Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire in Hebrew and in Arabic and its association with clinical tests in cochlear-implanted children

Miriam Geal-Dor; Rema Jbarah; Miriam Adler; Michal Kaufmann Yehezkely; Cahtia Adelman

doi:10.1515/jbcpp-2014-0039

Article

Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire in Hebrew and in Arabic and its association with clinical tests in cochlear-implanted children

, , , and

Published/Copyright: August 5, 2014

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Volume 25 Issue 3

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to describe the results of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire adapted to Hebrew and to Arabic and its association to clinical test results in children with cochlear implants. As assessment of hearing by audiometry does not always adequately reflect performance in daily life, questionnaires have been developed to assess functioning in natural surroundings and to track progress. In order to evaluate cochlear-implanted children’s verbal and communicative abilities, the parental ABEL questionnaire was developed in 2002. The advantages of the ABEL questionnaire are that it is intended for a wide age range, is quick to administer, and is filled out by parents themselves.

Methods: The ABEL questionnaire was translated into Hebrew and into Arabic and routinely used in the clinic. A total of 61 questionnaires were thus filled out by parents of children with cochlear implants (ages 3.9–14.3 years) when they came for routine mapping. Retrospectively, data were analyzed and questionnaire results were compared with performance with the implant on several clinical tests: audiometric thresholds, discrimination (percentage) of vowel-consonant-vowel nonsense syllables, and results of speech perception tests with monosyllabic and bisyllabic words and with sentences in quiet and in noise.

Results: A correlation was found between the different sections of the questionnaire, and age at implantation had a significant effect on questionnaire scores. However, correlations between questionnaire score and clinical tests were found only for speech perception tests in noise and not in quiet or to audiogram and speech reception threshold.

Conclusions: As has been reported previously, self-evaluation or parental evaluation does not always correlate with all measured results of hearing performance. However, the subjective information collected through questionnaires can be valuable for evaluation of progress, for counseling and rehabilitation training, as well as for mapping.

Keywords: ABEL, Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life; Arabic; auditory assessment; cochlear implant; hearing loss; Hebrew; questionnaire

Corresponding author: Miriam Geal-Dor, Speech and Hearing Center, Hebrew University School of Medicine – Hadassah Medical Center, POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel, Phone: +972-2-6778656, Fax: +972-26778918, E-mail: miriam112@bezeqint.net

Acknowledgments

We thank Yael Abed and Pninit Eldar for their help with data collection. We also thank the Neuman fund for Pediatric Audiology research.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Arlinger SD. How to assess outcome of hearing aid fitting in children. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001;53:68–72.10.1080/010503901750166709Search in Google Scholar

2. Brendel M, Frohne-Buechner C, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T, Buechner A. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance. Cochlear Implants Int 2014;15:13–9.10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000030Search in Google Scholar

3. Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Creighton J, Choo D. Auditory skills checklist: clinical tool for monitoring functional auditory skill development in young children with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:812–8.10.1177/000348940711601104Search in Google Scholar

4. Quar TK, Ching TY, Mukari SZ, Newall P. Parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale in the Malay language: data for normal-hearing children. Int J Audiol 2012;51:326–33.10.3109/14992027.2011.637079Search in Google Scholar

5. Kishon-Rabin L, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Ezrati-Vinacour R, Hildesheimer M. Prelexical vocalization in normal hearing and hearing-impaired infants before and after cochlear implantation and its relation to early auditory skills. Ear Hear 2005;26: 17S–29S.10.1097/00003446-200508001-00004Search in Google Scholar

6. McConkey-Robbins AM, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory-skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol 2004;130:570–4.10.1001/archotol.130.5.570Search in Google Scholar

7. Geal-Dor M, Jbarah R, Meilijson S, Adelman C, Levi H. The Hebrew and the Arabic version of the LittlEARS® auditory questionnaire for the assessment of auditory development: results in normal hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:1327–32.10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.030Search in Google Scholar

8. Galvin KL, Noble W. Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14:135–41.10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000014Search in Google Scholar

9. Purdy S, Farrington DR, Moran CA, Chard L, Hodgson SA. A parental questionnaire to evaluate children’s auditory behavior in everyday life (ABEL). Am J Audiol 2002;11:72–82.10.1044/1059-0889(2002/010)Search in Google Scholar

10. Souza MR, Osborn E, Gil D, Iório MC. Translation and adaptation of the ABEL: Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2011;23:368–75.10.1590/S2179-64912011000400013Search in Google Scholar

11. Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 1991;12(Suppl):144–50.Search in Google Scholar

12. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related QOL measures: literature review and proposed Guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–32.10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-NSearch in Google Scholar

13. Boothroyd A. Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;43:362–7.10.1121/1.1910787Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Silverman SR, Hirsh IJ. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1955;64:1234–44.10.1177/000348945506400424Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. May-Mederake B, Kuehn H, Vogel A, Keilmann A, Bohnert A, Mueller S, et al. Evaluation of auditory development in infants and toddlers who received cochlear implants under the age of 24 months with the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:1149–55.10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Zhou H, Chen Z, Shi H, Wu Y, Yin S. Categories of auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings of early-implanted children without speech training. PLoS One 2013;8:e53852.10.1371/journal.pone.0053852Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Gérard JM, Deggouj N, Hupin C, Buisson AL, Monteyne V, Lavis C, et al. Evolution of communication abilities after cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:642–8.10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.03.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Asp F, Mäki-Torkko E, Karltorp E, Harder H, Hergils L, Eskilsson G, et al. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: speech recognition, sound localization, and parental reports. Int J Audiol 2012;51:817–32.10.3109/14992027.2012.705898Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Huber M. Health-related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:1089–101.10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Rothpletz AM, Wightman FL, Kistler DJ. Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants. J Am Acad Audiol 2012;23:206–21.10.3766/jaaa.23.3.7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2014-3-31

Accepted: 2014-6-30

Published Online: 2014-8-5

Published in Print: 2014-9-1

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2014-0039

Keywords for this article

ABEL, Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life; Arabic; auditory assessment; cochlear implant; hearing loss; Hebrew; questionnaire