Abstract
Though legal discourse has undergone several steps of metamorphosis to evolve from a law and language discourse that considers the subject of the law sacred to a language of the law discourse that views “language as social action and law as social discourse” (Goodrich 1987: 76), it is still believed that “legal language has to be the way it is” (Danet 1980: 541). This is relevant especially to those genres at the frozen written end of the legal discourse scale. However, the fact that legal texts “can be relatively precise, or quite general or vague, depending on the strategic objectives of the drafter” (Tiersma 2008: 7) can create blurs within the determinacy of such genres. In this context, the genre of Life Insurance Contracts which belongs to the written mode and frozen style end of the legal language continuum is studied to investigate to what extent we can talk about challenging generic stability in such a genre. The focus is put specifically on the frequency of use of personal pronouns in this genre that claims functional redundancy. The experiential meta-function of Systemic Functional Linguistics is also used to detect the participant roles assigned to these pronouns and to find out if the frequency of certain roles is generic. These frequencies that are computed using the UAM computational CorpusTool in a corpus made up of 16 contracts counting 174.288 words are studied in relation to the purposes of the legal genre of Life Insurance Contracts.
References
Astor, Bart. 1999. Understanding life insurance. New York: IDG Books Worldwide.Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written english. Longman, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Bouharaoui, Adil. 2008. Some lexical features of english legal language. Available at: https://www.translationdirectory.com/articles/article1763.php (accessed 7 March, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Brannon, Gerard M. 1991. Public policy and life insurance. Conference Series; [Proceedings]. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 35, 199–238.Search in Google Scholar
Chan, Cheris Shung-Ching. 2012. Marketing death: Culture and the making of a life insurance market in China. New York: Oxford Univ Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195394078.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Crandall, JoAnn & Veda R. Charrow. 1990. Linguistic aspects of legal language. United States: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).Search in Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1980. Language in the legal process. Law & Society Review 14(3). Contemporary Issues in Law and Social Science, 445–564. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3053192 (accessed 22 April 2017).10.2307/3053192Search in Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics, 2nd edn. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar
Faig, Kenneth. 2003. The murder of the insured by the beneficiary: Attempting to quantify one moral hazard relating to life insurance contracts. Journal of Insurance Regulation 21(3). 3–6. https://www.naic.org/documents/prod_serv_jir_sample.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise. 2006. Where do ‘we’ fit in? Linguistic inclusion and exclusion in a virtual community. In: Kristin Bührig & Jan D. ten. Thije (eds.), Beyond misunderstanding, the linguistic reconstruction of intercultural communication, 319–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.144.12fonSearch in Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise & Akila Sellami Baklouti. 2018. Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics. In: Akila Sellami Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 1–5. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315299877-1Search in Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal discourse: Studies in linguistics, rhetoric and legal analysis. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.10.1007/978-1-349-11283-8Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Jonathan J. Webster. 2009. Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Haigh, Rupert. 2009. Legal English, 2nd edn. Cavendish Publishing Limited, Great Britain.10.4324/9780203877968Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Revised by Mathiessen, Christian. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2009. The place of context in a systemic functional model. In: Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 166–189. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2013. Choice, system, realization: Describing language as meaning potential. In: Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard. O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 269–299. United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ Press.10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018Search in Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1934. The pure theory of law, its methods and fundamental concepts. Law Quarterly Review 50. 474–498.Search in Google Scholar
Marina, Kozlova. 2019. Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the internet. SHS Web of Conferences 69(1-5), 00067. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900067 (accessed 14 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Llopis, M. A. O. 1999. The analysis of a legal text: Lloyd’s institute cargo clauses. IATEFL ESP SIG Newsletter 14August 1999, 23–26.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James R., Christian Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 1997. Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold, Hodder Headline Group.Search in Google Scholar
Orts, María Ángeles. 2015. Power and complexity in legal genres: Unveiling insurance policies and arbitration rules. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 28(3). 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9429-6 (accessed 13 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W. 2011. The secret life of pronouns; what our words say about us. New York: Bloomsbury Press.10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62167-2Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartika. 2005. A comprehensive grammar of the english language. London & New York: Longman Group Limited.Search in Google Scholar
Robaldo, Livio, Serena Villata, Adam Wyner & Matthias Grabmair. 2019. Introduction for artificial intelligence and law: special issue “natural language processing for legal texts”. Artificial Intelligence and Law 27(2). 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09251-2 (accessed 13 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, Audrey Jean & Agnes V Martinet. 1986. A practical english grammar, 4th edn. Hong Kong: Oxford Univ Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter. 2008. The nature of legal language. In: John Gibbons & M. Teresa Turell (eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics, 7–25. Amsterdam & Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.03tie (accessed 11 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Vogel, Friedemann. 2017. Calculating legal meanings? Drawbacks and opportunities of corpus-assisted legal linguistics to make the law (more) explicit. In: Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), The pragmatic turn in law: Inference and interpretation in legal discourse, 287–306. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-012 (accessed 14 March 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher. 2004. Legal English and plain language: An introduction. ESP Across Cultures 1(1). 111–124. https://fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/williams_2004_legal_english_and_plain_language-libre_0.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Exploring the cyber governance discourse: A perspective from China
- Legal complexity and state obligations to the right to food: Towards an analytical shift of progressive realisation
- Duansheng Qian’s thoughts on human rights
- Generic instability in a frozen legal genre?
- The importance of Internet systematic search for legal translations
- Reviews
- An oriental face in international law scholarship: Contemporary value of Bin Cheng’s General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals
- Bart Custers et al. (2019): EU personal data protection in policy and practice
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Exploring the cyber governance discourse: A perspective from China
- Legal complexity and state obligations to the right to food: Towards an analytical shift of progressive realisation
- Duansheng Qian’s thoughts on human rights
- Generic instability in a frozen legal genre?
- The importance of Internet systematic search for legal translations
- Reviews
- An oriental face in international law scholarship: Contemporary value of Bin Cheng’s General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals
- Bart Custers et al. (2019): EU personal data protection in policy and practice