Verb repetition as a template for reactive tokens in Japanese everyday talk

References

Altenberg, Bengt. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications, 101–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Aoki, Hirofumi. 2009. Dooshi choofuku koobun no rekishi [The history of verb reduplication constructions]. Nihongo no kenkyu [Studies in the Japanese Language] 5(2). 1–15.Suche in Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate & Margaret Florey. 2002. ‘Yeah-no he’s a good kid’: A discourse analysis of yeah-no in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22(2). 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/0726860022000013166.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Suche in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 2000. Florescence as a force in grammaticalization. In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, 39–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.43.03chaSuche in Google Scholar

Clancy, Patricia M., Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki & Hongyin Tao. 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in Japanese, Mandarin, and English. Journal of Pragmatics 26(1). 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Corrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.). 2009. Formulaic language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.82Suche in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17(4). 513–552. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.02cou.Suche in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20(1). 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1979. On fluency. In Charles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler & William S. Y. Wang (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, 85–102. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50012-3Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531.Suche in Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Golato, Andrea & Zsuzsanna Fagyal. 2008. Comparing single and double sayings of the German response token ja and the role of prosody: A conversation analytic perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41. 3241–3270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802237834.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent, 22–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080.22Suche in Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1997. The Northridge earthquake conversations: the floor structure and the ‘loop’ sequence in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28(6). 661–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00070-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Kashino, Wakako. 2020. “Nihongo nichijoukaiwa koopasu” monitaa kookaiban ni mirareru kandooshi igai no ootoo hyoogen [Variety of responsive representations other than interjections observed in the monitor version of the corpus of everyday Japanese conversation]. Gengo Shigen Katsuyoo Waakushoppu Happyoo Ronbunshuu [Proceedings of Language Resources Workshop] 5. 331–347.Suche in Google Scholar

Koiso, Hanae, Haruka Amatani, Yuriko Iseki, Yasuyuki Usuda, Wakako Kashino, Yoshiko Kawabata, Yayoi Tanaka, Yasuharu Den & Ken’ya Nishikawa. 2020. “Nihongo nichijyoukaiwa koopasu” monitaaban no sekkei, hyooka, yobiteki bunseki [Design, evaluation, and preliminary analysis of the monitor version of the corpus of everyday Japanese conversation]. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo Ronshu [NINJAL Research Papers] 18. 17–33.Suche in Google Scholar

Maynard, Senko. 1986. On back-channel behavior in Japanese and English casual conversation. Linguistics 24(6). 1079–1108. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.6.1079.Suche in Google Scholar

Nakayama, Toshihide & Fumino Horiuchi. 2020. Demystifying the development of a structurally marginal pattern: A case study of the wa-initiated responsive construction in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 172. 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Oe, Motoki. 2019a. Keiyooshi kihonkei hanpukubun no danwateki, toogoteki tokuchoo [Discourse and syntactic features of repetition sentences with adjective root form]. Nihongo no Kenkyu [Studies in the Japanese Language] 15(2). 52–68.Suche in Google Scholar

Oe, Motoki. 2019b. Nihongo ni okeru ‘kurikaeshi’ no kaikubun no kentoo [Consideration on subdivisions of iteration in Japanese]. Kanazawadaigaku Rekishigengobunkagakukei Ronshuu [Studies and Essays: Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters, Kanazawa University] 11. 67–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Ohama, Ruiko. 2006. Nihongokaiwa ni okeru taankoutai to aizuchi ni kansuru kenkyu [A study of turn-taking and backchannels in Japanese conversation]. Hiroshima: Keisuisha.Suche in Google Scholar

Omura, Mai, Wakako Kashino & Makoto Yamazaki. 2020. Nihongo Nichijokaiwa Koopasu Monitaa Kookaiban no Goi [Vocabulary of the monitor version of the corpus of everyday Japanese conversation]. Nichijokaiwa Koopasu Purojekuto Hookokusho 4 [Corpus of everyday Japanese conversation project report 4]. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics].Suche in Google Scholar

Ono, Tsuyoshi & Ryoko Suzuki. 2018. The use of frequent verbs as reactive tokens in Japanese everyday talk: Formulaicity, florescence, and grammaticization. Journal of Pragmatics 123. 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–225. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2001. Conversation Analysis: A project in process – “Increments”. Santa Barbara: Forum lecture delivered at the LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California.Suche in Google Scholar

Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2005. On the grammaticalization of verbal reduplication in Japanese. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 283–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110911466.283Suche in Google Scholar

Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2009. Semantic constraints on the diachronic productivity of Japanese reduplication. Grazer Linguistische Studien 71. 79–97.Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2). 260–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 1990. The role of particles in Japanese gossip. BLS 16. 315–324. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v16i0.1723.Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 2016. Kaiwa ni okeru dooshi yurai no han’nohyogen: Aru to iru o chuushin ni [Reactive expressions of verb origins in conversation: With special focus on existentials aru and iru]. In Yoko Fujii & Hiroko Takanashi (eds.), Komyunikeeshon no Dainamizumu [Dynamics in Communication: Analysis of Natural Discourse], 63–83. Tokyo: Hituzi-shobo.Suche in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Keiko & Yuko Higashiizumi. 2020. Koopasu ni miru kango ‘muri’ no rekishi [The history of Sino-Japanese muri ‘no reason’ through the corpora]. In Gengoshigen katsuyo waakushoppu 2020 Happyo ronbunshu [Proceedings of Language Resources Workshop 2020]. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo [National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics]. Avaliable at: https://repository.ninjal.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=3176&file_id=48&file_no=1.Suche in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Keiko & Yuko Higashiizumi. 2021. Goyooronteki hyooshiki toshiteno kango ‘muri’ no rekishi [The history of the Sino-Japanese compound muri ‘no reason’ as a pragmatic marker in Japanese]. Toyo Daigaku Ningen Kagaku Sougoukenkyujo Kiyou [The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences, Toyo University] 23. 53–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity. Text 7(3). 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.215.Suche in Google Scholar

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. A usage-based approach to argument structure: ‘Remember’ and ‘Forget’ in spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(1). 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.1.04tao.Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, Allison. 2008. Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, Akiho. 2004. Nihongo no ronri [The logic of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Suche in Google Scholar