Interest Rate Persistence and Monetary Policy Rule in Light of Model Uncertainty

Shou-Yung Yin; Chang-Ching Lin; Ming-Jen Chang

doi:10.1515/ger-2022-0076

Artikel

Interest Rate Persistence and Monetary Policy Rule in Light of Model Uncertainty

Shou-Yung Yin , Chang-Ching Lin und Ming-Jen Chang

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. März 2023

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift German Economic Review Band 24 Heft 2

Abstract

We study how model uncertainty affects the understanding of the interest rate persistence using a generalized Taylor-rule function covering numerous submodels via model average approach. The data-driven weights can be regarded as a measure of power-sharing across monetary policy committee members. We show that the model uncertainty is important in Canada, France, and Sweden, and the implied weights indicate that the U.K. and the U.S. have a lower model uncertainty caused either by an over-influential chairman or the consistent agreement of committee members. The importance of model uncertainty can be emphasized by sequential estimation during the 2008 financial crisis.

Keywords: endogeneity; interest rate smoothing; model uncertainty; partial adjustment; policy inertia; serial correlation; Taylor-rule

JEL Classification: C52; E47; E52; E58

Corresponding author: Ming-Jen Chang, Economics, National Dong Hwa University, 1, Da-Hsueh Rd., Shou-Feng, Hualien 97401, Taiwan, E-mail: mjchang@gms.ndhu.edu.tw

Funding source: National Science Council

Award Identifier / Grant number: NSC 102-2410-H-259-005-

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Christina Gerberding and Anthony Garratt for sharing real-time data. We have benefited immensely from the insightful comments provided by Shiu-Sheng Chen, Kuo-Hsuan Chin, Tai-Kuang Ho and Zong-Shin Liu as well as seminar participants at Feng Chia University, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, and National Tsing Hua University. We appreciate the feedback and comments received from colleagues at the 21st Macroeconometric Modelling Workshop, the Taiwan Economic Association 2015 Annual Meeting, and the Taiwan Econometric Association 2020 Annual Meeting. Ming-Jen Chang thanks the National Science Council of Taiwan for financial support (NSC 102-2410-H-259-005-).

Research funding: None declared.
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Appendix

$Figure 8: Interest rate i t , forecasted inflation rate π ̂ t + 4 | t ${\hat{\pi }}_{t+4\vert t}$ and estimated output gaps y ̂ t ${\hat{y}}_{t}$ for seven countries.$

Figure 8:

Interest rate i _t, forecasted inflation rate π ̂ t + 4 | t and estimated output gaps y ̂ t for seven countries.

References

Andrews, D. W., and B. Lu. 2001. “Consistent Model and Moment Selection Procedures for GMM Estimation with Application to Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 101: 123–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(00)00077-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Apel, M., M. Blix Grimaldi, and I. Hull. 2022. “How Much Information do Monetary Policy Committees Disclose? Evidence from the FOMC’s Minutes and Transcripts.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 54: 1459–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12885.Suche in Google Scholar

Bai, J., and S. Ng. 2002. “Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models.” Econometrica 70: 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00273.Suche in Google Scholar

Bai, J., and S. Ng. 2008. “Forecasting Economic Time Series Using Targeted Predictors.” Journal of Econometrics 146: 304–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.08.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Bai, J., and S. Ng. 2009. “Boosting Diffusion Indices.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 24: 607–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1063.Suche in Google Scholar

Brock, W. A., S. N. Durlauf, and K. D. West. 2007. “Model Uncertainty and Policy Evaluation: Some Theory and Empirics.” Journal of Econometrics 136: 629–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.11.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Buckland, S. T., K. P. Burnham, and N. H. Augustin. 1997. “Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference.” Biometrics 53: 603–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533961.Suche in Google Scholar

Bullard, J., and K. Mitra. 2007. “Determinacy, Learnability, and Monetary Policy Inertia.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 39: 1177–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00062.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Burnham, K., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach In Ecological Modelling. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Suche in Google Scholar

Caputo, R., and A. Díaz. 2018. “Now and Always, the Relevance of the Taylor Rule in Europe.” International Journal of Finance & Economics 23: 41–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1601.Suche in Google Scholar

Carvalho, C., F. Nechio, and T. Tristao. 2021. “Taylor Rule Estimation by OLS.” Journal of Monetary Economics 124: 140–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.10.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Castelnuovo, E. 2007a. “Cost Channel and the Price Puzzle: The Role of Interest Rate Smoothing.” Unpublished manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Castelnuovo, E. 2007. “Taylor Rules and Interest Rate Smoothing in the Euro Area.” The Manchester School 75 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2007.01000.x Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, H. W., and R. R. McGregor. 2017. “The Lower Bound and the Causes of Monetary Policy Inertia: Evidence from Sweden.” Applied Economics 49: 1132–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1213360.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, H. W.Jr, and R. R. McGregor. 2018. “Committee Decision-Making at Sweden’s Riksbank.” European Journal of Political Economy 53: 120–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, H. W.Jr, R. R. McGregor, and T. A. Vermilyea. 2014. “Power-Sharing in Monetary Policy Committees: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Sweden.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 46: 665–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12121.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, J.-e., and M. Kashiwagi. 2017. “The Japanese Taylor Rule Estimated Using Censored Quantile Regressions.” Empirical Economics 52: 357–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1074-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarida, R., J. Galí, and M. Gertler. 1998. “Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence.” European Economic Review 42: 1033–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00016-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarida, R., J. Galí, and M. Gertler. 2000. “Monetary Policy Rules and Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 147–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554692.Suche in Google Scholar

Coibion, O., and Y. Gorodnichenko. 2012. “Why are Target Interest Rate Changes so Persistent.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4: 126–62. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.4.4.126.Suche in Google Scholar

Consolo, A., and C. A. Favero. 2009. “Monetary Policy Inertia: More a Fiction Than a Fact?” Journal of Monetary Economics 56: 900–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.06.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Curtis, D. 2005. “Monetary Policy and Economic Activity in Canada in the 1990s.” Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques 31: 59–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552595.Suche in Google Scholar

Durbin, J. 1970. “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression when Some of the Regressors Are Lagged Dependent.” Econometrica 38: 410–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909547.Suche in Google Scholar

English, W. B., W. R. Nelson, and B. P. Sack. 2003. “Interpreting the Significance of the Lagged Interest Rate in Estimated Monetary Policy Rules.” Contributions to Macroeconomics 3: 1073. https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-6005.1073.Suche in Google Scholar

Fève, P., J. Matheron, and C. Poilly. 2007. “Monetary Policy Dynamics in the Euro Area.” Economics Letters 96: 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.12.030.Suche in Google Scholar

Garratt, A., G. Koop, E. Mise, and S. P. Vahey. 2009. “Real-Time Prediction with U.K. Monetary Aggregates in the Presence of Model Uncertainty.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 27: 480–91. https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.07208.Suche in Google Scholar

Gerdesmeier, D., F. Mongelli, and B. Roffia. 2010. “Interest Rate Setting by the Fed, the ECB, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England Compared.” Comparative Economic Studies 52: 549–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2010.15.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayo, B., and P. G. Méon. 2013. “Behind Closed Doors: Revealing the ECB’s Decision Rule.” Journal of International Money and Finance 37: 135–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayo, B., and M. Neuenkirch. 2011. “Canadian Interest Rate Setting: The Information Content of Canadian and U.S. Central Bank Communication.” Southern Economic Journal 78: 131–48. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.131.Suche in Google Scholar

Kam, T. 2007. “Interest-Rate Smoothing in a Two-Sector Small Open Economy.” Journal of Macroeconomics 29: 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2005.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Kam, T., K. Lees, and P. Liu. 2009. “Uncovering the Hit List for Small Inflation Targeters: A Bayesian Structural Analysis.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 41: 583–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00224.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, T. H., and P. Mizen. 2010. “Estimating Monetary Reaction Functions at Near Zero Interest Rates.” Economics Letters 106: 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.09.025.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuttner, K. N., and A. S. Posen. 2004. “The Difficulty of Discerning What’s Too Tight: Taylor Rules and Japanese Monetary Policy.” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 15: 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2003.12.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Lubik, T. A., and F. Schorfheide. 2007. “Do Central Banks Respond to Exchange Rate Movements? A Structural Investigation.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 1069–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.01.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Ng, S., and P. Perron. 2005. “A Note on the Selection of Time Series Models.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 67: 115–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00113.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Nikolsko-rzhevskyy, A. 2011. “Monetary Policy Estimation in Real Time : Forward-Looking Taylor Rules without Forward- Looking Data Stable.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 43: 871–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00400.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Onatski, A., and J. H. Stock. 2002. “Robust Monetary Policy under Model Uncertainty in a Small Model of the U.S. Economy.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 6: 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100502027050.Suche in Google Scholar

Orphanides, A. 2001. “Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data.” The American Economic Review 91: 964–85. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.964.Suche in Google Scholar

Peersman, G., and F. Smets. 1999. “The Taylor Rule: A Useful Monetary Policy Benchmark for the Euro Area?” International Finance 2: 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2362.00020.Suche in Google Scholar

Proïa, F. 2018. “Testing for Residual Correlation of Any Order in the Autoregressive Process.” Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 47: 628–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1310240.Suche in Google Scholar

Riboni, A., and F. J. Ruge-Murcia. 2010. “Monetary Policy by Committee: Consensus, Chairman Dominance, or Simple Majority?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125: 363–416. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.363.Suche in Google Scholar

Rudebusch, G. D. 2002. “Term Structure Evidence on Interest Rate Smoothing and Monetary Policy Inertia.” Journal of Monetary Economics 49: 1161–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(02)00149-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Rudebusch, G. D. 2006. “Monetary Policy Inertia: Fact or Fiction?” International Journal of Central Banking 2: 85–135.10.2139/ssrn.864484Suche in Google Scholar

Smales, L. A., and N. Apergis. 2016. “The Influence of FOMC Member Characteristics on the Monetary Policy Decision-Making Process.” Journal of Banking & Finance 64: 216–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Stock, J. H., and M. W. Watson. 2002. “Forecasting Using Principal Components from a Large Number of Predictors.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97: 1167–79. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618960.Suche in Google Scholar

Stocker, T. 2007. “On the Asymptotic Bias of OLS in Dynamic Regression Models with Autocorrelated Errors.” Statistical Papers 48: 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-006-0317-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. B. 1993. “Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series On Public Policy 39: 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, M. P., and E. Davradakis. 2006. “Interest Rate Setting and Inflation Targeting: Evidence of a Nonlinear Taylor Rule for the United Kingdom.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 10: 1359. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1359.Suche in Google Scholar

Tillmann, P. 2010. “Monetary Policy Committees and Model Uncertainty.” In Working Paper.Suche in Google Scholar

Tura-Gawron, K. 2017. “The Forecasts-Based Instrument Rule and Decision Making. How Closely Interlinked? The Case of Sweden.” Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 12: 295–315. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i2.16.Suche in Google Scholar

Vassalli, M., and C. Dalle Nogare. 2006. “A Pressure-Augmented Taylor Rule for Italy.” In Working Paper.Suche in Google Scholar

Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of A Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830169Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-07-20

Accepted: 2023-02-23

Published Online: 2023-03-28

Published in Print: 2023-05-25

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2022-0076

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

endogeneity; interest rate smoothing; model uncertainty; partial adjustment; policy inertia; serial correlation; Taylor-rule