Home Formulaicity and contexts: a multimodal analysis of the Japanese utterance-final tteyuu
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Formulaicity and contexts: a multimodal analysis of the Japanese utterance-final tteyuu

  • Michiko Kaneyasu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 4, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study investigates the use of the utterance-final tteyuu [ʔtejɯː], a combination of the quotative particle tte and the verb yuu (‘say’). Although its lexicalized status and utterance-final occurrence are commonly observed, we still know little about its real-time functions. The analysis of 120 examples in varied contexts shows its general usage to clarify something expressed in the prior talk, which is a type of repair practice. More importantly, the analysis reveals how the participants’ understanding of the ongoing speech activity and multimodal cues affect its use and interpretation. Furthermore, some specialized usages appear to motivate activity-bound pragmatic inferencing, leading to emergence of a new construction. The findings demonstrate that even those expressions that are fixed in one context are in flux; their functions and structures are always subject to negotiation and change through frequent use in new contexts. The study contributes to the understanding of a dynamic interplay between linguistic formulaicity and contextual factors.


Corresponding author: Michiko Kaneyasu, Old Dominion University, 4001 Batten Arts & Letters, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank the editors of this special issue and the members of the Formulaicity in Everyday Interaction Research Project for discussions and feedback during the progress of this research. I would also like to thank the participants of the East Asian Linguistics Workshop at Stanford University and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

References

Auer, Peter. 1996. From context to contextualization. Links and Letters 3. 11–28.Search in Google Scholar

Canavan, Alexandra & George Zipperlen. 1996. CALLHOME Japanese speech. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift? Journal of Pragmatics 60. 89–102.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking context: An introduction. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 1998. The knowing ear: An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition, Arbeitspapier Nr. 32 (Neue Folge). Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society 12. 153–172.10.1017/S0047404500009787Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Makoto. 1997. An exploration of sentence-final uses of the quotative particle in Japanese spoken discourse. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6. 565–581.Search in Google Scholar

Hoymann, Gertie. 2016. Asking in freedom: Questioning and requesting in ǂĀkhoe Haiǀǀom. Nijmegen, ms: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2020. The non-predicative copula construction: A multiple-grammar perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 170. 426–444.10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kaneyasu, Michiko. 2019. The family of Japanese no-wa cleft construction: A register-based analysis. Lingua 217. 1–23.10.1016/j.lingua.2018.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Koda, Naomi. 2013. Mēshi-shūshoku-setsu niyoru katari no shūketsu: mitaina, tteiu no hyōgensei to danwakinō [Story closure via noun-modifying clauses: Meaning and discourse functions of mitaina and tteiu]. In Kazuhiro Kodama & Tetsuharu Koyama (eds.), Gengo no sōhatsu to shintaisei [Emergence and Embodiment of Language], 431–447. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Contextualizing “contextualization cues”. In Susan Eerdmans, Carlo Prevignano & Paul Thibault (eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, 31–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.117.04levSearch in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame-semantic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.35Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 2015. Partnership between grammatical construction and interactional frame: The stand-alone noun-modifying construction in invocatory discourse. Constructions and Frames 7(2). 289–314.10.1075/cf.7.2.05matSearch in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1). 69–119.10.1353/lan.2008.0054Search in Google Scholar

Miyata, Susanne, Kyoko Banno, Saya Konishi, Ayumi Matsui, Shiori Matsumoto, Rie Ooki, Akane Takahashi & Kyoko Muraki. 2009. Japanese Sakura corpus. Pittsburgh, PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-429-X.Search in Google Scholar

Nakayama, Toshihide & Fumino Horiuchi. 2020. Demystifying the development of a structurally marginal pattern: A case study of the wa-initiated responsive construction in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 170. 215–224.10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.018Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1979. What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics, 1–20. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ohori, Toshio. 1996. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on semantics and pragmatics, 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.32.11ohoSearch in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shigeko. 1996. Pragmaticization of meaning in some sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in semantics and pragmatics: In honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 219–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.32.12okaSearch in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shigeko & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2008. Quotative ‘tte’ in Japanese: Its multifaceted functions and degrees of “subordination.” In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 205–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.80.10okaSearch in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1986. Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics 15. 127–138.10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7Search in Google Scholar

Sadanobu, Toshiyuki. 2019. Watashi no chotto omoshiroi hanashi kontesuto [My Funny Short Stories Corpus] (2010–2019). Available at: https://www.speech-data.jp/chotto/history.html.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Body torque. Social Research 65(3). 535–596.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611841Search in Google Scholar

Steensig, Jakob & Tine Larsen. 2008. Affiliative and disaffiliative uses of you say x questions. Discourse Studies 10(1). 113–132.10.1177/1461445607085593Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 2007. (Inter)subjectification in the quotative tte in Japanese conversation: Local change, utterance-ness and verb-ness. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8(2). 207–237.10.1075/jhp.8.2.04suzSearch in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Satoko. 1995. A study of the sentence-final mitai na. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 29(2). 55–78.10.2307/489589Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (ed.). 1993 Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah & Cynthia Wallat. 1987. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2). 205–216.10.2307/2786752Search in Google Scholar

Tonami, Hidetaka (dir). 2020. Towazugatari no Kanda Hakuzan [Radio program]. Tokyo: TBS Radio.Search in Google Scholar

Usami, Mayumi (ed.). 2018. BTSJ-Japanese Natural Conversation Corpus with Transcripts and Recordings, NINJAL institute-based projects: Multiple approaches to analyzing the communication of Japanese language learners, leader: Mayumi Usami.Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Mari. 2014. Monogatari no ukete niyoru serifu hatsuwa: sanyoshakan no kyōkan kankei no kōchiku ni kansuru kaiwabunseki-teki kenkyū [Hypotherical ‘serifu’ utterances by story recipients: Conversation analytic research on the affiliative relationship building during storytelling]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Hokkaido University.Search in Google Scholar

Yokomori, Daisuke. 2019. When to withhold a reference to a head noun: A study of turn-final use of the complementizer toiu/tteyuu in Japanese conversation [conference presentation slides]. International Pragmatics Association 2019 Conference.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-22
Accepted: 2022-03-17
Published Online: 2023-05-04
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2023-2004/html
Scroll to top button