Abstract
The aim of this work is to show how Novalis designs his own development of Fichte’s and Kant’s gnoseological systems. The analysis is brought upon the distinction between “natural man” and “artificial man” expressed in Novalis’ fragments, and follows his exam of Nature, I and God – all three considered by a Kantian and Fichtean perspective. The conclusion of this paper is to show how two of the main concepts of Novalis’ philosophy (Schweben and Romantisierung) can be used as aesthetical and gnoseological devices to comprehend Novalis’ interpretation of the subject.
References
Beiser, F. C. (2002). German idealism. The struggle against subjectivism, 1781–1801. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020702Suche in Google Scholar
Desideri, F. (1997). Il velo di Iside. Coscienza, messianismo e natura nel pensiero romantico. Pendragon.Suche in Google Scholar
Desideri, F., & Moretti, G. (cur.) (2019). Novalis. Scritti filosofici. Morcelliana.Suche in Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1794). Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre. Als Handschrift für seine Zuhörer. In H. Jacob, & R. Lauth (Eds.), (1965), J. G. Fichte Gesamtausgabe. Bd. I, 2: Werke 1793-1795. Friedrich Fromman Verlag.10.5771/9783772832406-173Suche in Google Scholar
Frank, M. (2004). The philosophical foundations of early German romanticism, translated by Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert. SUNY.10.1353/book4754Suche in Google Scholar
Higgins, D. (1988 [1978]). Novalis. Hymns to the night (3rd ed.), McPherson.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2019). From Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre to Novalis’ poetic historicity. Symphilosophie, 1, 105–127.Suche in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In W. Weischedel (Ed.), (1974), Immanuel Kant Werkausgabe. Bd. III: Kritik der reinen Vernunft 1. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. In W. Weischedel (Ed.), (1974), Immanuel Kant Werkausgabe. Bd. X: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Kluckohn, P., & Samuel, R. (Eds.). (1960). Novalis Schriften, bd. I–III. W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Molina, E. (2017). Kant’s conception of subject. CR: The New Centennial Review, 17(2), 77–94.10.14321/crnewcentrevi.17.2.0077Suche in Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (2016). Novalis. Pensiero, poesia, romanzo. Morcelliana.Suche in Google Scholar
Pascal, R. (1929). A transition point in German romanticism, The Modern Language Review, 24(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3715961.Suche in Google Scholar
Schefer, O. (2000). Les «Fichte-studien» de Novalis et la Tathandlung à l’épreuve de la transcendance. Les Études philosophiques, 1, 55–74.Suche in Google Scholar
Schlegel, F. (1958). In E. Behler, J. J. Anstett & H. Eichner (Zusammenarb.) (Eds.), Kritis che Friederich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Schöningh.Suche in Google Scholar
Wood, D. W. (Ed.). (2007). Notes for a Romantic Encyclopaedia. SUNY: Das Allgemeine Brouillon.Suche in Google Scholar
Wood, D. W. (2014). From “Fichticizing” to “Romanticizing”. Fichte and Novalis on the activities of philosophy and art. In I. Radrizzani (Ed.), Fichte-studien, 2014/1 (Band) 41: Fichte und die Kunst (pp. 247–278).10.5840/fichte20144115Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Philosophy and Jena Romanticism
- Research Articles
- The Contemporary Significance of Early German Romantic Philosophy
- A Note on Friedrich Schlegel’s Reception of the Wissenschaftslehre
- The Mythology of Reason in “Das älteste Systemprogramm”: A Hegelian Project?
- Serious Jokes: Friedrich Schlegel and the Philosophical Use of Irony
- On the Roots of Romantic Irony and the Pleasure of Being (Mis)understood
- Schelling’s Clara: Romantic Psychotherapy
- The Natural Man: Novalis’ Aesthetic Anthropology
- The Transcendental Grounds of Novalis’ Conception of Life as Poetical Work
- Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy
- Novalis’ Metaphysics of Having: A Step Towards an Environmental Conception of the Human–Nature Relationship
- Review Essay
- Jena Romanticism Revisited
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Philosophy and Jena Romanticism
- Research Articles
- The Contemporary Significance of Early German Romantic Philosophy
- A Note on Friedrich Schlegel’s Reception of the Wissenschaftslehre
- The Mythology of Reason in “Das älteste Systemprogramm”: A Hegelian Project?
- Serious Jokes: Friedrich Schlegel and the Philosophical Use of Irony
- On the Roots of Romantic Irony and the Pleasure of Being (Mis)understood
- Schelling’s Clara: Romantic Psychotherapy
- The Natural Man: Novalis’ Aesthetic Anthropology
- The Transcendental Grounds of Novalis’ Conception of Life as Poetical Work
- Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy
- Novalis’ Metaphysics of Having: A Step Towards an Environmental Conception of the Human–Nature Relationship
- Review Essay
- Jena Romanticism Revisited