Startseite Measuring One-Sided Process Capability Index for Autocorrelated Data in the Presence of Random Measurement Errors
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Measuring One-Sided Process Capability Index for Autocorrelated Data in the Presence of Random Measurement Errors

  • Kuntal Bera EMAIL logo und M. Z. Anis
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. Oktober 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Many quality characteristics in manufacturing industry are of one sided specifications. The well-known process capability indices C P U and C P L are often used to measure the performance of such type of production process. It is usually assumed that process observations are independent and measurement system is free of errors. But actually in many industry it has been proven that auto-correlation is an inherent nature of the production process, especially for chemical processes. Moreover, even with the use of highly sophisticated advanced measuring instruments some amount of measurement error is always present in the observed data. Hence gauge measurement error also needs to be considered. In this paper we discuss some inferential properties of one-sided process capability indices for a stationary Gaussian process in the presence of measurement errors. As a particular case of a stationary Gaussian process, we discuss the case of a stationary AR ( 1 ) process where measurement error follows an independent Gaussian distribution.

MSC 2020: 62P30

References

[1] M. Anis and K. Bera, Process capability cp assessment for auto-correlated data in the presence of measurement errors, Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 29 (2022), no. 6, Article ID 2250010. 10.1142/S0218539322500103Suche in Google Scholar

[2] K. Bera and M. Anis, Process incapability index for autocorrelated data in the presence of measurement errors, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods (2023), 10.1080/03610926.2023.2220921. 10.1080/03610926.2023.2220921Suche in Google Scholar

[3] A. F. B. Costa and P. Castagliola, Effect of measurement error and auto-correlation on the X ¯ chart, J. Appl. Stat. 38 (2011), no. 4, 661–673. 10.1080/02664760903563627Suche in Google Scholar

[4] B. S. Gildeh and Z. A. Ganji, The effect of measurement error on the process incapability index, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 49 (2020), no. 3, 552–566. 10.1080/03610926.2018.1543777Suche in Google Scholar

[5] R. D. Guevara and J. A. Vargas, Comparison of process capability indices under autocorrelated data, Rev. Colombiana Estadíst. 30 (2007), no. 2, 301–316. Suche in Google Scholar

[6] M. R. Maleki, A. Amiri and P. Castagliola, Measurement errors in statistical process monitoring: A literature review, Comput. Indus. Eng. 103 (2017), 316–329. 10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.026Suche in Google Scholar

[7] H.-J. Mittag, Measurement error effects on the performance of process capability indices, Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, Springer, Heidelberg (1997), 195–206. 10.1007/978-3-642-59239-3_15Suche in Google Scholar

[8] D. C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2020. Suche in Google Scholar

[9] A. M. Mood, Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950. Suche in Google Scholar

[10] E. Nikzad, A. Amiri and F. Amirkhani, Estimating total and specific process capability indices in three-stage processes with measurement errors, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 88 (2018), no. 15, 3033–3064. 10.1080/00949655.2018.1498096Suche in Google Scholar

[11] W. L. Pearn and M.-Y. Liao, One-sided process capability assessment in the presence of measurement errors, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 22 (2006), no. 7, 771–785. 10.1002/qre.727Suche in Google Scholar

[12] S. C. Shongwe and J. Malela-Majika, A new variable sampling size and interval synthetic and runs-rules schemes to monitor the process mean of autocorrelated observations with measurement errors, Int. J. Indust. Eng. Comput. 11 (2020), no. 4, 607–626. 10.5267/j.ijiec.2020.4.003Suche in Google Scholar

[13] S. C. Shongwe and J.-C. Malela-Majika, Combined effect of auto-correlation and measurement errors on the adaptive x¯ monitoring schemes, Trans. Inst. Measurement Control 43 (2021), no. 3, 537–548. 10.1177/0142331220935293Suche in Google Scholar

[14] S. C. Shongwe, J.-C. Malela-Majika and P. Castagliola, On monitoring the process mean of autocorrelated observations with measurement errors using the w-of-w runs-rules scheme, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 36 (2020), no. 3, 1144–1160. 10.1002/qre.2622Suche in Google Scholar

[15] S. C. Shongwe, J.-C. Malela-Majika and P. Castagliola, The new synthetic and runs-rules schemes to monitor the process mean of autocorrelated observations with measurement errors, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 50 (2021), no. 24, 5806–5835. 10.1080/03610926.2020.1737125Suche in Google Scholar

[16] S. C. Shongwe, J.-C. Malela-Majika, P. Castagliola and T. Molahloe, Side-sensitive synthetic and runs-rules charts for monitoring AR(1) processes with skipping sampling strategies, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 49 (2020), no. 17, 4248–4269. 10.1080/03610926.2019.1596284Suche in Google Scholar

[17] S. C. Shongwe, J.-C. Malela-Majika and T. Molahloe, One-sided runs-rules schemes to monitor autocorrelated time series data using a first-order autoregressive model with skip sampling strategies, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 35 (2019), no. 6, 1973–1997. 10.1002/qre.2487Suche in Google Scholar

[18] H. Shore, Process capability analysis when data are autocorrelated, Qual. Eng. 9 (1997), no. 4, 615–626. 10.1080/08982119708919083Suche in Google Scholar

[19] A. Srivastava, A. Chaturvedi and N. Kumar, Finite sample performance of an estimator of process capability index cpm for the autocorrelated data, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. (2021), 10.1080/03610918.2021.1962344. 10.1080/03610918.2021.1962344Suche in Google Scholar

[20] J. Sun, S. Wang and Z. Fu, The effect of autocorrelated data on taguchi process capability index cpm based on ar (1) model, 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science, IEEE Press, Piscataway (2009), 1–4. 10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5301174Suche in Google Scholar

[21] F.-K. Wang and Y. Tamirat, Lower confidence bound for process-yield index s pk with autocorrelated process data, Qual. Technol. & Quant. Manag. 12 (2015), no. 2, 253–267. 10.1080/16843703.2015.11673380Suche in Google Scholar

[22] N. F. Zhang, Estimating process capability indexes for autocorrelated data, J. Appl. Stat. 25 (1998), no. 4, 559–574. 10.1080/02664769823025Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-20
Revised: 2023-08-31
Accepted: 2023-08-31
Published Online: 2023-10-04
Published in Print: 2023-12-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eqc-2023-0020/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen