The Economic Theory of the Scholastics as a Contractual Analysis
-
Sylvain Trifilio
Abstract
The doctrine of the “just price” is more than often described as the core of the “economic” thinking of the Scholastics (de Roover 1958; Baldwin 1959; Wilson 1975; Worland 1977). In fact, one could hardly contest that the notion occupies a place of high importance in the economic reflections of the Medieval Doctors. It is of no doubt that their study of economic reality led them to call up very frequently the said notion of “just price”. Yet the insistence with which modern historiography has itself treated this – central but particular – element of the Scholastic economic thinking conceals, to our opinion, some of its important sights and interests. An “objective” approach of the scholastic theory seems to command such an interpretation. But why is the phrase “just price” so often used and developed by the Doctors? Such a simple question cannot be answered simply by focusing on the notion. From a more “methodological” point of view, just price appears only like the final result of a complex argumentation. Little attention has been given to the fact that (1) the issue at stake is less a problem of correctness in limited bargaining than a general question of social justice; (2) the method used to deal with this vast subject in the field of economic relations is a systematic “contractual” analysis. The second point forms the main theme of this paper.
References
Aquinas, T. [1265–1268] 1997. Summa Theologiæ, edited by T. McDermott. Notre Dame: Ave Maria Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. [1271–1272] 1964. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, edited by C. I. Litzinger. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. W. 1959. “The Medieval Theories of the Just Price: Romanists, Canonists, and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 49 (4): 1–92.10.2307/1005819Suche in Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1970. “Aristotle and Economic Analysis.” Past and Present 47 (1): 3–25.10.1093/past/47.1.3Suche in Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and J.-Y. Jolif, eds. 1958–1959. Aristote: Ethique À Nicomaque. Louvain-Paris: Publications universitaires-B. Nauwelearts.Suche in Google Scholar
Gómez Camacho, F. 1998. “Later Scholastics: Spanish Economic Thought in the XVIth and XVIIth Centuries,” in Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. T. Lowry, and B. Gordon, 503– 561. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450318_015Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, B. 1975. Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiode to Lessius. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02116-1Suche in Google Scholar
Grice-Hutchinson, M. 1952. The School of Salamanca: Readings in Spanish Monetary History, 1544–1604. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. 1951. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaye, J. 1998. “Monetary and Market Consciousness in Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Europe,” in Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. T. Lowry, and B. Gordon,, 371– 401. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450318_012Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I. 1979. Price and Value in the Aristotelian Tradition. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I. 1983. Wealth and Money in the Aristotelian Tradition. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I. 1992. Economics in the Medieval Schools, Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004452428Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I. 1998a. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511528491Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I 1998b. “The Medieval Schoolmen (1200–1400),” in Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. T. Lowry, and B. Gordon, 439– 501. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450318_014Suche in Google Scholar
Langholm, O. I. 2003. The Merchant in the Confessional, Leiden: BrillSuche in Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1988. Your Money or Your Life: Economy and Religion in the Middle Ages. New York: Zone Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1993. The Intellectuals in the Middle Ages. Blackwell: Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Lopez, R. 1971. The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350. New York: Prentice-Hall.Suche in Google Scholar
Lowry, S. T. 1969. “Aristotle’s Mathematical Analysis of Exchange.” History of Political Economy 1 (1): 44– 66.10.1215/00182702-1-1-44Suche in Google Scholar
Lowry, S. T. 1987. The Archaeology of Economic Ideas. Durham: Duke University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lowry, S. T. 1998. “The Economic and Jurisprudential Ideas of the Ancient Greeks: Our Heritage from Hellenic Thought,” in Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. T. Lowry, and B. Gordon, 11– 37. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004450318_004Suche in Google Scholar
Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice, edited by S. T. Lowry, and B. Gordon 1998. Leiden: BrillSuche in Google Scholar
McLaughlin, T. P. 1939–1940. “The Teaching of the Canonists on Usury (XIIth, XIIIth and XIVth Centuries).” Medieval Studies 1: 81– 147.10.1484/J.MS.2.305855Suche in Google Scholar
Meikle, S. 1995. Aristotle’s Economic Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198150022.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Noonan, J. T., Jr. 1957. The Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Olivi, P. de J. [1293–1294] 2012. Traité Des contrats/Tractatus De Contractibus, edited by S. Piron. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Suche in Google Scholar
Pirenne, H. [1925] 1969. Medieval Cities: Their Origins and the Revival of Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Roover, R. de. 1951. “Monopoly Theory Prior to Adam Smith: A Revision.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 65 (4): 492–524.10.2307/1882577Suche in Google Scholar
Roover, R. de. 1955. “Scholastic Economics: Surviving and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (2): 161–90.10.2307/1882146Suche in Google Scholar
Roover, R. de. 1958. “The Concept of Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy.” Journal of Economic History 18 (4): 418–34.10.1017/S0022050700107624Suche in Google Scholar
Roover, R. de. 1967. San Bernardino of Siena and Sant’Antonio of Florence. Boston: Baker Library-Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.Suche in Google Scholar
Roover, R. de. 1971. La pensée économique des scolastiques: Doctrines et méthodes. Montréal-Paris: Institut d'études médiévales-J. Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. A History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.Suche in Google Scholar
Spufford, P. 1984. “Le rôle de la monnaie dans la révolution commerciale du XIIIe siècle,” in Etudes d'histoire monétaire, edited by J. Day, 355– 395. Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, G. W. 1975. “The Economics of the Just Price.” History of Political Economy 7 (1): 56– 71.10.1215/00182702-7-1-56Suche in Google Scholar
Wood, D. 2002. Medieval Economic Thought. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811043Suche in Google Scholar
Worland, S. T. 1977. “Justum Pretium: One More Round in an ‘Endless Series’.” History of Political Economy 9 (4): 504– 21.10.1215/00182702-9-4-504Suche in Google Scholar
Young, J. T. 1995. “Natural Jurisprudence and the Theory of Value in Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 27 (4): 685– 89.10.1215/00182702-27-4-755Suche in Google Scholar
Young, J. T., and B. Gordon. 1997. “Natural Price and Commutative Justice: Adam Smith and the Just Price Traditions,” in Economics as a Moral Science: The Political Economy of Adam Smith, edited by J. T. Young, 107–127. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
