Home Social Sciences The Natural Man: Novalis’ Aesthetic Anthropology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Natural Man: Novalis’ Aesthetic Anthropology

  • Matteo Cherubini ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 5, 2023

Abstract

The aim of this work is to show how Novalis designs his own development of Fichte’s and Kant’s gnoseological systems. The analysis is brought upon the distinction between “natural man” and “artificial man” expressed in Novalis’ fragments, and follows his exam of Nature, I and God – all three considered by a Kantian and Fichtean perspective. The conclusion of this paper is to show how two of the main concepts of Novalis’ philosophy (Schweben and Romantisierung) can be used as aesthetical and gnoseological devices to comprehend Novalis’ interpretation of the subject.


Corresponding author: Matteo Cherubini, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy, E-mail:

References

Beiser, F. C. (2002). German idealism. The struggle against subjectivism, 1781–1801. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020702Search in Google Scholar

Desideri, F. (1997). Il velo di Iside. Coscienza, messianismo e natura nel pensiero romantico. Pendragon.Search in Google Scholar

Desideri, F., & Moretti, G. (cur.) (2019). Novalis. Scritti filosofici. Morcelliana.Search in Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1794). Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre. Als Handschrift für seine Zuhörer. In H. Jacob, & R. Lauth (Eds.), (1965), J. G. Fichte Gesamtausgabe. Bd. I, 2: Werke 1793-1795. Friedrich Fromman Verlag.10.5771/9783772832406-173Search in Google Scholar

Frank, M. (2004). The philosophical foundations of early German romanticism, translated by Elizabeth Millán-Zaibert. SUNY.10.1353/book4754Search in Google Scholar

Higgins, D. (1988 [1978]). Novalis. Hymns to the night (3rd ed.), McPherson.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. (2019). From Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre to Novalis’ poetic historicity. Symphilosophie, 1, 105–127.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In W. Weischedel (Ed.), (1974), Immanuel Kant Werkausgabe. Bd. III: Kritik der reinen Vernunft 1. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. In W. Weischedel (Ed.), (1974), Immanuel Kant Werkausgabe. Bd. X: Kritik der Urteilskraft. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kluckohn, P., & Samuel, R. (Eds.). (1960). Novalis Schriften, bd. I–III. W. Kohlhammer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Molina, E. (2017). Kant’s conception of subject. CR: The New Centennial Review, 17(2), 77–94.10.14321/crnewcentrevi.17.2.0077Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, G. (2016). Novalis. Pensiero, poesia, romanzo. Morcelliana.Search in Google Scholar

Pascal, R. (1929). A transition point in German romanticism, The Modern Language Review, 24(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3715961.Search in Google Scholar

Schefer, O. (2000). Les «Fichte-studien» de Novalis et la Tathandlung à l’épreuve de la transcendance. Les Études philosophiques, 1, 55–74.Search in Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. (1958). In E. Behler, J. J. Anstett & H. Eichner (Zusammenarb.) (Eds.), Kritis che Friederich-Schlegel-Ausgabe. Schöningh.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, D. W. (Ed.). (2007). Notes for a Romantic Encyclopaedia. SUNY: Das Allgemeine Brouillon.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, D. W. (2014). From “Fichticizing” to “Romanticizing”. Fichte and Novalis on the activities of philosophy and art. In I. Radrizzani (Ed.), Fichte-studien, 2014/1 (Band) 41: Fichte und die Kunst (pp. 247–278).10.5840/fichte20144115Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-01-02
Accepted: 2023-08-12
Published Online: 2023-09-05
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2023-0002/pdf
Scroll to top button