suche in Google Scholar

Nuti, A.2005. A few remarks on the habeo + object + passive perfect participle construction in Archaic Latin, with special reference to lexical semantics and the reanalysis process. In G.Calboli (Ed.), Papers on grammar IX.1, Latina lingua! Proceedings of the twelfth international colloquium on Latin linguistics (Bologna, 9–14 June 2003) (pp. 392–404). Roma: Herder.10.1515/joll.2005.9.1.393Suche in Google Scholar

Olbertz, H.1998. Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110820881Suche in Google Scholar

Pinkster, H.1987. The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In M.Harris & P.Ramat (Eds.), The historical development of auxiliaries (pp. 193–223). Berlin: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Pulgram, E.1978. Latin-Romance habere: Double function and lexical split. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 94, 1–8.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramat, P.1982. Ein Beispiel von ‘Reanalysis’, typologisch betrachtet Folia Linguistica (Vol. 16, pp. 365).10.1515/flin.1982.16.1-4.365Suche in Google Scholar

Ramat, P.1984. Linguistica tipologica. Bologna: Mulino.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramat, P.1987. Introductory paper. In M.Harris & P.Ramat (Eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries (pp. 3–19). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Rohlfs, G.1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti (Vol. 3, Sintassi e formazione delle parole). Torino: Einaudi.Suche in Google Scholar

Salvi, G.1987. Syntactic restructuring in the evolution of Romance auxiliaries. In M.Harris & P.Ramat (Eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries (pp. 225–236). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwarze, C.2001. Representation and variation: on the development of Romance auxiliary syntax. In M.Butt & T. H.King (Eds.), Time over matter: diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax (pp. 143–172). Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Seifert, E.1930. “Haber” y “tener” como expresiones de la posesión en español. Revista de filología española, 17(3-4), 233-276, 345-389.Suche in Google Scholar

Thielmann, P.1885. Habere mit dem Partizip Perfekt Passiv. Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik, 2, 372-423; 509–549.Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.2005. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vincent, N.1982. The developent of the auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance. In N.Vincent & M.Harris (Eds.), Studies in the Romance verb: essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 71–96). London: Croom Helm.Suche in Google Scholar

Woytek, E.1970. Sprachliche Studien zur Satura Menippea Varros. Wien.Suche in Google Scholar