Investigation of the mechanism of soft tissue conduction explains several perplexing auditory phenomena

References

1. Kaufmann M, Adelman C, Sohmer H. Mapping at sites on bone and soft tissue on the head, neck and thorax at which a bone vibrator elicits auditory sensation. Audiol Neurootol Extra 2012;2:9–15.10.1159/000336159Suche in Google Scholar

2. Vento BA, Durrant JD. Assessing bone conduction thresholds in clinical practice. In: Katz J, Burkard R, Hood L, Medwetsky L, editors. Handbook of clinical audiology, 6th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Berger EH, Kieper RW, Gauger D. Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114:1955–67.10.1121/1.1605415Suche in Google Scholar

4. Cooper NP, Rhodes WS. Fast travelling waves, slow travelling waves and their interactions in experimental studies of apical cochlear mechanics. Auditory Neurosci 1996;2:289–99.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Olson ES. Fast waves, slow waves and cochlear excitation. J Acoust Soc Am 2013;133:3508, Abstract.10.1121/1.4806254Suche in Google Scholar

6. Olson ES. Fast waves, slow waves and cochlear excitation. Proceedings of Meetings of Acoustics 2013;19:1–19.10.1121/1.4799326Suche in Google Scholar

7. Perez R, Adelman C, Chordekar S, Ishai R, Sohmer H. Air, bone and soft tissue excitation of the cochlea in the presence of severe impediments to ossicle and window mobility. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-2887-8. Epub ahead of print.10.1007/s00405-014-2887-8Suche in Google Scholar

8. Geal-Dor M, Shore AF, Sohmer H. Auditory sensation via moist contact of the bone vibrator with skin at soft tissue sites. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2012;23:99–101.10.1515/jbcpp-2012-0035Suche in Google Scholar

9. Chordekar S, Perez R, Adelman C, Sohmer H. Assessment of inner ear bone vibrations during auditory stimulation by bone conduction and by soft tissue conduction. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2013;24:201–4.10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0058Suche in Google Scholar

10. Stenfelt S, Goode RL. Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1245–61.10.1097/01.mao.0000187236.10842.d5Suche in Google Scholar

11. Gerhardt KJ, Huang X, Arrington KE, Meixner K, Abrams RM, Antonelli PJ. Fetal sheep in utero hear through bone conduction. Am J Otolaryngol 1996;17:374–9.10.1016/S0196-0709(96)90069-1Suche in Google Scholar

12. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 2000;20:S21–30.10.1038/sj.jp.7200446Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sohmer H, Perez R, Sichel JY, Priner R, Freeman S. The pathway enabling external sounds to reach and excite the fetal inner ear. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:109–6.10.1159/000046817Suche in Google Scholar

14. Opperman LA. Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn 2000;219:472–85.10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1073>3.0.CO;2-FSuche in Google Scholar

15. Adelman C, Perez R, Sohmer H. Effect on auditory threshold of air and water pockets bordering the pathway between soft tissue stimulation sites and the cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:524–8.10.1177/000348941312200808Suche in Google Scholar

16. Hemila S, Nummela S, Reuter T. Anatomy and physics of the exceptional sensitivity of dolphin hearing (Odontoceti: Cetacea). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2010;196:165–79.10.1007/s00359-010-0504-xSuche in Google Scholar

17. Kraus HJ, Aulbach-Kraus K. Morphological changes in the cochlea of the mouse after the onset of hearing. Hear Res 1981;4:89–102.10.1016/0378-5955(81)90038-1Suche in Google Scholar

18. Pujol R. Morphology, synaptology and electrophysiology of the developing cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1985;421: 5–9.10.3109/00016488509121751Suche in Google Scholar

19. Lavigne-Rebillard M, Pujol R. Hair cell innervation in the fetal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1988;105:398–402.10.3109/00016488809119492Suche in Google Scholar

20. Nakamura K, Yuge K. Studies on fibrous tissues of the basilar membrane in inner ear. Auris Nasus Larynx 1982;9: 133–43.10.1016/S0385-8146(83)80015-7Suche in Google Scholar

21. Reinfeldt S, Ostli P, Hakansson B, Stenfelt S. Hearing one’s own voice during phoneme vocalization – transmission by air and bone conduction. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;128:751–62.10.1121/1.3458855Suche in Google Scholar

22. Baun J. Physical principles of general and vascular sonography. San Francisco, California: Pro Son Publishing, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Hofmann E, Behr R, Neumann-Haefelin T, Schwager K. Pulsatile tinnitus: imaging and differential diagnosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110:451–8.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Levine RA. Tinnitus: diagnostic approach leading to treatment. Semin Neurol 2013;33:256–9.10.1055/s-0033-1354603Suche in Google Scholar

25. De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Menovsky T. Pulsatile tinnitus due to a tortuous siphon-like internal carotid artery successfully treated by arterial remodeling. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2013;2013:938787.10.1155/2013/938787Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Iacovidou A, Giblett N, Doshi J, Jindal M. How reliable is the “scratch test” versus the Weber test after tympanomastoid surgery? Otol Neurotol 2014;35:762–3.10.1097/MAO.0000000000000357Suche in Google Scholar PubMed