Some notes on the role of modal particles in weil+V2-clauses in German

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Antomo, Mailin & Markus Steinbach. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation. Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2010.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Catasso, Nicholas & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2016. On the question of subordination or coordination in V2Rs in German. In Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds.), Co- and subordination in German and other languages, Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 21. Hamburg: Buske.Suche in Google Scholar

Catasso, Nicholas. 2016. V2-Einbettung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Hypotaxe und Parataxe. Dissertation. LMU-München.Suche in Google Scholar

de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–101.Suche in Google Scholar

Gärtner, Hans Martin. 2001. Are there V2 relative clauses in German? Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3. 97–141.10.1023/A:1011432819119Suche in Google Scholar

Gärtner, Hans Martin. 2002. On the force of V2 declaratives. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.33.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2020. Assertive potential, speaker evidence and embedded V2. In Horst Lohnstein (ed.), Verb second and the left periphery. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501508141-005Suche in Google Scholar

Hinterhölzl, Roland. & Nicòla Munaro. 2015. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax, 41–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.226.03hinSuche in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond “ouch” and “oops:” How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency, Cornell University.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2013. Response particles as propositional anaphors. Proceedings of SALT 23. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2676.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 2020. Layers of assertive clauses: Propositions, judgements, commitments, acts. Open Access: lingbuzz/005348. 1–46.Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Suche in Google Scholar

Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Malte. 2012. Discourse particles. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics [HSK 33.2], 2011–2038. Berlin: de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar