Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
-
Maria Bittner
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
15. September 2006
Abstract
1. Introduction
Hamm, Kamp, and van Lambalgen 2006 (hereafter HKL) propose to relate NL discourse to cognitive representations that also deal with world knowledge, planning, belief revision, etc. Their implementation involves translating NL discourse first into DRT, which explicates the linguistic information, and then into an event calculus, which uses world knowledge and non-monotonic reasoning to arrive at the final cognitive representation.
Published Online: 2006-09-15
Published in Print: 2006-09-01
© Walter de Gruyter
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Comments on: Fritz Hamm, Hans Kamp, Michiel van Lambalgen, There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
- Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen
- What is an action-based model of interpretation?
- Is semantics computational?
- The future of semantics?
- Replies to comments
Artikel in diesem Heft
- There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Comments on: Fritz Hamm, Hans Kamp, Michiel van Lambalgen, There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
- Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen
- What is an action-based model of interpretation?
- Is semantics computational?
- The future of semantics?
- Replies to comments
