Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
-
Maria Bittner
Published/Copyright:
September 15, 2006
Abstract
1. Introduction
Hamm, Kamp, and van Lambalgen 2006 (hereafter HKL) propose to relate NL discourse to cognitive representations that also deal with world knowledge, planning, belief revision, etc. Their implementation involves translating NL discourse first into DRT, which explicates the linguistic information, and then into an event calculus, which uses world knowledge and non-monotonic reasoning to arrive at the final cognitive representation.
Published Online: 2006-09-15
Published in Print: 2006-09-01
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Comments on: Fritz Hamm, Hans Kamp, Michiel van Lambalgen, There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
- Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen
- What is an action-based model of interpretation?
- Is semantics computational?
- The future of semantics?
- Replies to comments
Articles in the same Issue
- There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Comments on: Fritz Hamm, Hans Kamp, Michiel van Lambalgen, There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics
- Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics)
- Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen
- What is an action-based model of interpretation?
- Is semantics computational?
- The future of semantics?
- Replies to comments
