Evidential strategies in English: not just lexical

References

Abbott, Barbara. 2010. Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aijmer, Karin. 2009. Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language 16(1). 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.05aij.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, John. 2007. The grammar of names. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297412.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bergqvist, Henrik. 2017. The role of “perspective” in evidential marking. Lingua 186–187. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.008.Search in Google Scholar

Bergqvist, Henrik & Karolina Grzech. 2023. The role of pragmatics in the definition of evidentiality. STUF 76(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.111515/stuf-2023–2004.10.1515/stuf-2023-2004Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Franz. 1910. Kwakiutl tales, V2. Reprint. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing LLC.10.1163/9789004615595Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16(1). 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy.Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper. 2018. Evidentiality: The notion and the term. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 261–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes). Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Cornillie, Bert. 2007. The continuum between lexical and grammatical evidentiality: A functional analysis of Spanish parecer. Rivista di Linguistica 19(1). 109–128.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, Rachel. 1972. Sequence of tenses in that clauses. In Paul Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds.), Papers from the eighth regional meeting: Chicago Linguistic Society, 41–51. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–102.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes), 203–213. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)80001-1.Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 1992. The information present: Present tense for communication in the past. In Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalailnen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, 262–286. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110877007.262Search in Google Scholar

Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. University of Stanford, PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Faller, Martina. 2012. Evidential scalar implicatures. Linguistics and Philosophy 35. 285–312.10.1007/s10988-012-9119-8Search in Google Scholar

Fara, Delia Graff. 2015a. Names are predicates. Philosophical Review 124(1). 59–117. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2812660.Search in Google Scholar

Fara, Delia Graff. 2015b. “Literal” uses of proper names. In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On reference, 251–279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714088.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Figueras Bates, Carolina & Dorota Kotwica. 2020. Introduction: Evidentiality, epistemicity and mitigation in Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00071-y.Search in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2018a. Evidentiality and its relations with other verbal categories. In Alexandra Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.3Search in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2018b. Evidentiality in Nakh-Dagestanian languages. In Alexandra Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.23Search in Google Scholar

Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noëlle. 1995. Le nom propre, suite. Travaux Linguïstiques 30. 93–102.Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1981. Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language 5(2). 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto. 2017. Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua 68. 186–187.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Hintz, Daniel J. & Diane M. Hintz. 2017. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. Lingua 186–187. 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.07.014.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Izvorski, Roumyana. 1997. The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In Aaron Lawson (ed.), SALT VII, 222–239. Ithaca: Cornell University.10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In R. Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings, vol. 2, 130–147. Cambridge University 1971. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.130Search in Google Scholar

Kleiber, Georges. 1992. Quand le nom propre prend l’article: Le cas des noms propres métonymiques. French Language Studies 2. 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269500001290.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1970. Tense and its relation to participants. Language 46(4). 838–849. https://doi.org/10.2307/412259.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on this and that. In Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting: Chicago Linguistic Society, 345–356. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lampert, Gunther & Martina Lampert. 2010. Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: Seem and be like. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63(4). 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2010.0024.Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3. 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91.Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00008-4.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Dorothy Demetracopoulou. 1938. Conceptual implications of an Indian language. Philosophy of Science 5(1). 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/286489.Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2008. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 21. 573–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9050-1.Search in Google Scholar

Mélac, Éric. 2014. L’évidentialité en anglais – approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais-tibétain. Linguistique. Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris III. 2014. Français. ffNNT: 2014PA030172ff. fftel-01230545f.Search in Google Scholar

Mélac, Éric. 2022. The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics 26(2). 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674321000101.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2020. Context and consciousness: Documenting evidentials. Folia Linguistica 54(2). 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2045.Search in Google Scholar

Mushin, Ilana. 2000. Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1361–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00078-3.Search in Google Scholar

Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Japanese reportive evidentiality and the pragmatics of retelling. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 927–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00085-5.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–254. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 1976. A new look at sequence of tenses. Pragmatics Microfiche 2(3/4).Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 1978. Sequence of tenses in English. University of Illinois, PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 1986. The meaning and discourse function of the past tense in English. Tesol Quarterly 20(2). 267–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586544.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 2010. Vantage theory and the use of English demonstrative determiners with proper nouns. Language Sciences 32(2). 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2009.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 2014. NP form and disempathic reference in English and French. In Empathy in Language, Literature, and Society Conference, Reykjavík.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 2015. Proper nouns with determiners. In 13th International Cognitive Linguistic Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 2017. Indefinite determiners with proper names. In 14th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Tartu.Search in Google Scholar

Riddle, Elizabeth. 2019. Information status and proper names with determiners. In 16th International Pragmatics Conference, Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Language 57(1). 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1981.0011.Search in Google Scholar

Schlichter, Alice. 1986. The origins and deictic nature of Wintu evidentials. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes), 46–59. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Schnedecker, Catherine. 2005. Quand «un certain David Bowie repoussait les limites du bon goût» ou que modifie certain dans les séquences un+certain+nom propre? Langue Française 146. 99–113. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.2005.6620.Search in Google Scholar

Sloat, Clarence. 1969. Proper nouns in English. Language 45(1). 26–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/411749.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2001. The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language 25(25). 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2008. Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics 46(5). 917–947. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2008.030.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, Susan. 2002. This, that and it in spoken American English: A demonstrative system of gradient focus. Language Sciences 24(2). 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(01)00012-2.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Jackson. 2018. Evidentials and person. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Jennifer Smith. 2021. Obviously undergoing change: Adverbs of evidentiality across time and space. Language Variation and Change 33(1). 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394520000216.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicholas & Randy J. Lapolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou.Search in Google Scholar

Visser, Eline. 2015. Tensed evidentials: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 279–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Winans, Lauren D. 2016. Inferences of will. University of California (Los Angeles), PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Woodbury, Anthony. 1986. Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes). Norwood (NJ): Ablex.Search in Google Scholar