A formal approach to role language: sentence-final particles and the speaker-hearer link

References

Abraham, Werner. 1995. Wieso stehen nicht alle Modalpartikel in allen Satzformen? Die Nullhypothese. Deutsche Sprache 23. 124–146.Suche in Google Scholar

Aelbrecht, Lobke, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye. 2012. Main clause phenomena and the privilege of the root. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.01ael.Suche in Google Scholar

Alm, Maria, Janina Behr & Kerstin Fischer. 2018. Modal particles and sentence type restrictions: A construction grammar perspective. Glossa 3(1). 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.702.Suche in Google Scholar

Brody, Michael. 1997. Perfect chains. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 139–167. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_3.Suche in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna. 2015. Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective. In Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented Syntax, 71–91. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.04car.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.001.0001.Suche in Google Scholar

Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18. 91–129.Suche in Google Scholar

Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean. 2012. Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.10con.Suche in Google Scholar

Dohi, Atsushi. 2020. CP-internal discourse particles and the split ForceP hypothesis. Lingua 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102757.Suche in Google Scholar

Egg, Markus & Johannes Mursell. 2016. The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds.), Discourse Particles, 15–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110497151-002.Suche in Google Scholar

Endo, Yoshio. 2010. Shūjoshi no cartography [cartography of final particles]. In Nobuko Hasegawa (ed.), Tōgoron no shintenkai to nihongo kenkyū: meidai wo koete [New development of syntax and study of the Japanese language: Beyond proposition], 67–94. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Suche in Google Scholar

Endo, Yoshio. 2014. An overview of the cartography of syntactic structures in Japanese. In Cardinaletti Anna, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds.), On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, 9–28. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Suche in Google Scholar

Endo, Yoshio & Liliane Haegeman. 2014. Adverbial concord: Mergin adverbial clauses. Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics. 25–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Endo, Yoshio & Liliane Haegeman. 2019. Adverbial clauses and adverbial concord. Glossa 4(1). 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.589.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2. 117–180.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2010. The syntacticization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Robert Truswell & Christina Sevdali (eds.), Syntax and its Limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2011. The syntacticization of discourse. Ms: Ghent University and University of New Brunswick-SJ.Suche in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2014. Vocatives and speech act projections: A case study in West Flemish. In Cardinaletti Anna, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds.), On peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, 209–236. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Suche in Google Scholar

Hill, Virginia. 2007. Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua 117(12). 2077–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko & Megumi Yoshida. 1999. Sociolinguistics: Honorifics and gender differences. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 444–480. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.10.1002/9781405166225.ch16Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 2000. Yakuwarigo tankyū no teian [A proposal for exploring role language]. In Kiyoji Sato (ed.), Kokugo Ronkyū [Inquiries into Japanese Language], vol. 8, Kokugo-shi no Shin-shiten [A New Perspective on the History of the Japanese Language]. 311–335. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003. Virtual Nihongo: Yakuwarigo no Nazo [Virtual Japanese: The Enigma of Role Language]. Tokyo: Iwanami Publisher.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi (ed.). 2007. Yakuwarigo Kenkyū no Chihei [New Horizon of Role Language Research]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publisher.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi (ed.). 2011. Yakuwarigo Kenkyū no Tenkai [Development of Role Language Research]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publisher.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi. 2017. Virtual Japanese: Enigmas of Role Language. Osaka: Osaka University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kinsui, Satoshi & Hiroko Yamakido. 2015. Role Language and character language. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 5(2). 29–42. https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.5.2.29-42.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuroda, S.-Y. 2005. Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14. 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-2701-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1987. LF affix raising in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 362–367.Suche in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational Languages. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 79–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.04miy.Suche in Google Scholar

Nasu, Norio. 2012. Topic particle stranding and the structure of CP. In Rachel Nye, Liliane Haegeman & Lobke Aelbrecht (eds.), Main clause phenomena. New horizons, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.09nas.Suche in Google Scholar

Onodera, Noriko O. 2014. Setting up a mental space: A function of discourse markers at the left periphery (LP) and some observations about LP and RP in Japanese. Studies in Pragmatics 12. 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_006.Suche in Google Scholar

Oyharçabal, Bernard. 1993. Verb agreement with nonarguments: On allocutive agreement. In Jon Ortiz de Urbina & José Ignacio Hualde (eds.), Generative Stuides in Basque Linguistics, 89–114. Amsrterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.105.04oyhSuche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.101.14pes.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook of generative syntax,, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Robert. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–272. Waltham MA: Xerox College Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Sadanobu, Toshiyuki. 2007. Kyara joshi ga arawareru kankyō [The occurrence environment of “character-particles in Japanese and Korean]. In Satoshi Kinsui (ed.), Yakuwarigo Kenkyū no Chihei [New Horizon of Role Language Research], 27–48. Tokyo: Kurosio publisher.Suche in Google Scholar

Sakata, Minako. 1991. The acquisition of Japanese “gender” particles. Language & Communication 11(3). 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(91)90001-c.Suche in Google Scholar

Speas, Peggy & Carol L. Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna- Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar, vol. 1, Syntax and Semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe.Suche in Google Scholar

Teshigawara, Mihoko & Satoshi Kinsui. 2011. Modern Japanese “role language” (yakuwarigo): Fictional orality in Japanese literature and popular culture. Sociolinguistic Studies 5(1). 37–58.10.1558/sols.v5i1.37Suche in Google Scholar

Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783111354569Suche in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina, Johannes Heim, Keupdjio Hermann, Adriana Osa-Gómez del Campo & Sonja Thoma. 2015. Left of the left periphery : The syntax of discourse markers.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. Discourse particles in the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35. 543–566. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.241.Suche in Google Scholar