Startseite Generic instability in a frozen legal genre?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Generic instability in a frozen legal genre?

  • Ameni Hlioui EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Mai 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Though legal discourse has undergone several steps of metamorphosis to evolve from a law and language discourse that considers the subject of the law sacred to a language of the law discourse that views “language as social action and law as social discourse” (Goodrich 1987: 76), it is still believed that “legal language has to be the way it is” (Danet 1980: 541). This is relevant especially to those genres at the frozen written end of the legal discourse scale. However, the fact that legal texts “can be relatively precise, or quite general or vague, depending on the strategic objectives of the drafter” (Tiersma 2008: 7) can create blurs within the determinacy of such genres. In this context, the genre of Life Insurance Contracts which belongs to the written mode and frozen style end of the legal language continuum is studied to investigate to what extent we can talk about challenging generic stability in such a genre. The focus is put specifically on the frequency of use of personal pronouns in this genre that claims functional redundancy. The experiential meta-function of Systemic Functional Linguistics is also used to detect the participant roles assigned to these pronouns and to find out if the frequency of certain roles is generic. These frequencies that are computed using the UAM computational CorpusTool in a corpus made up of 16 contracts counting 174.288 words are studied in relation to the purposes of the legal genre of Life Insurance Contracts.


Corresponding author: Ameni Hlioui,LAD Research Unit, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia, E-mail:

References

Astor, Bart. 1999. Understanding life insurance. New York: IDG Books Worldwide.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written english. Longman, New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Bouharaoui, Adil. 2008. Some lexical features of english legal language. Available at: https://www.translationdirectory.com/articles/article1763.php (accessed 7 March, 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Brannon, Gerard M. 1991. Public policy and life insurance. Conference Series; [Proceedings]. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 35, 199–238.Suche in Google Scholar

Chan, Cheris Shung-Ching. 2012. Marketing death: Culture and the making of a life insurance market in China. New York: Oxford Univ Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195394078.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Crandall, JoAnn & Veda R. Charrow. 1990. Linguistic aspects of legal language. United States: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).Suche in Google Scholar

Danet, Brenda. 1980. Language in the legal process. Law & Society Review 14(3). Contemporary Issues in Law and Social Science, 445–564. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3053192 (accessed 22 April 2017).10.2307/3053192Suche in Google Scholar

Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics, 2nd edn. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Suche in Google Scholar

Faig, Kenneth. 2003. The murder of the insured by the beneficiary: Attempting to quantify one moral hazard relating to life insurance contracts. Journal of Insurance Regulation 21(3). 3–6. https://www.naic.org/documents/prod_serv_jir_sample.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise. 2006. Where do ‘we’ fit in? Linguistic inclusion and exclusion in a virtual community. In: Kristin Bührig & Jan D. ten. Thije (eds.), Beyond misunderstanding, the linguistic reconstruction of intercultural communication, 319–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.144.12fonSuche in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise & Akila Sellami Baklouti. 2018. Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics. In: Akila Sellami Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 1–5. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315299877-1Suche in Google Scholar

Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.10.1007/978-1-349-11283-8Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Jonathan J. Webster. 2009. Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. London & New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Haigh, Rupert. 2009. Legal English, 2nd edn. Cavendish Publishing Limited, Great Britain.10.4324/9780203877968Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Revised by Mathiessen, Christian. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Suche in Google Scholar

Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2009. The place of context in a systemic functional model. In: Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 166–189. London & New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2013. Choice, system, realization: Describing language as meaning potential. In: Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard. O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 269–299. United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ Press.10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. 1934. The pure theory of law, its methods and fundamental concepts. Law Quarterly Review 50. 474–498.Suche in Google Scholar

Marina, Kozlova. 2019. Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the internet. SHS Web of Conferences 69(1-5), 00067. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900067 (accessed 14 March 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Llopis, M. A. O. 1999. The analysis of a legal text: Lloyd’s institute cargo clauses. IATEFL ESP SIG Newsletter 14August 1999, 23–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R., Christian Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 1997. Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold, Hodder Headline Group.Suche in Google Scholar

Orts, María Ángeles. 2015. Power and complexity in legal genres: Unveiling insurance policies and arbitration rules. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 28(3). 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9429-6 (accessed 13 March 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. 2011. The secret life of pronouns; what our words say about us. New York: Bloomsbury Press.10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62167-2Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartika. 2005. A comprehensive grammar of the english language. London & New York: Longman Group Limited.Suche in Google Scholar

Robaldo, Livio, Serena Villata, Adam Wyner & Matthias Grabmair. 2019. Introduction for artificial intelligence and law: special issue “natural language processing for legal texts”. Artificial Intelligence and Law 27(2). 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09251-2 (accessed 13 March 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Thomson, Audrey Jean & Agnes V Martinet. 1986. A practical english grammar, 4th edn. Hong Kong: Oxford Univ Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter. 2008. The nature of legal language. In: John Gibbons & M. Teresa Turell (eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics, 7–25. Amsterdam & Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.03tie (accessed 11 June 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Vogel, Friedemann. 2017. Calculating legal meanings? Drawbacks and opportunities of corpus-assisted legal linguistics to make the law (more) explicit. In: Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), The pragmatic turn in law: Inference and interpretation in legal discourse, 287–306. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-012 (accessed 14 March 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Christopher. 2004. Legal English and plain language: An introduction. ESP Across Cultures 1(1). 111–124. https://fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/williams_2004_legal_english_and_plain_language-libre_0.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-05-04
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijld-2020-2028/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen