Abstract
What effect did trade have on the size distribution of firms during the first wave of globalization? Three historical datasets from the German Empire between 1875 and 1907 were collected and harmonized to answer this question. This paper combines industry census and bilateral railway trade data from the same industry and region along with industry-level tariff data. The evidence shows that increases in aggregate trade caused the share of firms to shift from smaller to larger firms. Exogenous decreases in tariffs caused an increase in the share of the largest firms. The regional distributive effects of trade on inequality between firms that are discussed in the contemporaneous literature were already present during the first wave globalization.
Funding source: Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Funding statement: Financial support by the German National Academic Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Acknowledgment
I thank Mario Larch, two anonymous referees as well as Facundo Albornoz, Swati Dhingra, Basile Grassi, Hanwei Huang, Elsa Leromain, Stephan Maurer, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Frank Pisch, Steve Pischke, Thomas Sampson, Daniel Sturm, Jens Südekum, Jacques Thisse, Catherine Thomas, Hans-Joachim Voth and participants of the CEP International Economics Workshop, Frankfurt EGIT, 15th GEP Annual Postgraduate Conference Nottingham, 16th Trans-Atlantic Doctoral Conference LBS, the Urban Economics Association Summer School at the IEC in Barcelona, Annual congress Verein für Socialpolitik in Augsburg 2016, 18th ETSG in Helsinki, Econometric Society Winter Meeting in Edinburgh 2016 for helpful comments and discussions.
References
Adão, Rodrigo, Michal Kolesár, and Eduardo Morales. 2019. “Shift-Share Designs: Theory and Inference.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(4): 1949–2010. 10.3386/w24944Suche in Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Fred Bateman. 1999. “Nineteenth-Century U.S. Industrial Development Through the Eyes of the Census of Manufactures a New Resource for Historical Research.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 32(4): 177–188. 10.1080/01615449909598939Suche in Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, Michael R. Haines, and Robert A. Margo. 2011. “Railroads and the Rise of the Factory: Evidence for the United States, 1850–1870.” In Economic Evolution and Revolutions in Historical Time. Edited by P. Rhode, J. Rosenbloom, and D. Weiman. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. 10.11126/stanford/9780804771856.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar
Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2013. “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States.” American Economic Review 103(6): 2121–2168. 10.3386/w18054Suche in Google Scholar
Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2016. “The China Shock: Learning from Labor-Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade.” Annual Review of Economics 8(1): 205–240. 10.3386/w21906Suche in Google Scholar
Bartik, Timothy J. 1991. Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. 10.17848/9780585223940Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Thor. 2019. “Railroads and Rural Industrialization: Evidence from a Historical Policy Experiment.” Explorations in Economic History 74: 101277. 10.1016/j.eeh.2019.06.002Suche in Google Scholar
Berger, Thor, and Kerstin Enflo. 2017. “Locomotives of Local Growth: The Short- and Long-term Impact of Railroads in Sweden.” Journal of Urban Economics 98:124–138. Urbanization in Developing Countries: Past and Present. 10.1016/j.jue.2015.09.001Suche in Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, and Peter K. Schott. 2006. “Survival of the Best Fit: Exposure to Low-wage Countries and the (Uneven) Growth of U.S. Manufacturing Plants.” Journal of International Economics 68(1): 219–237. 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.002Suche in Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, and Peter K. Schott. 2009. “Importers, Exporters and Multinationals: A Portrait of Firms in the U.S. that Trade Goods.” In Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data. Edited by T. Dunne, J. B. Jensen, and M. J. Roberts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226172576.003.0015Suche in Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew B., J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott. 2007. “Firms in International Trade.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3): 105–130. 10.3386/w13054Suche in Google Scholar
Berthou, Antoine, Jong Hyun Chung, Kalina Manova, and Charlotte Sandoz Dit Bragard. 2019. Trade, Productivity and (Mis)allocation. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 14203. 10.2139/ssrn.3502471Suche in Google Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas, Mirko Draca, and John Van Reenen. 2016. “Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity.” Review of Economic Studies 83(1): 87–117. 10.3386/w16717Suche in Google Scholar
Bolt, Jutta, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2014. “The Maddison Project: Collaborative Research on Historical National Accounts.” Economic History Review 67(3): 627–651. 10.1111/1468-0289.12032Suche in Google Scholar
Bondi, Gerhard. 1958. Deutschlands Aussenhandel 1815–1870. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1515/9783112473740Suche in Google Scholar
Borusyak, Kirill, Peter Hull, and Xavier Jaravel. 2018. Quasi-Experimental Shift-Share Research Designs. NBER Working Paper No. 24997. 10.3386/w24997Suche in Google Scholar
Card, David. 2001. “Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics 19(1): 22–64. 10.3386/w5927Suche in Google Scholar
Combes, Pierre-Philippe, Gilles Duranton, Laurent Gobillon, Diego Puga, and Sébastien Roux. 2012. “The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration From Firm Selection.” Econometrica 80(6): 2543–2594. 10.2139/ssrn.2047288Suche in Google Scholar
Conley, Timothy G. 1999. “GMM Estimation with Cross Sectional Dependence.” Journal of Econometrics 92(1): 1–45. 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00084-0Suche in Google Scholar
Dauth, Wolfgang, Sebastian Findeisen, and Jens Suedekum. 2014. “The Rise of the East and the Far East: German Labor Markets AND Trade Integration.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12(6): 1643–1675. 10.1111/jeea.12092Suche in Google Scholar
De Loecker, Jan, and Frederic Warzynski. 2012. “Markups and Firm-Level Export Status.” American Economic Review 102(6): 2437–2471. 10.1257/aer.102.6.2437Suche in Google Scholar
di Giovanni, Julian, Andrei A. Levchenko, and Romain Rancière. 2011. “Power Laws in Firm Size and Openness to Trade: Measurement and Implications.” Journal of International Economics 85(1): 42–52. 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.05.003Suche in Google Scholar
Donaldson, Dave. 2018. “Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure.” American Economic Review 108(4–5): 899–934. 10.3386/w16487Suche in Google Scholar
Edmond, Chris, Virgiliu Midrigan, and Daniel Yi Xu. 2015. “Competition, Markups, and the Gains from International Trade.” American Economic Review 105(10): 3183–3221. 10.3386/w18041Suche in Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni. 1997. “Measuring Protection in the Early Twentieth Century.” European Review of Economic History 1(1): 89–125. 10.1017/S1361491697000051Suche in Google Scholar
Fajgelbaum, Pablo P., and Stephen J. Redding. 2014. Trade, Structural Transformation and Development: Evidence from Argentina 1869–1914. NBER Working Paper No. 20217. 10.3386/w20217Suche in Google Scholar
Fremdling, Rainer. 1995. “German National Accounts for the 19th and Early 20th Century.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 43(1): 77–100. 10.1080/03585522.1995.10415896Suche in Google Scholar
Gaubert, Cecile. 2018. “Firm Sorting and Agglomeration.” American Economic Review 108(11): 3117–3153. 10.3386/w24478Suche in Google Scholar
Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul, Isaac Sorkin, and Henry Swift. 2020. “Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How.” American Economic Review 110(8): 2586–2624. 10.3386/w24408Suche in Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1977. “International Trade, Domestic Coalitions, and Liberty: Comparative Responses to the Crisis of 1873–1896.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8(2): 281–313. 10.4324/9781315495811-21Suche in Google Scholar
Gutberlet, Theresa. 2012. Cheap Coal, Market Access, and Industry Location in Germany. Working Paper. Suche in Google Scholar
Gutberlet, Theresa. 2014. “Mechanization and the Spatial Distribution of Industries in the German Empire, 1875 to 1907.” Economic History Review 67(2): 463–491. 10.1111/1468-0289.12028Suche in Google Scholar
Hamerow, Theodore S., Lawrence G. Duggan, et al. 2020. “Germany from 1871 to 1918. The German Empire, 1871–1914.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Suche in Google Scholar
Hesse, Albert. 1914. “Gewerbestatistik.” In Grundriß zum Studium der Politischen Ökonomie Von Prof. Dr. J. Conrad, 2nd ed. Jena: Verlag Von Gustav Fischer. Suche in Google Scholar
Hohorst, Gerhard, Jürgen Kocka, and Gerhard A. Ritter. 1978. Sozialgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch II. Materialien zur Statistik des Kaiserreichs 1870–1914, 2nd ed. Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag. Suche in Google Scholar
Hornung, Erik. 2015. “Railroads and Growth in Prussia.” Journal of the European Economic Association 13(4): 699–736. 10.1111/jeea.12123Suche in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Peter J. Klenow. 2009. “Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1403–1448. 10.3386/w13290Suche in Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael, Christopher M. Meissner, and Kim Oosterlinck. 2017. “Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade.” Journal of Economic History 77(1): 39–89. 10.3386/w20851Suche in Google Scholar
Hummels, David, Rasmus Jørgensen, Jakob Munch, and Chong Xiang. 2014. “The Wage Effects of Offshoring: Evidence from Danish Matched Worker-Firm Data.” American Economic Review 104(6): 1597–1629. 10.3386/w17496Suche in Google Scholar
Jacks, David S., Christopher M. Meissner, and Dennis Novy. 2010. “Trade Costs in the First Wave of Globalization.” Explorations in Economic History 47(2): 127–141. 10.3386/w12602Suche in Google Scholar
Jedwab, Remi, and Alexander Moradi. 2016. “The Permanent Effects of Transportation Revolutions in Poor Countries: Evidence from Africa.” Review of Economics and Statistics 98(2): 268–284. 10.1162/REST_a_00540Suche in Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsch Reich. Dreißigster Jahrgang, 1909. Suche in Google Scholar
Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsch Reich. Fünfter Jahrgang. 1884. Suche in Google Scholar
Kopsidis, Michael, and Daniel Bromley. 2016. “The French Revolution and German Industrialization: Dubious Models and Doubtful Causality.” Journal of Institutional Economics 12(1): 161–190. 10.1017/S1744137415000223Suche in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Sibylle H. 2010. “The German Elections in the 1870s: Why Germany Turned from Liberalism to Protectionism.” Journal of Economic History 70(1): 146–178. 10.1017/S0022050710000082Suche in Google Scholar
Melitz, Marc J. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71(6): 1695–1725. 10.3386/w8881Suche in Google Scholar
Melitz, Marc J., and Stephen J. Redding. 2015. “New Trade Models, New Welfare Implications.” American Economic Review 105(3): 1105–1146. 10.3386/w18919Suche in Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin, and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1994. “Late Nineteenth-Century Anglo-American Factor-Price Convergence: Were Heckscher and Ohlin Right?” The Journal of Economic History 54(4): 892–916. 10.1017/S0022050700015539Suche in Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin H. 2000. “Tariffs and Growth in the Late 19th Century.” Economic Journal 110(463): 456–483. 10.1111/1468-0297.00533Suche in Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin H., Alan M. Taylor, and Jeffrey G. Williamson. 1996. “Factor Price Convergence in the Late Nineteenth Century.” International Economic Review 37(3): 499–530. 10.2307/2527439Suche in Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Kevin H. 2019. “Economic History and Contemporary Challenges to Globalization.” Journal of Economic History 79(2): 356–382. 10.3386/w25364Suche in Google Scholar
Pavcnik, Nina. 2002. “Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants.” Review of Economic Studies 69(1): 245–276. 10.3386/w7852Suche in Google Scholar
Restuccia, Diego, and Richard Rogerson. 2017. “The Causes and Costs of Misallocation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(3): 151–174. 10.3386/w23422Suche in Google Scholar
Ritschl, Albrecht. 2002. Deutschlands Krise und Konjunktur. Binnenkonjunktur, Auslandsverschuldung und Reparationsproblem Zwischen Dawes-Plan und Transfersperre 1924–34. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 10.1515/9783050079837Suche in Google Scholar
Smithson, Michael, and Jay Verkuilen. 2006. “A Better Lemon Squeezer? Maximum-likelihood Regression with Beta-distributed Dependent Variables.” Psychological Methods 11(1): 54. 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54Suche in Google Scholar
Sympher, Leo. 1913. “Das Anwachsen der Deutschen Binnenschifffahrt Von 1875 Bis 1910.” Zeitschrift für Binnenschifffahrt 1:3–12. Suche in Google Scholar
Torp, Cornelius. 2014. The Challenges of Globalization: Economy and Politics in Germany, 1860–1914. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books. Suche in Google Scholar
Trefler, Daniel. 2004. “The Long and Short of the Canada-U. S. Free Trade Agreement.” American Economic Review 94(4): 870–895. 10.3386/w8293Suche in Google Scholar
Wolf, Nikolaus. 2009. “Was Germany Ever United? Evidence from Intra- and International Trade, 1885–1933.” Journal of Economic History 69(3): 846–881. 10.1017/S0022050709001144Suche in Google Scholar
Wolf, Nikolaus, Max-Stephan Schulze, and Hans-Christian Heinemeyer. 2011. “On the Economic Consequences of the Peace: Trade and Borders After Versailles.” Journal of Economic History 71(4): 915–949. 10.1017/S0022050711002191Suche in Google Scholar
Supplemental Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2020-0048).
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- The benefits of remoteness – digital mobility data, regional road infrastructure, and COVID-19 infections
- Trade and the size distribution of firms: Evidence from the German Empire
- Quality of politicians and electoral system. Evidence from a quasi-experimental design for Italian cities
- Triplets, quads and quints: Estimating disaggregate trade elasticities with different odds ratios
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- The benefits of remoteness – digital mobility data, regional road infrastructure, and COVID-19 infections
- Trade and the size distribution of firms: Evidence from the German Empire
- Quality of politicians and electoral system. Evidence from a quasi-experimental design for Italian cities
- Triplets, quads and quints: Estimating disaggregate trade elasticities with different odds ratios