Why Children, Parrots, and Actors Cannot Speak: The Stoics on Genuine and Superficial Speech

References

Editions of Primary Sources

Busse, A. 1897. Ammonius in Aristotelis de Interpretatione Commentarium (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca), Prussian Academy Series. Berlin: Reimer.10.1515/9783112361023Suche in Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. 2013. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, New York: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511843440Suche in Google Scholar

Goetz, G., and F. Schoell. 1910. M. Terenti Varronis De Lingia Latina Quae Supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Hülser, K. 1987. Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker: Neue Sammlung der Texte mit der deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentaren. 4 Bände. Stuttgart: Frommann-holzboog.Suche in Google Scholar

Marrone, L. 1997. “Le Questioni Logichi di Crisippo (PHerc 307).” Cronache Ercolanesi 27: 83–100.Suche in Google Scholar

Mau, J., and H. Mutschmann. 1914–1961. Sexti Empirici Opera, 2nd ed., Vol. 2 & 3, 1–177. Leipzig: Teubner. 2, 1914; 3, 1961: 2: p. 3–429; 3.Suche in Google Scholar

Rabe, H. 1931. Prolegomenon Sylloge, Rhetores Graeci, Vol. xiv: Prolegomenon Sylloge. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Tuebneriana).Suche in Google Scholar

Remnant, P., and J. Bennett. 1996. Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166874Suche in Google Scholar

Schenkle, H. 1916. Epictetus: Dissertationes Ab Arriano Digestae; Enchiridion. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Usener, H., and I. Radermacher. 1899–1929. Dionysii Halicarnasei Quae Exstant, De Compositione Verborum in Vol. 5. Leipzig: Teubner.Suche in Google Scholar

Von Arnim, Hans. (1905). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, Vol. 3. In Aedibus B. G. Teubneri.Suche in Google Scholar

Walz, C. 1832–1836. Rhetores Graeci. Tubingen: Sumtibus J. C. Cottae.Suche in Google Scholar

Winkler, K. P. 1996. Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett.Suche in Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

Atherton, C. 1993. The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ax, W. 1986. Laut, Stimme und Sprache: Studien zu drei Grundbegriffen der antiken Sprachtheorie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.10.13109/9783666251818Suche in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1993. “Meaning, Saying, and Thinking.” In Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer l’orläufer, Philosophie der Antike, 1, edited by K. Döring and T. Ebert. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Suche in Google Scholar

Blank, D. L. 2014. Ammonius: On Aristotle on Interpretation 1–8. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Suche in Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. 2002. “Chrysippus and the epistemic theory of vagueness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1): 217–38.10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00051.xSuche in Google Scholar

Brittain, C. 2002. “Non-Rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 253–308.10.1093/oso/9780199255894.003.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Bronowski, A. 2019a. The Stoics on Lekta: All There Is to Say. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198842880.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bronowski, A. 2019b. “What Is Wrong with Lekta? Ancient Critics of Stoic Logic and Language.” Methodos 19.10.4000/methodos.5276Suche in Google Scholar

Caluori, D. 2018. “Aporia and the Limits of Reason and Language in Damascius.” In The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, edited by K. George and V. Politis, 269–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316274293.015Suche in Google Scholar

de Harven, V. 2019. “Rational Impressions and the Stoic Philosophy of Mind.” In History of Philosophy of Mind: Pre-socratics to Augustine, edited by J. Sisko, 214–35. New York: Acumen Publishing.10.4324/9780429508219-12Suche in Google Scholar

Fögen, T. 2014. “Animal Communication.” In The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life, edited by G. L. Campbell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589425.013.013Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987. “Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1994. “The Stoic Notion of a Lekton.” In Language, edited by S. Everson, 109–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Glidden, D. K. 1994. “Parrots, Pyrrhonists, and Native Speakers.” In Language, edited by S. Everson, 129–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1982. “The Stoic Theory of Meaning.” In The Stoics, edited by Rist.10.1525/9780520339255-005Suche in Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. 1977. The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hülser, K. 2012. “Pragmatics and the Idea of the Illocutionary in Stoic Language Theory.” In Politics of Practical Reasoning: Integrating Action, Discourse, and Argument, edited by R. Edmondson and K. Hülser, 31–45. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. 1990. “Presentation and Assent: A Physical and Cognitive Problem in Early Stoicism.” The Classical Quarterly 40: 433–49.10.1017/S0009838800043007Suche in Google Scholar

Kneale, W., and M. Kneale. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lesses, G. 1998. “Content, Cause, and Stoic Impressions.” Phronesis 43: 1–25.10.1163/15685289860517775Suche in Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 1971. “Language and Thought in Stoicism.” In Problems in Stoicism, edited by A. A. Long, 75–113. New Jersey: Athlone Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Long, A. A., and D. Sedley. 1987 The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Suche in Google Scholar

Mates, B. 1961. Stoic Logic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mühl, M. 1962. “Der λόγος ἐνδιάθετος und προφορικός von der Älteren Stoa bis zur Synode von Sirmium 351.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 7: 7–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Nuchelmans, G. 1973. Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Panaccio, C. 1999. Le discours intérieur: De Platon à Guillaume d’Ockham. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. 1939. “Die Begründung der abendländischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa.” Kleine Schriften I: 79–86. Hildesheim.Suche in Google Scholar

Schenkeveld, D. M. 1984. “Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods.” Mnemosyne 37: 291–52.10.1163/156852584X00574Suche in Google Scholar

Shogry, S. 2019. “What Do Our Impressions Say? The Stoic Theory of Perceptual Content and Belief Formation.” Apeiron 52 (1): 29–63.10.1515/apeiron-2018-0001Suche in Google Scholar

Smyth, H. W. 1920. Greek Grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 1990. “Perceptual Content in the Stoics.” Phronesis 35: 307–14.10.1163/156852890X00213Suche in Google Scholar

Vogt, K. M. 2012. “Appearances and Assent: Sceptical Belief Reconsidered.” Classical Quarterly 62: 648–63.10.1017/S0009838812000225Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar