COCO, a process simulator: methane oxidation simulation & its agreement with commercial simulator’s predictions
-
Toyese Oyegoke
Abstract
It is impossible to overstate the value of process simulators in teaching process engineers about petrochemical, chemical, nuclear, and biological processes. Several chemical engineering topics, including process design, thermodynamics, process integration, separation processes, safety, and others, are made easier to teach because of this. Only a handful of these process simulators are freeware, while most are largely commercial. The ones that are commercialized are renowned for their friendliness, extensive media coverage, and international credibility attained for their forecasts in several industrial applications. However, schools in low-income countries may not be able to buy them. In contrast, the freeware publicity is not relatively low, less friendly, and cheaper than the commercial ones. This research compares the agreement of the forecast of commercial process simulators with freeware ones in an effort to strengthen institutions’ trust in the prediction of freeware process simulators. The analysis modeled and simulated a chemical process involving the Gibbs reactor, heater, compressor, and mixer in the COCO and Aspen HYSYS simulators. Findings from the research reveal good agreement in the predicted results obtained from the various process simulators. With the use of COCO, different possible methane oxidation routes were analyzed. The analysis confirmed that the route leading to the formation of CO2 and water would be less energetic than other routes. In addition, the formation of water would be much easier in the process than hydrogen at the condition employed in the study. Due to cost, the study recommends using the freeware process simulator instead of the cracked version, which is often utilized in educating process engineers and research projects in communities where research and education are poorly funded.
Acknowledgments
The author does appreciate the developers and contributors of COCO process simulators for making it available free of charge to all, and the support of the Pencil Team is well acknowledged.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Wikipedia. Process simulation – Wikipedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 2023. [Online]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_simulation [Accessed 25 Feb 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
2. Processium. Chemical process simulation: processium, process simulation (chemical process simulation and conception); 2023. https://web.archive.org/web/20150710045707/http://en.processium.com/process-simulation/chemical-process-simulation.htm# [Accessed 25 Feb 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
3. Wikipedia. Chemical process modeling. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 2023. [Online]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_process_modeling [Accessed 25 Feb 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
4. Yanisa, S, Thongchai, RS, Peerapan, D, Kotchakorn, C. Heat integrated process design, simulation and control of polymerization and drying sections for HDPE production. Appl Sci Eng Prog 2016;9:121–136. https://doi.org/10.14416/10.14416/j.ijast.2016.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Tohəneanu, MC, Pleşu, V, Iancu, P, Bumbac, G, Bonet Ruiz, AE, Ruiz, JB. Simulation and process integration of clean acetone plant. Chem Eng Trans 2014;39:469–74. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1439079.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Kenneth, DK, Gonurubon, J, Michael, AO, Douglas, NH. Simulation of a process unit for the recovery of light ends from natural gas mixture. Bioprocess Eng 2022;6:33. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.BE.20220602.14.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Walker, K. Techno-economic feasibility of propane dehydrogenation in novel membrane reactors. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology; 2020. [Online]. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/203528420/Master_Thesis_Keegan_Walker.pdf [Accessed 10 Dec 2022].Suche in Google Scholar
8. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, F. Techno-economic feasibility study of bioethanol production from a combined cellulose and sugar feedstock in Nigeria: 2-economic analysis. Nigerian J Technol 2018;37:913–20. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i4.9.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Oyegoke, T, Dabai, F. Techno-economic feasibility study of bioethanol production from a combined cellulose and sugar feedstock in Nigeria: 1-modeling, simulation and cost evaluation. Nigerian J Technol 2018;37:913–20. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v37i4.8.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Oyegoke, T, Sardauna, MY, Abubakar, HA, Obadiah, E. Exploration of biomass for the production of bioethanol: ‘a process modelling and simulation study’. Renew Energy Res Appl 2021;2:51–69. https://doi.org/10.22044/RERA.2020.10287.1042.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Ajayi, OO, Rasheed, K, Onadeji, A, Oyegoke, T. Techno-economic assessment of transforming sorghum bagasse into bioethanol fuel in Nigeria: 1-process modeling, simulation, and cost estimation. J Eng Stud Res 2020;26:154–64. https://doi.org/10.29081/jesr.v26i3.219.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Abemi, A, Oyegoke, T, Dabai, FN, Jibril, BY. Technical and economic feasibility of transforming molasses into bioethanol in Nigeria. In: National engineering conference; 2018:531–7 pp.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Navarro Perez, DJ, Moreno Diaz, JC, Simeone Barrientos, PA. Emergency remote teaching in process simulation using DWSIM: a case study from DIQ-UMAG, Chilean Patagonia. Sci Tech 2022;27:130–40. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.25065 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8518384&info=resumen&idioma=ENG.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Wikipedia. List of chemical process simulators – Wikipedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 2023. [Online]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chemical_process_simulators [Accessed 25 Feb 2022].Suche in Google Scholar
15. UniSim. UniSim design | process simulation software. Honey Well Forge Report; 2023. https://www.honeywellforge.ai/us/en/products/industrials/unisim-design [Accessed 28 Jan 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
16. COCO. COCO – the CAPE-OPEN to CAPE-OPEN simulator. CAPE-OPEN Report; 2021. https://www.cocosimulator.org/ [Accessed 30 Oct 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
17. van Baten, J, Rozas, L. An introduction to COCO. COCO Simulator Report; 2007. [Online]. http://www.chemsep.com/ [Accessed 28 Jan 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
18. Jasper van, B, Ross, T, Harry, K. Using Chemsep, COCO and other modeling tools for versatility in custom process modeling. Almeria: Amsterchem Report; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Aspentech. Aspen HYSYS dynamics | intuitive dynamic modeling | AspenTech. Aspentech Report; 2021. https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-hysys-dynamics [Accessed 30 Oct 2021].Suche in Google Scholar
20. SuperPro Designer. Process simulations. Intelligen, Inc. Report; 2020. https://www.intelligen.com/products/superpro-overview/ [Accessed 28 Jan 2023].Suche in Google Scholar
21. Canizales, L, Rojas, F, Pizarro, CA, Caicedo-Ortega, NH, Villegas-Torres, MF. SuperPro Designer®, user-oriented software used for analyzing the techno-economic feasibility of electrical energy generation from sugarcane vinasse in Colombia. Processes 2020;8:1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8091180.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Selim Arif Sher Shah, M, Oh, C, Park, H, Hwang, YJ, Ma, M, Park, JH. Catalytic oxidation of methane to oxygenated products: recent advancements and prospects for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic conversion at low temperatures. Adv Sci 2020;7:2001946. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADVS.202001946.Suche in Google Scholar
23. Nawkarkar, P, Ganesan, A, Kumar, S. Carbon dioxide capture for biofuel production. In: Handbook of biofuels; 2022:605–19 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-822810-4.00032-4Suche in Google Scholar
24. Jian, X, Wei, W, Bao, X. Thermodynamic study on the catalytic partial oxidation of methane to syngas. Chin J Chem Eng 2002;10:56–62.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Nasri, Z, Binous, H. Applications of the soave–redlich–kwong equation of state using mathematica®. J Chem Eng Jpn 2007;40:534–8. https://doi.org/10.1252/JCEJ.40.534.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Upreti, SR. Process modeling and simulation for chemical engineers: theory and practice. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017.10.1002/9781118914670Suche in Google Scholar
27. Turton, R, Bailie, RC, Whiting, WB, Shaeiwitz, JA, Bhattacharyya, D. Analysis, synthesis, and design of chemical processes fourth edition, 4th ed. New York: Prentice Hall; 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Okiemute, AS, Makarfi, IY. Review of carbon capture and methane production from carbon dioxide. Atmosphere 2022;13:1958. https://doi.org/10.3390/ATMOS13121958.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Petinrin, MO, Adebayo, MB, Adelowokan, AT. A review on hydrogen as a fuel for automotive application. Int J Energy Eng 2014;4:75–80. https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJEE.20140404.02.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Pan, A, Liu, J, Liu, Z, Yang, Y, Yang, X, Zhang, M. Application of hydrogen energy and review of current conditions. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2020;526:012124. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/526/1/012124.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Geburtig, D, Preuster, P, Bösmann, A, Müller, K, Wasserscheid, P. Chemical utilization of hydrogen from fluctuating energy sources – catalytic transfer hydrogenation from charged Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016;41:1010–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Anggoro, DD, Chamdani, FT, Buchori, L. One step catalytic oxidation process of methane to methanol at low reaction temperature: a brief review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021;1053:012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1053/1/012056.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Tuning of PID controllers for unstable first-order plus dead time systems
- Oxygen excess ratio control of PEM fuel cell: fractional order modeling and fractional filter IMC-PID control
- Proposal and energy/exergy/economic analyses of a smart heat recovery for distillation tower of the Naphtha Hydrotreating Unit of the Petrochemical Plant; designing a low-carbon plant
- Three-dimensional CFD study on thermo-hydraulic behaviour of finned tubes in a heat exchange system for heat transfer enhancement
- A simulation and thermodynamic improvement of the methanol production process with economic analysis: natural gas vapor reforming and utilization of carbon capture
- Optimization of hydrogel composition for effective release of drug
- Mathematical modelling of water-based biogas scrubber operating at digester pressure
- COCO, a process simulator: methane oxidation simulation & its agreement with commercial simulator’s predictions
- Hydrodynamics of shear thinning fluid in a square microchannel: a numerical approach
- Parameter estimation in non-linear chemical processes: an opposite point-based differential evolution (OPDE) approach
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Tuning of PID controllers for unstable first-order plus dead time systems
- Oxygen excess ratio control of PEM fuel cell: fractional order modeling and fractional filter IMC-PID control
- Proposal and energy/exergy/economic analyses of a smart heat recovery for distillation tower of the Naphtha Hydrotreating Unit of the Petrochemical Plant; designing a low-carbon plant
- Three-dimensional CFD study on thermo-hydraulic behaviour of finned tubes in a heat exchange system for heat transfer enhancement
- A simulation and thermodynamic improvement of the methanol production process with economic analysis: natural gas vapor reforming and utilization of carbon capture
- Optimization of hydrogel composition for effective release of drug
- Mathematical modelling of water-based biogas scrubber operating at digester pressure
- COCO, a process simulator: methane oxidation simulation & its agreement with commercial simulator’s predictions
- Hydrodynamics of shear thinning fluid in a square microchannel: a numerical approach
- Parameter estimation in non-linear chemical processes: an opposite point-based differential evolution (OPDE) approach
