The Grammaticalization of Latin nē + Subjunctive Constructions

References

Allen, J. H. and Greenough, J.B.1903. Allen and Greenough’s New Latin Grammar. Boston: Ginn & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Andrew Runni and Greenough, J.B.. 1914. The Unity of the Enclitic ne. Classical Philology, 9(2), 174–188.Search in Google Scholar

Beekes, R. S. P.1995. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.72Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles, E.1907. The Latin Language: A Historical Outline of its Sounds, Inflections, and Syntax. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Boley, Jacqueline. 2004. “Historical Basis of PIE Syntax - Hittite Evidence and Beyond, Part Two: The Particles”, Indogermanische Forschungen, 109, 140–182.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1998. “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics, 40, 257–271Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 1966. “I Modi del Verbo Greco e Latino 1903-1966”, Lustrum, 11, 173–349.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 1968. “I Modi del Verbo Greco e Latino 1903-1966”, Lustrum, 13, 405–511.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 2001. “Verbal Moods in Latin Juridical Language”. In M.Gotti, and M.Dossena (Eds.), Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference. Bern-Berlin etc.: Lang. 53–70.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 2011. “Die Modi des griechischen und lateinischen Verbums 1966-2010”, Lustrum, 53, 9–150.Search in Google Scholar

Calboli, Gualtiero. 2012. “Die Modi des griechischen und lateinischen Verbums 1966-2010”, Lustrum, 54, 7–207.Search in Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1923. Cato Maior de Senectute., (W. A. Falconer, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_senectute.1923Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808616Search in Google Scholar

Courtney, Edward. 1999. Archaic Latin Prose. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2012. “Descriptive Notions vs. Grammatical Categories: Unrealized States of Affairs and ‘Irrealis”, Language Sciences34, 131–146.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Curme, George, O.1929. “The Forms and Functions of the Subjunctive in the Classical and –Modern Languages”, Modern Philology, 26(4), 387–399.Search in Google Scholar

de Haan, Ferdinand. 2012. Irrealis: fact or fiction?Language Sciences, 34, 107–130.Search in Google Scholar

de Vann, Michiel. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages, Leiden: Brill Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Elmer, H. C.1894. “The Latin Prohibitive, Part II”, The American Journal of Philology, 15: 3, 299–328.Search in Google Scholar

Exon, Charles. 1922. “The Function of the Latin Subjunctive”, Hermathena, 19(43), 249–272.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1995. “Functional Theory of Complementizers”. In (eds.) Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne.Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 473–502.Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michèle. 2011. “Grammaticalization in Latin”. In (eds.) Baldi, Philip and Cuzzolin, Pierluigi.New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 4: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110253412.661Search in Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, Basil, L. and Lodge, Gonzalez. 2009. Gildersleeve’s Latin Grammar. Mineola, NY: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Giora, Rachel, Fien, Ofer, Metuiki, Nili, and Stern, Pnina. 2010. “Negation as a Metaphor- Inducing Operator”. In Horn, Laurence R. (Ed.) The Expression of Negation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., 225–256.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy2001. Syntax: An introduction, v. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar

Glare, P. G. W. (ed.) 1982. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, William, W.1900. A Greek Grammar, Boston: Ginn and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Gonda, Jan. 1956. The Character of Indo-European Moods with special regard to Greek and Sanskrit, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Arthur E. 1975. Notes on the Duenos-Vase Inscription in BerlinCalifornia Studies in Classical Antiquity, 8, 53–72.Search in Google Scholar

Greenough, Joseph, B.1870. Analysis of the Latin Subjunctive, Cambridge: John Wilson and Son.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, William Gardner, and Buck, Carl, Darling. 1903. A Latin Grammar, Boston: Ginn & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Hamp, Eric P.1982. “Latin ut/nē and ut (…nōn)”, Glotta, 60, 115–120.Search in Google Scholar

Handford, S. A.1947. The Latin Subjunctive: Its Usage and Development from Plautus to Tacitus, London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1995. “Agent-oriented vs. Epistemic Modality”. In (eds.) Bybee, Joan and Fleischman, Suzanne.Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 473–502.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffner, Harry, A. and Melchert, H.Craig. 2008. AGrammar of the Hittite Language, Part 1: Reference Grammar. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.10.5325/j.ctv240djsfSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth, Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence, R.2001. A Natural History of Negation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Language. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo, and VsevolodKapatsinski. (2012). “The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian”, Journal of Pragmatics44, 346–373.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.009Search in Google Scholar

Justus, Carol, F.1980. “Typological Symmetries and Asymmetries in Hittite and IE Complementation”. In Ramat, Paolo (Ed.), Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax. Proceedings of the Colloquium of the ‘Indogermanische Gesellschaft’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183–206.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Tense and Mood in Indo-European Syntax. Foundations of Language, 4, 30–57.Search in Google Scholar

Lakey, Holly. 2013. Morphosyntax of Fear and Distance. Indo-European Linguistics, 1, 131–158.Search in Google Scholar

Langslow, David. (Ed.), 2009. Jacob Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax: With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198153023.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred Philipp. 1974. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Charlton T. and Short, Charles. 1987. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mathiassen, Terje. 1996. A Short Grammar of Lithuanian. Columbus: Slavica.Search in Google Scholar

Meier-Brügger, Michael. 1992. Griechische Sprachwissenschaft, 2 vols, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Meier-Brügger, Michael. 2003Indo-European Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter10.1515/9783110895148Search in Google Scholar

Molinelli, Piera. 1998. “The Evolution of Subjunctive (Mood and Tenses) in Subordinate Clauses from Latin to Romance”. In (ed.) García-Hernández, Benjamín. Estudios de Lingüística Latina: Actas del IX Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Latina, Universidada Autonóna de Nadrudm 14-18 de Abril de 1997, v. 1. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas. 555–570.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, E. P.1901. On Principles and Methods in Latin Syntax. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Morwood, James. 1999. A Latin Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Müller-Wetzel, Martin. 2001. Der lateinische Konjunktiv. Seine Einheit als deiktische Kategorie. Eine Erklärung der modalen Systeme der klassischen Zeit. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, F. R.1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, L. R.1954. The Latin Language. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. Trans. by HotzeMulder.London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pliny the Younger. 1900. Epistulae. (J. B. Firth, Trans., with an introductory essay). London: Walter Scott.Search in Google Scholar

Roby, Henry, John. 1896. A Grammar of the Latin Language from Plautus to Suetonius. London: MacMillan and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Roby, Henry, John. 2010 [1875]. A Grammar of the Latin Language from Plautus to Suetonius, Volume 2. London: MacMillan and Co.10.1017/CBO9780511697463Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John, R.1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert, Weir. 1920. A Greek Grammar for Colleges. New York: American Book Co.Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenschein, Edward, A. 1910. The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Strunk, Klaus. 1988. “Zur diachronischen Morphosyntax des Konjunktivs”. In (eds.) Rijksbaron, A., Mulder, H.A., and Wakker, G.C.In the Footsteps of Raphael Kühner: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in Commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of the Publication of Raphael Kühner’s Ausführliche Grammatik Der Grieschischen Sprache, II. Theil: Syntax.Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben, 291–312.Search in Google Scholar

Szemerényi, Oswald, J. L.1996. Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torrego, M.Esperanza. 1986. “The System of Substantive Clauses as Complement in Classical Latin”, Glotta, 64, 66–83.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization In (eds.) Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–271.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth, Closs. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language, 65. 31–55.10.2307/414841Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth, Closs. 1995. “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. In Stein, Dieter, and Wright, Susan (Eds,),. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–54.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth, Closs. and Dasher, Richard B.2004. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth, Closs.2010. “Revisiting Subjectification and Intersubjectification”. In Davidse, Kristin and Vandelanotte, Lieven (Eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 29–70.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. “Prohibition: Constructions and Markers”. In Shu, Dingfang and Turner, Ken (Eds.), Contrasting Meaning in Languages of the East and West. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 443–475.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2006. “Why Languages Prefer Prohibitives”, Journal of Foreign Languages, 1(1), 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, & Lejeune, Ludo (with Goussev, Valentin). 2011. “The Prohibitive”, In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (Eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 71. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/71. Accessed on 2013-08-14.Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Milton. 1881. “On the Enclitic ne in Early Latin”, The American Journal of Philology, 2(5), 50–82.Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William, D.1913. A Sanskrit Grammar: Including both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana, 4th Edition. Boston: Ginn and Company.Search in Google Scholar