Formulaicity and formulaic expressions in Japanese: an introduction

References

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Corrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds.). 2009. Formulaic language, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.82Suche in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2003. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol. 2, 47–88. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 2007. The notion of “context” in language education. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education. Volume 9 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 269–290. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Haselow, Alexander. 2017. Spontaneous spoken English: An integrated approach to the emergent grammar of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108265089Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2021. The rise of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108982856Suche in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2019. Construction Grammar and application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474433624Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent, 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110229080.22Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2012. Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190512000037.Suche in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin Rpt. 1992. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, with a new introduction and index by James D. McCawley.Suche in Google Scholar

Kabata, Kaori & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds.). 2014. Usage-based approaches to Japanese grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.156Suche in Google Scholar

Knappe, Gabriele. 2004. Idioms and fixed expressions in English language study before 1800: A contribution to English historical phraseology. Berlin: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Knappe, Gabriele. 2017. Idioms and fixed expressions. In Laurel J. Brinton & Bergs Alexander (eds.), The history of English: Historical outlines from sound to text, 140–164. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110525281-008Suche in Google Scholar

Laury, Ritva & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds.). 2020. Fixed expressions: Building language structure and social action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.315Suche in Google Scholar

Miyano, Naoki. 2015. Kenkyū o Fukameru Itutu no Toi [Five questions to foster research]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Suche in Google Scholar

Nihongogakkai (ed.). 2018. Nihongogaku Daijiten [The encyclopedia of Japanese linguistics]. Tokyo: Tokyodoshuppan.Suche in Google Scholar

Ono, Tsuyoshi & Ryoko Suzuki. 2018. The use of frequent verbs as reactive tokens in Japanese everyday talk: Formulaicity, florescence, and grammaticization. Journal of Pragmatics 123. 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Östman, Jan-Ola. 2003. Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 121–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.3.06ostSuche in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 2007. Developments in the study of formulaic language since 1970: A personal view. In Paul Skandera (ed.), Phraseology and culture in English, 3–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197860.3Suche in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–227. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Piirainen, Elisabeth, Natalia Filatkina, Sören Stumpf & Christian Pfeiffer (eds.). 2020. Formulaic language and new data: Theoretical and methodological implications. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110669824Suche in Google Scholar

Rhee, Seongha, Reijirou Shibasaki & Xinren Chen (eds.). 2021. Grammaticalization of discourse markers in East Asian languages. Special issue of East Asian Pragmatics 6(3). Sheffield: Equinox.10.1558/eap.21135Suche in Google Scholar

Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2018a. Sequentiality and the emergence of new constructions: That’s the bottom line is (that) in American English. In Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Leisbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe (eds.), Explorations in English historical syntax, 283–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.198.12shiSuche in Google Scholar

Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2018b. From the inside to the outside of the sentence: Forming a larger discourse unit with jijitsu ‘fact’ in Japanese. In Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & Jose Vincente Lozano (eds.), New trends in grammaticalization and language change, 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.202.14shiSuche in Google Scholar

Skandera, Paul (ed.). 2007. Phraseology and culture in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197860Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 2016. Kaiwa ni okeru dōshi yurai no hannō hyōgen: Aru to iru o tyūshin ni [Reactive expressions of verb origins in conversation: with special focus on existentials aru and iru]. In Yoko Fujii & Hiroko Takanashi (eds.), Komyunikēsyon no Dainamizumu [Dynamics in communication: Analysis of natural discourse], 63–83. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Suche in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2019. Ninchi keitairon [Cognitive morphology]. In Yukio Tsuji (ed.), Ninchigengogaku Daijiten [A comprehensive dictionary of Cognitive Linguistics]. Tokyo: Asakura-shoten.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139381154Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2019. Constructional pattern-development in language change. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept, 125–155. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110596656-006Suche in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Takuto & Reijirou Shibasaki (eds.). forthcoming [2023]. Eigosi ni okeru teikei hyōgen to teikeisei [Formulaic expressions and formulaicity in the history of English]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Suche in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2009. Identifying formulaic language: Persistent challenges and new opportunities. In Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds.), Formulaic language, volume 1: Distribution and historical change, 27–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.82.02ideSuche in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2013. Research timeline: Formulaic language. Language Teaching 46(3). 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444813000013.Suche in Google Scholar

Yamane, Chie, Tomoko Sato & Keiko Okumura (eds.). 2020. Kenkyusha Nihongo Kōgo Hyōgen Jiten [Kenkyusha’s dictionary of Japanese colloquial expressions], 2nd edn. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Suche in Google Scholar