Startseite Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. November 2007
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Informationen für Autor*innen
Microform & Digitization Review
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 33 Heft 4

Published Online: 2007-11-28
Published in Print: 2004-December

© 2004 by K. G. Saur

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Impressum
  2. From the Editor-in-Chief
  3. Comment and News
  4. Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  5. “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  6. A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
  7. Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
  8. Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
  9. Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
  10. Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
  11. It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
  12. Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
  13. Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  14. Evans Digital Edition
  15. TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
  16. Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Impressum
  2. From the Editor-in-Chief
  3. Comment and News
  4. Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  5. “Wouldn't Be Prudent”: Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  6. A Critique of “Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method”
  7. Addressing a Risk Perspective when Considering Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method: A Response from “Down Under”
  8. Digitization as a Preservation Method – A Comment from Singapore
  9. Digitization as a Preservation Method – Comments from the Netherlands
  10. Digital Preservation in the Context of Changing Reading Behaviors and Research Methods
  11. It's Time to Recognize the Technologies That Are in Place
  12. Digitization for Preservation: Far Too Many Benefits over Microfilming
  13. Why the Preservation Community Should Support ARL's Call for Acceptance of Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
  14. Evans Digital Edition
  15. TL-2 (Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edition) Online
  16. Index 2004 Microform & Imaging Review
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/MFIR.2004.210/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen