Sequential positions and interactional functions of negative epistemic constructions in Japanese conversation

References

Beach, Wayne A. & Terri R. Metzger. 1997. Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research 23(4). 562–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Joan Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37. 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.575.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Harbert. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2013. Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fox, Barbara, Sandra A. Thompson, Cecilia E. Ford & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2012. Conversation analysis and linguistics. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 726–740. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch36Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. Language 54(4). 787–815. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. Giving support to the claim of epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.004Suche in Google Scholar

Hayano, Kaoru. 2012. Question design in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 395–414. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch19Suche in Google Scholar

Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke & Arnulf Deppermann. 2016. A range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German: ICH WEISS NICHT as a resource for dispreferred actions. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012a. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012b. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.Suche in Google Scholar

Joh, Ayami, Mayumi Bono & Katsuya Takanashi. 2015. Kagakukan niokeru “taiwa” no koochiku: soogokooi bunseki kara mita “shitteru?” no shiyoo [construction of “dialogue” in science museum: The use of shitteru? ‘Do you know?’ from the perspective of interaction analysis]. Cognitive Studies 22(1). 69–83.Suche in Google Scholar

Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territories of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar

Kato, Yukiko. 2002. “Chigai ga wakaru otoko” wa donna otoko ka [What kind of person is someone who is called “chigai ga wakaru otoko”]. Bulletin of the International Student Center Gifu University. 97–109.Suche in Google Scholar

Keevallik, Leelo. 2016. Abandoning dead ends: The Estonian junction marker maitea ‘I don’t know’. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Koiso, Hanae, Yasuharu Den, Yuriko Iseki, Wakako Kashino, Yoshiko Kawabata, Ken’ya Nishikawa, Yayoi Tanaka & Yasuyuki Usuda. 2018. Construction of the Corpus of Everyday Japanese conversation: An interim report. In Proceedings of LREC2018, 4259–4264.Suche in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2016. Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Kiri. 2006. Territory of information theory and emotive expressions in Japanese: A case observed in shiranai and wakaranai. In Satoko Suzuki (ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese, 191–207. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.151.10leeSuche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2012. Action formation and ascription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 103–130. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch6Suche in Google Scholar

Lindström, Jan & Susanna Karlsson. 2016. Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 129–147.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2016. A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 72–79.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Liyan. 2006. Huayu biaoji “ni zhidao” [Discourse marker ni zhidao]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 5. 423–432.Suche in Google Scholar

Matsugu, Yuka. 2005. Japanese epistemic sentence-final particle kana: Its function as a ‘mitigation marker’ in discourse data. Pragmatics 15(4). 423–436.10.1075/prag.15.4.02matSuche in Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2016. More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequence organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.014.Suche in Google Scholar

Polak-Yitshaki, Hilla & Yael Maschler. 2016. Disclaiming understanding? Hebrew ‘ani lo mevin/a’ (‘I don’t understand’) in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106. 163–183.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.013Suche in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008Suche in Google Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey & John Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owing grandchildren. Language in Society 35. 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404506060325.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Sadler, Misumi. 2010. Subjective and intersubjective uses of Japanese verbs of cognition in conversation. Pragmatics 20(1). 109–128.10.1075/prag.20.1.06sadSuche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002Suche in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002Suche in Google Scholar

Tao, Hongyin. 2003. Cong yuyin, yufa he huayu tezheng kan “zhidao” geshi zai tanhua zhong de yeanhua. [Phonological, Grammatical, and Discourse Evidence for the Emergence of Zhidao (to know) Constructions in Mandarin Conversation]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 2003.4(295). 291–302 (Reprinted in Xu Jie and Zhong Qi, eds., Interface in Chinese: Phonetics, Morphology, and Syntax. Beijing Language and Culture University Press. 425–445. 2007).Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1). 125–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139381154Suche in Google Scholar

Vatanen, Anna. 2018. Resisting an action in conversation by pointing out epistemic incongruence: Mätiedän ‘I know’ responses in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 123. 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Yokomori, Daisuke & Tomoko Endo. 2022. Projective/retrospective linking of a contrastive idea: Interactional practices of turn-initial and turn-final uses of kedo ‘but’ in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 196. 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.017.Suche in Google Scholar