Startseite Dynamic Performance Comparison for MPPT-PV Systems using Hybrid Pspice/Matlab Simulation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Dynamic Performance Comparison for MPPT-PV Systems using Hybrid Pspice/Matlab Simulation

  • N. Aouchiche EMAIL logo , M. Becherif , A. HadjArab , M. S. Aitcheikh , H. S. Ramadan und A. Cheknane
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. September 2016

Abstract

The power generated by solar photovoltaic (PV) module depends on the surrounding irradiance and temperature. This paper presents a hybrid Matlab™/Pspice™ simulation model of PV system, combined with Cadence software SLPS. The hybridization is performed in order to gain the advantages of both simulation tools such as accuracy and efficiency in both Pspice electronic circuit and Matlab™ mathematical modelling respectively. For this purpose, the PV panel and the boost converter are developed using Pspice™ and hybridized with the mathematical Matlab™ model of maximum power point method controller (MPPT) through SLPS. The main objective is verify the significance of using the proposed hybrid simulation techniques in comparing the different MPPT algorithms such as the perturbation and observation (P&O), incremental of conductance (Inc-Cond) and counter reaction voltage using pilot cell (Pilot-Cell). Various simulations are performed under different atmospheric conditions in order to evaluate the dynamic behaviour for the system under study in terms of stability, efficiency and rapidity.

Nomenclature

α1

Ideality factor of diode 1.

α2

Ideality factor of diode 2.

C1, C2

Capacities (F).

CP

Perturbation step width.

D

Diode

d

Duty Cycle.

D1, D2

diodes.

E

Irradiance.

I

Photovoltaic generator current (A).

Inc-Cond

Incremental of conductance.

ID1,ID2

Diodes current (A).

IS

Current of saturation (A).

ic1, ic2

Capacities currents (V, A).

ie

Input current (A).

io

Output current (A).

iL

Self-inductance current (A).

Iph

Photo-generation current (A).

is

Interrupter current (A).

K

Pilot-Cell factor.

k

Boltzmann constant (JK−1).

L

Self-inductance (H).

M(d)

Conversion ratio.

Ns

PV cell number connected in series.

Pilot-Cell

counter reaction voltage using pilot cell

P&O

perturbation and observation.

PV

Photovoltaic.

PWM

Pulse width modulation.

RE

Renewable energy.

Rp

Shunt resistance (Ω).

Rs

Serial resistance (Ω).

S

Switch (Mosfet).

T

Junction temperature (K).

Ts

Commutation period.

Vco

Opened circuit voltage (V).

Ve

Input voltage (V).

Vo

Output voltage (V).

VJ

Junction Voltage (V)

vL

Self-inductance voltage (V).

Appendix

Appendix 1: Atmospheric conditions for test

t (s)E (W/m2)T (°C)
Linear and slow Change of irradiance[0, 1500]40025
[1500, 2500][400, 1000]25
[2500, 3000]100025
Linear and rapid Change of irradiance[0, 350]40025
[350, 500][300, 900]25
[500, 1400]90025
Linear and slow Change of temperature T[0, 1000]10000
[1000, 1300]1000[0, 20]
[1300, 2000]100020

References

1. Nassor TS, Senjyu T, Yona A. Enhancement of voltage stability of DC smart grid during islanded mode by load shedding scheme. IJEEPS 2015;16(5):491–501.10.1515/ijeeps-2015-0016Suche in Google Scholar

2. Schafer O, Watson J. Global Market Outlook for Solar Power/2015–2019, Solar Power Europe, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Alonso C. Contribution to optimisation and energy treatment management. Thesis for obtention the habilitation to conduct researchs. University of P. Sabatier – Toulouse, 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Zhang F, Maddy J, Premier G, Guwy A. Novel current sensing photovoltaic maximum power point tracking based on sliding mode control strategy. Elsevier Solar Energy 2015;118:80–6.10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.039Suche in Google Scholar

5. Bendib B, Krimb F, Belmilia H, Almia MF, Boulouma S. Advanced fuzzy MPPT controller for a stand-alone PV system. International Conference on Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability, TMREES 14. Energy Procedia 2015;50:383–92.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.046Suche in Google Scholar

6. Bendib B, Belmili H, Krim F. A survey of the most used MPPT methods: Conventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2015;45:637–48.10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.009Suche in Google Scholar

7. Fathabadi H. Novel fast dynamic MPPT technique with the capability of very high accurate power tracking. Energy 2016;94:466–75.10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.133Suche in Google Scholar

8. Zhao J, Zhou X, Ma Y, Liu W. A novel maximum power point tracking strategy based on optimal voltage control for photovoltaic systems under variable environmental conditions. Solar Energy 2015;122:640–9.10.1016/j.solener.2015.09.040Suche in Google Scholar

9. Murtaza A, Chiaberge M, Giuseppe MD, Boero D. A duty cycle optimization based hybrid MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems. Electr Power Energy Syst 2014;59:141–54.10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.02.009Suche in Google Scholar

10. Sundareswaran K, Kumar V, Palani S. Application of a combined particle swarm optimization and perturb and observe method for MPPT in PV systems under partial shading conditions. Renewable Energy 2015;75:308–17.10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.044Suche in Google Scholar

11. Rujula AAB, Abian JAC. A novel MPPT method for PV systems with irradiance measurement. Solar Energy 2014;109:95–104.10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.017Suche in Google Scholar

12. “Pspice slps interface version 2.5 user’s guide” Copyright © 2004–2005 Cybernet Systems, Co., Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Babu BC, Gurjar S, Meher A. Analysis of photovoltaic (PV) module during partial shading based on simplified two-diode model. IJEEPS 2015;16(1):15–21.10.1515/ijeeps-2014-0164Suche in Google Scholar

14. Dash PP, Yazdani A. A mathematical model and performance evaluation for a single-stage grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system. IJEEPS 2008;9(6):Article 5.10.2202/1553-779X.2033Suche in Google Scholar

15. Möller HJ. Semiconductors for solar cells. Norwood, MA: Artech House, Inc, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Knopf H. Analysis, simulation, and evaluation of MPPT methods for a solar powered vehicle. Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, Portland University, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Cabal C. Energetic optimisation of electronic adaptation stage dedicated to the photovoltaic conversion. Doctoral Thesis, University of P. Sabatier-Toulouse, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Schmid J, Schmidt H. Power conditioning for photovoltaic power systems. Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Akihiro O. Design and simulation of photovoltaic water pumping system. Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, Faculty of California, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Park S, Jahns TM. A Self-boost charge pump topology for a gate drive high-side power supply. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2005;20(2):300–7.10.1109/TPEL.2004.843013Suche in Google Scholar

21. Chandrashekhar BND, Siva MG. Novel control of photovoltaic based water pumping system without energy storage. IJEEPS 2012;13(5):Article 1.10.1515/1553-779X.2931Suche in Google Scholar

22. Esram T, Chapman PL. Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2007;22(2):439–49.10.1109/TEC.2006.874230Suche in Google Scholar

23. Kolluru VR, Mahapatra K, Subudhi B. Real-time digital simulation and analysis of sliding mode and P&O MPPT algorithms for a PV system. IJEEPS 2015;16(4):313–22.10.1515/ijeeps-2015-0010Suche in Google Scholar

24. Fadat J. MPPT controller of photovoltaic conversion chain. Revue 2005;3EI(43):50–62.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Reisi AR, Moradi MH, Jamasb S. Classification and comparison of MPPT techniques for photovoltaic system. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2013;19:433–43.10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.052Suche in Google Scholar

26. Salameh ZM, Dagher F, Lynch WA. Step-down MPPT for photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy 1991;46:279–82.10.1016/0038-092X(91)90095-ESuche in Google Scholar

27. Hussein KH, Muta I, Hoshino T, Osakada M. Maximum photovoltaic power tracking. IEEE Proceed Gener Transm Distrib 1995;142:59–64.10.1049/ip-gtd:19951577Suche in Google Scholar

28. Lapena OL, Penella MT, Gasulla M. A closed -loop MPPT for sub watt photovoltaic panels. IEEE Trans Indus Electron 2012;59(3):1588–96.10.1109/TIE.2011.2161254Suche in Google Scholar

29. Yuncong J, Qahouq JAA, Orabi M. Matlab/Pspice hybrid simulation modeling of solar PV cell/module. In Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2011 Twenty-Sixth Annual IEEE, 1244–1250, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Boussetta H. Multi-physics modelisation and global multi-physiques et simulation of standalone systems. Doctoral thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Grenoble & University of Carthage, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-9-30
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2016-0074/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen